Forensic Sciences: Article Analysis

Answer: False 3) All Pollen & Spores are produced continuously throughout the year. Answer: False 4) With the exception of bacterial endospores, pollen & spores are reproductive structures. Answer: True 5) Spores are produced only by fungi. Answer: False 6) Flowering plants or angiosperms are the only plants that produce pollen. Answer: False 7) Pollen & Spore identification can provide important trace evidence in solving crimes dues to their

In today’s lecture, Malachi Willis a graduate student currently at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro majoring in Forensic Psychology came to speak about Graduate School for Psychology. Malachi spoke about how to get into grad school and the requirements needed to be a successful applicant. He suggested that

Porsha Jenkins 2.6 Review and Critical Thinking Questions Review Questions 1.) What is physical evidence? Provide at least three examples in your answer. • Physical evidence is anything that can establish a crime has occurred and anything that links the crime to a criminal. Three examples of physical evidence are fibers, weapons, and hair. 2.) Describe three ways

Forensic science has become the greatest collective method for intelligence gathering of human identifiers. The forensic sciences are used around the world to resolve civil disputes, to justly the enforcement of criminal laws and government regulations, and to protect public health. Over the years, judges have trusted forensic methods without a second thought. DNA analysis is the most reliable method that forensic has, but how reliable is it? (Jonathan Jones, pbs). According to a group called The Innocence Project, “Misapplication of forensic science is the second most common contributing factor to wrongful convictions, found in nearly half (46%) of DNA exoneration cases” (Innocence project).

Criminal justice systems must ensure the review of the forensic science by providing standardization of the interpretation of evidence. Trusting that the system at hand which relies upon an adversary system can ensure adequate protection from faulty forensic science is unrealized (Gershman, 2007). Most importantly is the lack of checks and balances in a judicial system where according to the Bureau of Justice Department (2011), 90 to 95% of criminal cases in state and federal level are resolved by plea bargain (3). Forensic science should be validated before its use through empirical standardized, and the court system must subscribe to the ethical use of forensics to serve justice (Garrett & Neufeld, 2009). Prosecutorial misconduct contributes significantly to wrongful convictions (Joy,2006). Examples are not isolated nor rare, and conclusion coupled with unprincipled motivation requires a more stringent requirements ethics, transparency, and standardization (Joy,2006). Criminal justice systems do not identify innocent defendants, thereby losing significant factors that contribute to wrongful conviction (Gould, J. et al., 2013). Police and the courts continuously increase their reliance on forensic science to corroborate evidence, signifying the necessity for validation and standardization (Strom, K., & Hickman, M., 2015). However, we must embrace that flawed forensics impacts our criminal justice system and can contribute to the death of the innocent. Blind faith in a proven imperfect system jeopardizes

Defense counsel has asked this Court to compel the government to disclose the Forensic Peer Review dated August 5, 2014, from the government’s digital evidence file. Defense counsel asserts that the requested document is discoverable under Brady because the document will provide impeachment evidence of the test results obtained by Digital evidence examiner, Gregory Norman (“Norman”) using the Lantern v4 tool. To support its’ contention, defense counsel notes that there is no distinction between exculpatory and impeachment evidence for purposes of Brady disclosure requirements. See Bagley, 473 U.S. 667; Kyles, 514 U.S. at 433 (citing there is no “difference between exculpatory and impeachment evidence” when it comes to the prosecutor's duty

More shockingly the justice department and FBI have formally acknowledged that virtually every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which evidence was supplied against criminal defendants in the period of 20 years prior to 2000. In a group of 28 examiners with the FBI Laboratory 26 have been confirmed to overstating matches in microscopic hair comparison in favor of prosecutors. This was seen in 95 percent of the 268 trials that have been reviewed so far in accordance to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the Innocence Project. The errors in the FBI’s conduct does not mean that there was no other evidence of the convict’s guilt, however federal and state prosecutors

