Foreign Countries Should Not Help Out A Less Developed Country?

Instead of giving handouts, the U.S. should allow poor countries figure things out for themselves. “The American way” doesn’t work for everyone and countries, without help, should figure out what kind of system works best for them. Meanwhile, the United can use the money that is given as foreign aid on itself.

Helping out a less fortunate or country need can be to allies because now that they are a part of US territory if war may ever break out they would stand by the United States. A exponential example of the situation would be Cuba. The Cuban people were being starved by Spaniards. Previous to this Cuba has failed to gain independence on multiple occasions. The initial attempt to free Cuba was to sell the differences on paper, this method was not accomplished which lead to war. The Spanish American war was fought for four months which led to a revolution Cuba. After the United States had endorsed Cuba the whole Cuban government was

Many skeptics challenge the reasoning for investing so much money into helping so many other countries when that money could instead help us improve internal affairs. After all, foreign aid spending has increased to $50 billion a year today, which could be put towards funding education to ensure that more kids go to college and possibly affecting the innovation of the future(Morris). Giving more than you receive is nice, but when it involves a country 's financial crisis, maybe it 's best if Santa cuts back some of this year 's presents. And although the argument may be valid, lending out a helping hand can create more allies than enemies to help us in return when we need it. In fact, foreign aid only accounts for 0.5 percent of the federal budget (Stearn). Compared to all the other matters at hand that the government is worrying about, the amount of spending put into aiding poorer countries is positive in both a moral aspect and a political aspect.

Ever had that one friend? The one who tries to help, but no matter how hard he tries, he just aggravates the situation. This friend, Steve, insists he is helping, and those around, too, would support that he is indeed helping. But Steve is actually worsening the circumstances. He is like countries who provide foreign aid to less developed countries. Foreign aid, defined as “the international transfer of capital, goods, or services from a country or international organization for the benefit of the recipient country or its population,” can be military, economic, or humanitarian (“Foreign”). It is often granted to less developed countries in order to evoke government reforms or to stimulate economic growth. However, foreign aid neither elicits government reform, nor does it consistently and reliably stimulate economic growth; therefore, the United States should discontinue providing foreign economic aid.

On one side of the issue the supporters of developmental aid believe that the United States is doing more than a great job by offering economic assistance to countries that need help to develop. These individuals are aware of the unfortunate poverty levels in many countries abroad. They believe that it is the duty of the American people to help reduce the poverty levels in countries in which people live with less than a dollar a day. In fact, some supporters believe that the U.S. is not offering enough support to the poorer countries. Many have

Riddell, Roger C. 2007. Does Foreign Aid Really Work? 1st ed. OXFORD: Oxford University Press, USA.

The foreign country receiving aid needs to receive the correct type of help for them to get out of poverty. If they received affordable education and studies, they will be able to obtain skills needed to improve and stabilize their country. When they receive certain skills, they will be more prominent to get jobs to help provide for them. With better education, they will be able to form a strong country and become wealthy. The United States has many resources already, so much that the government pays farmers not to grow crops.

Many American citizens disregard or are unaware of what is happening in other less developed countries. Some lack electricity, efficient amount of food for their families, and even running, clean water. Poverty is one of the major cause of death, mostly for young children due to sickness and their families can’t afford the help they need. There are ways America is helping the undeveloped countries to improve as many people's lives as possible. Although there is more suffering than there are helping, some are working everyday to help solve the problems many are suffering so badly from.

