"For the Sake of Our Planet, Tourism Should Be Discouraged." How Far Do You Agree or Disagree?

Over the years, tourism has grown to be one of the most rampant industries in our economy. Visiting new places, trying new food, observing new cultures, and visiting sites of attraction all are great ways for recreation, and creates booming business for many tourism industries. However, tourists forget the consequences of their recreation. In the long run, tourism can lead to the loss of biodiversity that destabilizes ecosystems, and threatens our food supplies. Tourism also leads to an increase in ozone – depleting pollutants such as chlorofluorocarbons. Refrigerants, aerosol sprays, and pollutants from aircrafts all contribute to the destruction of our ozone layer in the long run. Furthermore, tourism not only impacts weather; we can also

Nowadays, the growing public awareness of the impact of aircraft emissions on the environment forces the aviation stakeholders to search for environmentally friendly solutions. The relation between aircraft emissions and climate change relies heavily on fossil fuels. Indeed, when an aircraft burns fuel, several pollutants that alter the chemical composition of the atmosphere are produced and released into the sky. One of the principal pollutants emitted from aviation is the carbon dioxide (CO2); a greenhouse gas well known for its contribution to global warming. For each kilogram of fuel consumed, a typical engine of a commercial aircraft produces on average 3.15 kilograms of CO2 [X]. In comparison to other modes of transport, the aviation industry is responsible for 2.5% of global carbon dioxide emissions [X]. Although this percentage may seem relatively small, it has in reality a disproportionate large impact on the environment. Indeed, around 80% of aviation emissions are emitted from flights of over 5,000 feet, and as pointed out by Lee et al. in [X], the impact per kilogram of CO2 emissions at high-altitudes on climate change is about twice that of emissions at ground-level. Faced with this awareness, the International Air Transportation Association (IATA) has recognized the need to address the global challenge of climate change and has set the ambitious goal of reducing the aviation carbon footprint by 50% by 2050, relative to 2005 levels [X].

One means to increasing environmental stability is represented by the reduction of the carbon print. In other words, emphasis is placed on the reduction of the carbon consumed with the scope of decreasing the negative environmental impact onto the environment. Within Australia, this endeavor has been approached at multiple levels, one notable effort being represented by the creation and implementation of a carbon tax. At this level then, the focus falls on the assessment of the tax and its short and long term impacts on the tourism and hospitality industry.

Elon Musk, founder of Tesla and Spacex, once stated “Some people don’t like to change, but you need to embrace the change if the alternative is disaster.” Elon Musk will shape our future travels to be more efficient and safe, with a goal to reduce the world’s amount of fuel consumption. This is an important topic to investigate because of the amount of greenhouse gases that have been emitted into the atmosphere from our ways of travel. The planes, trains, cars, and other forms of transportation contribute to an outrageous percentage of the pollution and are negatively impacting our Earth in ways, such as global warming. Elon Musk has made it his own personal goal to change the ways humans unintentionally treat our planet. Musk’s ideas to reduce

However, the Travel and Tourism industry has not only some benefits and also drawbacks. Tourism can cause its share of problems such as social dislocation, loss of cultural heritage, ecological degradation, pollution and noise. For instance, much of the corals on Pulau Payar Marine Park, Langkawi, Malaysia were damaged due to mass arrival of tourists as the travel operators has allowed 600 to 700 tourists on the island at a time [4]. One hand, there is a push to bring in tourists dollars but on the other little is done to protect the precious biodiversity which is its main attraction. These problems have been recognized by many involved in tourism and have become

In 2012, transportation accounted for 19% of the total global energy consumption, 96% of which was produced by fossil fuels [1, p. 201]. Furthermore, air transport is the most carbon intensive mode of transportation, accounting for approximately 10 times more carbon emissions than road transport and 100 times more than shipping (per tonne km) [2, p. 4].

If the public transportation improves, more and more people would take buses instead of driving. Then there would be less CO2 for our environment. Mohammad-Beigi, Nouri and Liaghati (2015) claim that the population in large cities is growing very fast, which means that transportation needs also increase really fast which leads to environmental problems. Therefore, in order to solve the problem, improving public transportation is a good solution. This study shows that driving cars really causes air pollution and it is harm for our environment. Phoenix is the largest city in Arizona, so the population growth in Phoenix will lead to the same problem that the three author mentioned. Improving public transportation will be helpful in decreasing the number of drivers and therefore reducing toxic emission. According to the PR Newswire Europe Improving public transportation in Brasilia (2009) claim public transportation is good because buses are more orderly, and they are safer and have less impact on the environment. It also shows that public transportation can help to reduce air pollution. Phoenix is an urban city like Brasilia, so it has a similar situation. Improving public transportation would be a good solution because it will lead to less driving. Then we will reduce exhaust gas

Pollution is slowly ruining the earth, so if we can cut down on fuel (which is caused by how much weight is on a plane) we could slowly eliminate all pollution in the world.