If flaws in testing techniques become noticeable and extreme action is not taken to control these issues, society will begin to test the validity of “forensics” as a whole. Referring back to the Motherisk case where a lack of education and professionalism took place, people began to question the science of hair testing and the reliability of investigators, and because of this many cases involving this particular laboratory had to be reevaluated (1). Employees in the Motherisk case were not informed that they were considered expert witnesses in the cases they took part in, and part of their job was to also maintain a bias free work zone, these are crucial mistakes which can lead the way for many wrongful convictions (1). The Motherisk case also demonstrated the importance of judges playing an important role in raising issues of reliability of evidence where people in question simply cannot afford it (1). Prior to final decisions judges should have all the evidence regarding the specimen of hair and the pros and cons of assessing this as a valid science (1). Only the best sciences should ever be considered in the courts. In the courts “hard science” should always be picked rather than a “soft science” because it is scientific proof (1). Hair follicle testing may one day become one of the easiest methods of testing, and will allow

Luisa Idrovo Soc 121-002 The Death Penalty In April of 2015, the field of forensic science suffered a major shock after the FBI announced that the hair analysis testimony that it had used to investigate criminal suspects was flawed. legal scholar Tucker Carrington stated that the FBI hair analysis being performed was “magic”, it was considered that because its hair analysis investigations were unscientific. The evidence that was presented on trial was considered to be unreliable. In about 95% of cases it was discovered that analysts stated their conclusion in order to favor prosicuters. False testemonies occurred in over 100 trials, including 32 death penalty cases. But FBI was not done with their announcements, they also revealed that

Forensic Science, also known as Forensics, is the application of science to law. It uses highly developed technology to uncover scientific evidence in a variety of fields. Modern forensic science has a broad range of applications. It is used in civil cases such as forgeries, fraud or negligence. The most common use of forensic science is to investigate criminal cases involving a victim, such as assault, robbery, kidnapping , rape, or murder. Forensic science is also used in monitoring the compliance of various countries with such international agreements as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the Chemical Weapons Convention and to learn whether a country is developing a secret nuclear weapons program. It can help Pathology is the branch of forensic science that determines the nature and course of diseases by analyzing body fluids and tissues. Pathology is divided into clinical and anatomic pathology. Clinical pathologists contribute to the diagnosis of diseases by measuring chemicals and cells in blood, sputum, bone marrow and urine. Anatomic pathologists perform autopsies and analyze tissues taken from patients during surgery or by biopsy. The medical examiner investigates many different types of violent crime to determine whether a violent death was an accident, a suicide, or a homicide. In cases involving gunshot wounds, the medical examiner looks for gunpowder residues on the clothing of the victim and around wounds. The information is used to determine whether the gun was fired by the victim of by someone else. In the case of knife wounds, the medical examiner must distinguish between a cut (an injury that is longer than deep) and a stab wound (an injury

As a forensics investigator before you start any investigation, one main factor he or she has to consider is to define and identify the nature of any particular case. In order to determine the best way possible to approach my case, one of my main tasks would be to gather as much information possible from my client. That would involve getting a detailed description of the events and environment where the case took place. This job requires measuring my client’s background and computer skills level. The purpose of obtaining the information is to identify her technical knowledge, and discover how the files got into her computer and also whether she had the purpose or intentions of accessing the files mentioned. I would move forward with my investigation

Forensic Science is essential to the field of law because it involves the use of science to solve an investigation. Forensic Science can be divided into many different categories depending on what is required for each career. I believe paramedics, fingerprint experts, and

Nearly anyone you ask would be familiar with the television show CSI. The crime lab is colorful and high-tech with all of the fun toys and machines that analysts use to test the ever abundant amount of forensic evidence from every crime scene. It makes for an exciting drama that

In general terms, forensic science is basically applying science or scientific knowledge to the rules of law either by definition or enforcement of them, but with the growing changes in society, it is should start to rely on the rules of laws to maintain order and stability within our society. The application of science to the laws are becoming much more common now that government agencies are realizing that it is important to monitor and view such activities that influence our lifestyles and how we live. Also, it is essentially hard to plan or produce any food, drug regulations, or environmental protection acts that can be monitored or enforced without the applications of scientific technology or any other such applications within the scientific

Forensic science is a science application to answer questions of interest to the legal system