Forensic Interview

Forensic psychology is one of the newest sub-specialties in psychology to be recognized by the American Psychological Association (APA). Due to television shows like Criminal Minds and CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, the career as a criminal profiler has been exemplified before our eyes as the actors create criminal profiles of the suspects that they called UNSUBs (Ward 2013). Even though these are interesting shows, they generally give us a misconception of the role of forensic psychologists. Through the development of this new aspect of psychology, a definition would be the best way to put this field into perspective. Forensic psychology is the application of psychological knowledge within the criminal justice system (Ireland 2011). A forensic

Due to the interview taking place after hours and the case not being assigned until the following day, I was unable to be present at the time of the interview. However, I have since observed a copy of that interview. The following is a summary of the forensic interview conducted that night by Megan Merrill with Deja Jones. This is a summary, not an exact transcript.

This worker had to explain that the investigation was when the children were interviewed and took to the hospital and there's an affidavit of a abuse from children's.

When assessing an infant or child for suspected child abuse Frist, the nurse needs to listen and observe, look the child's appearance, watch the behavior and interaction of the adults who accompanied the patient. Listen to the information provided while taking a history and looking for any signs or symptoms.

circumstantial evidence in child abuse case, it's difficult to tell how it occurred. In this chapter,

Testimonies from children who have experienced sexual assault can mean the difference between guilty and not guilty verdicts for the defendant. Often times child victims are psychologically and even physically harmed jeopardizing their statements during the trial. There are a number of reasons for children to be unable to give full accounts of what has occurred to them. For the purpose of protecting child victims and making sure they are heard the courts have implemented innovations that make testifying less traumatic for children and allow for a more accurate description of the assault. Hearsay testimonies are one of the innovations that have been shown to give child victims of sexual assault the chance to be fully heard. Victims directly

First and foremost as the clinician, an background description of forensic assessments should be discussed in order for understanding when discussing a specific assessment related to Ana’s case. Assessments could be used in all levels of criminal proceedings, starting with an evaluation of the clients’ level of capacity as well as evaluation of the clients’ competency to stand trial. Assessors should assess research findings that are concerning correlations between legally relevant behaviors and testing results. Generated hypotheses and test results should be confirmed a with third party data as well. Confirmation is important during this time because the client may unknowingly or knowingly present themselves in way that may help the legal

1). Forensic Psychology is the application of the theories of psychology to law and the legal system. Issues of violence and its impact on individuals and/or groups delineate the main and central concerns in Forensics within the adult, juvenile, civil, and family domains. Forensic psychologists provide advice to legislators, judges, correctional officers, lawyers, and the police. They are called upon, for example, to serve as an expert witness, diagnose and treat incarcerated and probationed offenders, and screen and evaluate personnel in the law enforcement and judicial systems. Forensics encompasses a wide range of academic orientation. Synonyms for Forensic psychologists include criminal psychologist,

3. Compare the outcome of practice the Reid Technique while interviewing a youth suspect with evidence and youth suspect without evidence.

The first step they take is receiving a report from police or child protective services. They then read the report and think of questions to ask so they can either confirm or deny that the incident took place. One thing that is super important for a forensic interviewer to have is to remain impartial. They cannot be biased at all when interviewing the child. Another thing they look at before they even start the interview is the child’s age, gender, and developmental level. BY doing this they can proceed in how they will interview the child. During the interview they can use a lot of techniques to make it go as smoothly as possible. One major technique that should be used when interviewing any child is to use open-ended questions instead of close ended questions. Closed questions give either a yes or no answer, this should not be used in a forensic interview. When using open-ended questions the interviewer is more likely to get more information than they would with a close-ended question. Many interviewers still make the mistake of using close ended questions for various reasons: some people use them because they think child is too young, they are looking for very specific details, kid needed help or didn’t understand the question. Another mistake many interviewers do is they think there can only be one initial interview. I didn’t know before watching the movie that you can do multiple interviews with a child. Many interviewers think that by doing many interviews it will weaken the case, or they will get conflicting statements, or that it will be traumatic on the child. If done properly all of these things can be easily

The first set of questions are open ended questions to inquire about what their thoughts and feelings are about each other and the situation. There is also the two circular questions to touch on each

Throughout time children have been sole witnesses of crimes either committed to them or in their presence. Leaving forensic interviewers with the burden of withdrawing reliable information in the hopes that these children can remember. Forensic interviewers are not completely aware of children’s capacities and limitations when it comes to communication, and therefore are faced to try to withhold as much information through techniques that will elicit testimony.

PER REPORTER: On 11-21-2014 during a forensic interview in the state of California with the unknown victim; the victim was asked if she had seen Gray (Bella’s bio-father) sexual abuse anyone else. The unknown victim nodded her head up and down. She was than asked “How did she know”? The unknown victim stated Gray and his ex girlfriend have two children together and he did it to his own blood child Bella. It is unknown if Bella was sexual abused in Gray’s home. It is unknown if Amanda (Bella’s mom) was aware of the abuse. Per reporter she assumes Gray and Amanda were together when the incident occurred. Per reporter during the forensic interview with the unknown victim it was said that Gray did a lot of thing to the victim. However, Gray

Since the 1970s, the plight of victims in the criminal justice system has become of significant interest and now plays a prominent role in the construction of domestic and international laws. In particular, in 1999, the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act (YJCEA hereafter) radically transformed the traditional adversarial trial model for receiving evidence from vulnerable and child witnesses by advocating a panoply of special measures to be utilised during criminal court proceedings. The purpose of such measures is to enhance the quality of children’s testimony through the use of screens to block the view of the perpetrator (s.23), the removal of wigs and gowns (s.26), help of intermediaries (s.29) and the use of video links to give evidence (s.21). Most significantly, following the recommendations in the 1989 report of the Home Office Advisory Group on video evidence - the 'Pigot Report ', s. 27 and 28 YJCEA made provisions for pre-recorded cross-examination-in-chief and pre-recorded cross-examination respectively. After all, the cross-examination of a child who is a victim of a crime, particularly a sexual crime, is arguably one of the most challenging courtroom ordeals. However, s. 28 of the YJCEA has never been brought into force and still remains to be “the most controversial of all” measures within the 1999 Act (Hoyano & Keenan, 2010). As a result, although children may be given the opportunity to pre-record the first part of their evidence, they must still

Strings of words normally added to a declarative sentence to turn the statement into a question.