Forgiveness In The Sunflower By Simon Wiesenthal

When it comes to the topic of Simon Wiesenthal not forgiving a dying SS soldier for his crimes, most of us will readily agree that it’s a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of if Wiesenthal should have forgiven the soldier. Whereas some are convinced that he made the right choice in not forgiving the soldier, others maintain that he should have let the soldier die peacefully, guilt free, and forgiven. I agree with Wiesenthal’s decision to not forgive the dying SS soldier because he cannot speak for all the other Jews who have been killed by this man. In Simon Wiesenthal’s book, The Sunflower, he asks the reader what they would have done in his position with the SS soldier. If I was Wiesenthal, I wouldn’t have forgiven the man as I cannot make decisions for others and because the soldier was not sincere in his apology for the crimes he was involved in.

Forgiveness has a different context depending on where the person is from or what he believes. Religion places a great emphasis on the view of forgiveness.

Forgiveness is not just practiced by saints and not only benefits its recipients but have strong connection with person’s physical, mental and spiritual health. It plays a great role in the health of families, communities and nations. Forgiveness provides common ground for love, acceptance, harmony and true happiness Most spiritual and religious leaders of the world will agree that forgiveness of oneself and others is one way to clear the mind, heart and soul and may result in a feeling of increased peace and happiness.

In Simon Wiesenthal’s The Sunflower, he recounts his incidence of meeting a dying Nazi soldier who tells Simon that he was responsible for the death of his family. Upon telling Simon the details, Karl asks for his forgiveness for what he helped accomplish. Simon leaves Karl without giving him an answer. This paper will argue that, even though Karl admits to killing Simon’s family in the house, Simon is morally forbidden to forgive Karl because Karl does not seem to show genuine remorse for his committed crime and it is not up to Simon to be able to forgive Karl for his sins. This stand will be supported by the meaning of forgiveness, evidence from the memoir, quotes from the published responses to Simon’s moral question, and arguments from

The idea of justice should be based on the idea of forgiveness. A popular attempt at achieve justice is to “forgive and forget”, however this idea is not the best method. To forgive means to recognize that someone has done something wrong and is attempting to fix it, and in turn, you must accept this attempt in order to move forward. Holding grudges is a part of the Human Condition in the sense that we struggle to get over instances of people wronging us, instead of getting over it, we deeply desire revenge. However this is something that we must move past in order to reach true justice.

Forgiveness is not ours to give but either is condemning a soul. Both are left to the divine. Each can forgive deeds done to himself, but can never forgive crimes against humanity, against a group. He can never forgive on the behalf of so many especially when what has effect many is so horrific. It is also not up to use dish out such judgment to them to make one suffer as you have. What is left? If you can forgive him on behalf of so many, and you can not bring him to justice? What is left? Only Silence is what you can provide.

In all actuality is forgiveness more of a resolution for one person to move forward, or does it fix the situation as a whole. The Sunflower, is a book that presents an idea of forgiveness and others opinions on what should happen in this case of events. Karl a dying SS man, brings in Simon a prisoner in a concentration camp to his hospital room, and asks Simon for forgiveness. Karl is guilt ridden for his killings during his time as a soldier, and wants to die confessing and seeking forgiveness from Simon. Simon however has never known Karl before their meeting, and Karl has never committed anything towards Simon. Simon struggles and is indecisive on whether he should forgive Karl or not. Saying sorry for murdering people during the Holocaust, is impossible given the damage of the event, but for Karl he searched for forgiveness through Simon. Simon being imprisoned in a concentration camp and brought to Karl, a dying SS man, Karl wanted to seek forgiveness for his actions. Being in the position Simon was in he was not entitled to take the apology on behalf of others, when he was not wronged against by Karl.

What inherent value does forgiveness hold? Who benefits from forgiveness? Must forgiveness be explicitly stated, or can a person be forgiven silently? When does someone have the right to forgive an individual? In the book The Sunflower by Simon Wiesenthal, the author, a Holocaust survivor, recounts an experience with an SS soldier, named Karl, on his deathbed asking Wiesenthal, a Jewish prisoner, for forgiveness for his inhumane actions, telling his tale with brutal detail. Wiesenthal neither forgives nor condemns the dying man, but instead leaves wordlessly. This experience has discomforted Wiesenthal greatly, and he grappled with if what he had done was the right choice or not. At the end of the book, Wiesenthal poses a question, what