The rich countries are inside, the poor countries are out in the water. This metaphor is feasible but invalid. The rich countries are rich for a reason. They prey on the poor countries. The relationship between the rich and poor countries is more comparable to a bank and a robber. The poor countries are the bank, the rich countries are the robber. What usually happens when a rich country discovers a resource that they want in a poorer country? They find a way to take it. They can invade the country, ‘befriend’ the country's government to control the resource indirectly, or they can sneak in and take it without the country ever knowing. Sometimes the rich country doesn’t even need the resource; they just want it for themselves. Some might argue that a rich country in today’s world would never do such a thing and that they do everything they can to help the poor countries. This is not true. If the rich countries really wanted to help the poorer countries we’d stop taking their resources and make due with our own. In order to really help the poor countries of this world we must teach them how to sustain themselves. If they never learn to do that then we might as well have just never decided to help them at

The United States does not have an obligation to help poor countries. Although the U.S. has a high gross domestic product and strong military, it still hasn’t been able to succeed in other areas. In order to help others, you need to help yourself. Until every aspect of the United States is in order, we should not supply any other countries with help. The United States also has a failing public education system, citizens with food insecurities, and aging infrastructure. Giving aid can do more harm than good to a developing country. Instead of giving handouts, the U.S. should allow poor countries figure things out for themselves. “The American way” doesn’t work for everyone and countries, without help, should figure out what kind of system

Should the United States increase foreign aid? This is a topic that has come up many

Money to the periphery countries is being funded wrongfully. I agree with James that money should be sent through ministries and nongovernmental organizations to aid in education. In Uganda the population is one of the largest fastest growing populations in the world with more than half of the population being 30 or younger. The country itself accounts for very few schools which means most of the population is not being educated. The country does not have enough money to fund schools, meaning the teachers have very low salaries. Most schools the teachers rarely even attend class because of the pay they are receiving. The dropout rates are high, and the Ugandans are left with an insufficient education. Schools are establishments that lay the foundation of a childs development. They not only teach book work and knowledge about the world but teach us how to be responsible citizens and good human beings. Education leads to enlightenment, and especially lays the foundation for a stronger

If aid gets sent to these countries, their own product loses its value. If subsidized US rice gets sent to Haiti, the Haitian rice goes down substantially in value. If the US is dumping money into these poor countries, the people begin to feel inferior and start to believe that they cannot do anything for themselves. The best way to fix the economy would probably be through education. Education has proven an effective strategy to fixing many of the worlds problems in all types of situations. Education makes women and children feel valuable and they then enter the workforce, boosting the economy. The economy is the problem and the solution in the countries entrapped with poverty. If the economy is inadequate, people cannot obtain jobs or have a fighting chance, causing poverty.

The Bottom Billion by Paul Collier discusses why the poorest countries are failing and then offers some insights and solutions to the problem. He says the four major problems in developing nations are: conflict, natural resources, bad neighbors, and bad governments. The conflicts are usually civil wars which have huge costs and the situation just becomes worse the longer the conflicts drag on. Collier states that countries rich in natural resources are often worse off than countries that are not, he attributes this problem to several different factors. One of the factors is that the resources open the possibility for conflict over the resources. Another factor is that if a country strictly focuses it’s on a specific natural resource then the other resources and industries might get forgotten and lose value. Being landlocked with bad neighbors can also be a large problem because it makes it almost impossible to be a part of world trade, so these landlocked countries have to depend on their neighbors for most of the trade and materials. A bad government can also be very destructive to a country’s economy, if they create unreasonable and restrictive policies. The smaller countries are also at a disadvantage because it is hard for them to get any investors, because the investors would much rather invest in well-known countries like India or China. After Collier stated all the problems he also offered up some possible solutions. He believed that aid agencies should concentrate

Most of the developing countries are mired deeply in economical obstacles, which prevent them from development significantly. In order to overcome those embarrassments world’s society struggles to find the efficient solution for poor countries’ economies. Historically, developed countries undertook policy of giving aid to their colonies, afterwards by the end of The Second World War the United States and United Nations embarked the global sponsorship to the developing countries and countries of the Third World due to humanitarian considerations. Since then many other countries have joined in the effort to provide financial aid to lesser developed or poverty ridden countries. But none of those countries that received an aid had experienced a prosperity phase and rapid economic growth.