preview

For The Progress A Return To Deaf Centered Education Summary

Decent Essays

Lane’s perspective was to argue about the deaf segregation education in a hearing school and bilingual language minorities. In the part six of the book called For the Progress, a Return to Deaf-Centered Education discussed about the early century, deaf American children studied all their subjects in their most fluent language, ASL that way they can continue their education (Lane, pg. 165). Basically, the author argued that deaf children shouldn’t be isolated in a hearing school, and should be taught how some bilingual children are taught; through both languages for better understanding. The beginning talks about a deaf president at Gallaudet University who was one of the author witnesses. He also observed the protest where the government showed negligence; which means that the government didn’t seem to …show more content…

Later in life they would become independent, and it’s best to experience these two different cultures to help develop their preferences. They are able to express their preferred languages and their own preferences once they grow older. They are able to individually label themselves who they are. In my opinion, this book is very persuasive to most readers. It helps to learn about deaf childhoods, and that learning to sign and speak was the best choice whether their parents were deaf or hearing. Some hearing parents don’t know what to do with a deaf child, and attempt to find a way to be able to cure a deaf child. Even some deaf parents can sign but can't speak or chose not to, but some are forced to speak adapting to hearing community. However, they are lucky to have the deaf community for them as well, while hearing parents would only know of their hearing community and not the deaf. In education, they tried to arrange so that deaf children can learn both sign language and spoken English, and be taught through

Get Access