Opponents argue that forgiving someone who has committed a crime would be one of the toughest things to do for a person. They believe it would be very difficult to forgive soldiers for what they had done because they people they killed were part of their friends and family. How can they forgive someone who was so beloved to them. In the book, "The Sunflower" Sven Alkalaj argues that we don't have the right to forgive a person on someone else's behalf. For example, Simon couldn't forgive Karl because he killed someone else’s family member. Karl did not have the right to forgive on behalf of those families. As a result, Simon left the room without saying any word to Karl because Simon knew that Karl committed crimes and also asking the wrong

Forgiveness can be a simple gesture. Either way it’s a difficult task to complete. Nevertheless it’s easier to pry forgiveness from certain groups of people; especially children. Children tend to easily forgive since they do not fully comprehend the severity of a situation. This theory especially applies to the parent-child relationship where the child feels the need to forgive their parents no matter the situation. Forgiveness for the parent seems mandatory to the child considering the parent is the teacher of life to their child; what the parents say and/or do is all their knowledge of how the world goes. In The Glass Castle Jeannette Walls proves this theory correct. Numerous times Jeannette forgives her parents for their wrongdoings and

Forgiveness is to stop feeling angry, to stop blaming someone for the way they made a person feel, and stop feeling victims of whatever wickedness was directed towards them. Is forgiveness necessary? Can everyone be forgiven despite the circumstances? If forgiveness depends on the situation, then is it necessary at all? Does forgiveness allow someone to continue their life in peace? Is forgiving someone who causes physical pain to someone, as a pose to forgiving someone who murdered a member of the family the same? If someone can forgive one of these acts so easily can the other be forgiven just as easy? Forgiveness allows for someone to come to terms with what they have experienced. In the case of murder forgiveness is necessary because

Victims in large scale crimes have observed that most perpetrators show no remorse or regret for their evil actions when they are carrying them out, even justifying them at times. This attitude can drastically change when the person is on their deathbed. Harry James Cargas is a scholar and author best known for his research on the Holocaust and Christianity, and he wrote an essay in response to Wiesenthal’s questions in The Sunflower. He touches on this subject of repentance coming too late, saying, “Deathbed conversions are dramatic but in many instances they are too easy” (Cargas 125). In other words, Cargas is saying that a person can participate in horrible crimes in their lifetimes, and then quickly have a change of heart on their deathbed. Some say that sort of conversion is too easy and does not show genuine remorse. Moshe Bejski is another author who responded in The Sunflower and would agree with Cargas on this matter. Bejski was an Israeli judge and a Holocaust survivor himself. At one point in his essay, he is discussing some of the crimes that Nazis committed against humanity, using methods of extermination that had never been thought of before. He then speaks directly of the SS soldier that asked Weisenthal for forgiveness, writing, “Only the awareness of imminent and certain death induced Karl to think that his actions had been crimes against both humanity and God” (Bejski 113). In this passage, Bejski is explaining his belief that only fear of impending death moved Karl to confess his sins and seek forgiveness. He even goes on to say that had Karl not been wounded, he would have continued to participate in murdering millions of innocent people, just as his fellow soldiers did. When faced with the prospect of death, it is natural for many people to desire forgiveness for the wrongs they have committed in order to find inner peace

The concept of forgiveness remains to be a debatable issue in the field of philosophy and morality. For some, to forgive someone who has wronged you considers you as a person with morally good characteristics e.g. having a kind and merciful heart. Forgiving is somewhat a way of undoing what has been done, but for Kant, such concept is impossible. This is because he believes that even God cannot undo what has been done, because we do not have the ability to change what He thinks of us or plead for His mercy (North 1987, p. 500). It seems that the only way to wipe our slate clean is to compensate for the harm that we have caused or receive punishment for our sins. If this is so, then it is possible for God to forgive the wrongdoers and be willing

We as humans tend to feel resentful towards those who have hurt us and we tend to keep that bitterness inside of us when we remember the undesirable action others have made that have impacted our lives. A way to overcome the feeling of resentment or revenge on people who have done us wrong is to forgive. Forgiveness helps get rid of any hard feelings that occupies our mind and heart and allows us to move forward in life. People who forgive tend to be more satisfy inside than those who keep grudges. That anguish feeling of not forgiving only leads to arguments, and more conflicts, even war. In The Sunflower, the author Simon Wiesenthal, a Jewish Austrian Holocaust survivor, shares his personal struggle of keeping silent when Karl, an SS soldier,

Forgiveness should be a gift which you give yourself. When you feel that forgiveness is necessary, do not forgive for “their” sake.