Does Ford Have Too Much Cash?

As for the combination of cash and new shares, shareholders can take part of their money

Every external factor exhibits an open door or risk that the business must address through vital activity. As one of the main five players in the worldwide car industry, Ford guarantees that it addresses the issues in its PESTLE analysis. These issues are an immediate determinant of the hierarchical advancement direction of Ford.

Despite of these good things, Ford Motor faced a loss due to some wrong decisions taken by the management regarding their business strategy. The decision of centralizing the management made them think narrowly which results in too much Americanization and ignorance of local market in the rest of the world.

Since firms incur the re-purchase option by offering $20 cash for each stock bought back, the number of outstanding shares will be reduced. The Earnings per share will increase leading to an increased stock price.

Ideas introduced in the article assist in understanding Ford’s current situation. Ford reported sharp falls in U.S. auto sales in May 2008. Sales of its most profitable pickups and SUVs suffered the most (“US Auto Sales Slide”). Some of the main

Ford’s primary resource of cash is issuing stock to shareholders. By having class A and class B shares, Ford is able to have control of the corporation in the family. They have increased given the shareholders a confidence by increasing their dividends as well. Ford need to accumulate cash because the automotive industry easily once projects start to fail. A prime example would be its failure of the car Edsel, which marked as one of the greatest flops in the world of business history.

By repurchasing stock rather than offering shareholders a higher dividend, investors will benefit from the comparatively lower capital gains tax (which can be deferred indefinitely) rather than being forced to pay a higher income tax on dividends received. By reducing the total number of shares available, the value

Since Ford management believe that the share prices were undervalued in the past few years, the implement of VEP is an effective approach to buy back part of its outstanding stocks, which is sim-ilar to share repurchases. For Ford management and family members, they are able to strengthen their control of the company. If all the Class B shareholders retained their stocks and all the $10 billion cash was disbursed to other shareholders, the percentage of Class B share would increase from 5.8% to 7.04%, and their 40% voting power will be further consolidated.

It has the option to distribute the cash in the form of dividends. Shareholders were taxed on cash dividends at ordinary income rates whereas gains realized on shares that were repurchased received capital gains treatment.

There were opportunities in India and in China to diversify the market and raise revenue for Ford Motor Company by introducing new vehicles that was suitable for their population and needs

Alan Mulally’s Restructuring of Ford Motor Company Case Study Alan Mulally received an opportunity to turn around one of the most famous brand names in the United States. Ford was struggling; losing more than 12.7 million in 2006 (Nelson p558) and desperately needed a change. Alan Mulally took the challenge, and stated he would do what many thought was impossible at the time – make Ford profitable. He did just that.

Ford was created in 1903 by Henry Ford in Detroit, MI. He quickly revolutionize the development of the automobile as a product and he also was the visionary behind the assembly line for mass production, and in turn made it possible for automobiles to become more affordable for the average household. Ford had a strong belief in his mission statement, which defines the kind of actions that are needed to fulfill organizational goal. However, Ford also had a vision statement that helped drive its global organization to reach its higher performance levels. Both areas assist in the overall foundation that Ford’s strong beliefs stand on. Both mission and vision statement are factors that solidify the success and strategic direction in the automotive industry.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In April 2005, Ford announced its intention to investigate possible strategic alternatives for Hertz. At the same time, Ford’s stock price went down significantly. This negative reaction from the market shows Ford’s lack of confidence in its future operation, since Hertz is one of the strongest subsidiaries and revenue sources for Ford. Even though Ford would lose significant value of itself in this transaction, the slump in Ford’s main business especially in North American segment and a possible downgrade of its bond rating forced them to conduct drastic financing strategy to recover itself. The company had two alternatives to rid of Hertz: selling to a private bidding group

Dividends are subjected to higher tax rate compare to capital gain increased due to share buy-back. This discourages shareholders from desire to receive high dividends in place of higher capital gain as share values increase. A comparison is made below between the proposed capital structure and dividend policy.

Profitability is vital to success for Ford Motors. A profitable business pays interest to lenders, tax to authority and dividend to shareholders and bonuses to employees in time. It helps in satisfying all the stakeholders of FM. A profitable FM creates more opportunity for growth and a growing FM will generate further profit to satisfy the stakeholders. So, this