Forensic Questions

week’s discussion board question. On your answer for the following question I would like to expand in further detail. Tools used for forensics investigations. What tools are needed for investigations? How do you create a forensics "toolkit?" What should it contain? I do believe that in your answer to this question you are right in saying that the tools that is need in a forensic investigators toolkit will vary from investigation to investigation. I also agree that the questions which you suggest to

------------------------------------------------- Module Five: Text Questions Review Questions 1. What is the NIBIN? The NIBIN is a network that provides law enforcement agencies around the world with access to the images and information. 2. What is rifling? What two types of markings does this produce? A rifling is a given spiral grooves by the manufacturer. This rifling or spiral grooves cut into the barrel of a gun in order to make a bullet spin as it is fired. Rifling produces grooves

1. The Forensic Readiness Plan Business of all sizes face security breaches each day due to their inability to address risks associated with information technology and mitigate security threats. As a result, the forensic readiness has become an important part of organizations’ operational structure to help respond an incident and resolve legal and regulatory issues within a minimum amount of time in the event of an incident. The Forensic Readiness Plan is a living document that organizations that

Review Questions 1.What is a questioned document? Describe at least one example of something that might be a questioned document. A questioned document is any document with handwriting or typewriting that is in question as to its authenticity. Something that might be classified as a questioned document is passports or contracts or even wills. 2.What is an exemplar? What are the best types of exemplars? Exemplars are authentic samples that are compared with the questioned document. The best

Investigations When people hear the word “forensics” it evokes a mindful of graphic, vibrant images that bring about death and crime. It’s a trigger word that reminds people of gore, autopsies, DNA, death investigations, and bullet holes. This word means so much more than just those few examples of what forensics hold. Forensics is such a broad term- it is “scientific tests or techniques used in connection with the detection of a crime”, so with that given definition forensics could mean many different things

In court, before testifying, the speaker is asked to put their hand on a bible and swear to tell the truth and nothing but the truth. When a forensic specialist is testifying in court, they often say the phrase “To a reasonable degree of scientific certainty”when presenting their analysis (Balko par.10). This phrase sounds convincing and persuasive to both the judge and the jury, but does not have any accepted meaning in the world of science and it does not give away the percent error of the analysis

One of the questions that have been presented toward the law enforcement field is whether or not forensic science should be trusted when presented as evidence in a court case. Some people believe that forensic science has evolved well enough and has now become a legitimate way to know what happened during a crime. Other people believe that it is an inaccurate method of determining what happened during a crime and that it is not appropriate to present as evidence and should rely on other methods instead

Assignment Name University Course Name Instructor’s Name Date of Submission Review Questions 1) Organizations mentioned in the chapter that provide computer forensics training i) The FBI Computer Analysis and Response Team (CART) ii) The Department of Defense Computer Forensics Laboratory (DCFL) 2) FALSE 3) Fourth Amendment 4) The triad of computing security includes: vulnerability assessment, intrusion response, and investigation. 5) Three common types of digital crime i) Financial

lecture that may not be in the textbook. There was no homework throughout the span of the course, only weekly quizzes and triweekly tests. Hardly any conversations are made between the teacher and students, but when there are questions that are either after class and short questions or they are left unanswered. Without a close student-teacher relationship in this class, there was a clear distance between the teacher and students. Throughout the course, I felt as if I was only memorizing the information

ethical violations may have experienced. We are then asked to specifically explain which guideline or guidelines can be applied to the case study. Finally we are to draw a conclusion of the case study. To summarize the case study Dr. Jones who is a forensic psychologist for the state psychiatric hospital was asked by the courts to complete a 30 day assessment evaluation on a 27 year old gentleman named Mr. Smith who has been detained and accused of murdering his girlfriend’s 3 year old child. When tried