From the Post Classical Period (600 C.E. - 1450 C.E.) to modern times exploration has changed and yet stayed the same in many ways. Explorers changed their MODE OF TRANSPORTATION from using boats or canoes to using space shuttles and rovers. The destinations changed from uncharted territory on earth to exploring outer space. This change was caused by the advancement of technology over time, as well as, over population. Technology now allows explorers to travel hundreds of thousands of miles in contrast to before when they weren’t able to travel more than a hundred miles because of the fear of bad weather and bad sailing conditions threatening their boat. During the two time periods one of the continuities is the reason for exploration. The

Passenger air travel has been forecasted to increase to over 1 billion persons annually by 2023. This

Firstly, public transportation reduces carbon dioxide emissions. For instance, if everyone used their own private car to get to their destination daily, there will be a plenty of poisonous toxic gas released into the atmosphere daily which contributes to global warming and air pollution. "Public transportation produces about half as much carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide, per passenger mile, as private vehicles"(1). Thus, an advantage for our environment as well as for our health. "A research by United Nation revealed that people who are more likely to use public transports have contributed in reducing emission as much as

From an environmental perspective, it is apparent that the world is starting to realise that increases in tourism are having a negative impact on the environment. This is due to increases in energy consumption, which in turn heightens the effects of global warming (Neto, 2002). There are many controls that governments are trying to put into place, such as flight rationing (Liverpool Business School, 2009). However, it can be argued that these have not really begun to have a significant effect on tourism, as they are still insufficient to dampen demand. It may become a problem in future years, as the number of controls is likely to increase. Perhaps the largest environmental factor would be natural disasters, like Hurricane Katrina (Cashell, 2005) and the tsunami that hit Asia in December 2004 (Birkland, 2006). These will impact negatively on people’s confidence in visiting places that have been hit severely by such disasters.

A significant increment in the quantity of individuals utilizing a range's assets is liable to have an impeding effect on the environmental. These damage are are area disintegration, expanded activity or swarmed parks; however the effect may be sufficiently extreme to bring about damage to a delicate normal zone. Next, Air pollution has caused a huge issue with the expanded level of vehicle movement in a destination zone; alongside different exercises or sources that cause air-quality issues. Another damages will be noise pollution is turning into a issue in numerous groups particularly with the movement or extension of airports. The last damage of environmental is devastation of flora and fauna and legacy destinations is the impacts that occur to vegetation, wildlife, and precious historical attractions. Unplanned or poorly planned development can lead to the endangerment of flora and fauna species and the erosions of the sites. However, the advantages of environmental is minimizing the environmental impacts of tourism through good design and planning. First, in order to provide services to visitors, a tourism area must first develop the necessary infrastructure to support these services. Infrastructure is the underlying foundation or basic framework for a system or

Automobiles are a major producer of greenhouse gas. One gallon of fuel burned puts five pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Let’s say that an average car gets 25 miles to the gallon, and that car has a ten gallon tank. Every time a car gets filled up with gas, another fifty pounds of carbon dioxide have been put back into the atmosphere, and that is just one car. The automobile industry is very important to the world economy, so I am not saying that we should stop making cars, but there are other solutions. The recent trend of hybrid electric cars that get up to fifty miles to the gallon are becoming more popular. Also public transportation is very important. City dwellers that live downtown, do not need to drive their cars to work. Every major city has a form of public transportation that can get anyone around the city, and for that gallon of gas a bus burns the same five pounds reaches the atmosphere, but instead of one

Planning and development are both extremely important factors within the tourism industry and can have both positive and negative effects on the environment, local communities and tourist destinations. “Destination planning aims to limit the negative impacts of cultural tourism upon the history and lifestyles of the local community. An understanding of sustainable tourist development allows for the development of culture without loss of its authentic identity” (Maidment. T. 2012). This statement discusses the importance of planning to avoid having any negative impacts on environments and communities. Because the effects of tourism are so severe to destinations, many natural and cultural resources have been destroyed, therefore tourism planning is vital to preserve and maintain these places for future generations.