Form, Tohuw (H8414)
To me, the word form means shape or structure. However, according to strong’s concordance that is not what the root word appears to mean. The use of the word in Genesis 1, does not at all seem to coincide with its etymological root. The word is interesting because it is not used quite like its root word, meaning, “to lie waste.” This could change the meaning of the passage, such as in Genesis 1:2 where it talks about when the earth was without form. To say that the earth was to lie waste…what does that mean? The earth was destined to waste away? As said before, it is completely different. In the Bible, the word is used in a variety of different ways. It is first used when there is a lack of form to the earth. I do realize
…show more content…
It is used as a word for breath or wind or spirit of the Lord God. It is also used as a word for the wind of heaven. It’s quite powerful if you ask me. As a kid, I always thought of God as a friendly, invisible, giant. He was always there. To me, that was the term spirit. That’s what it meant…invisible God. This word occurs with a much deeper meaning. It is the presence of his breath. The outline also talks about it being a wind of heaven. Again, a breath of God, straight from heaven is what is accounted for in P’s version of Genesis. It makes P’s God sound so much more relatable than …show more content…
It comes from a root meaning to glisten, or be green. I always thought of herbs as a small plant, ground up for spice, or pulled apart for “healing practices” or even substituted for medicines. To me, a glistening, green plant just makes the garden sound so much more vibrant and colorful. In Genesis God refers to the all herb-yielding seeds, or all seeds that create anything glistening and green. In my head, this paints a picture of perfection, which is exactly what the Garden of Eden was…perfect. Each plant was a perfect shade of green and it probably glistened in the sunlight so perfectly that it was overwhelming and beautiful. This is seen in Genesis 1:12 “And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.” Each seed brings forth a green and glistening plant of it’s own. (I do realize that I am over using the words green and glistening, but it super excites me). This word, as I have explained, really enhances the picture of the garden. However, it is a word not used in newer versions of the creation story such as, NIV and MSG. While the earth does seem vibrant and beautiful in other versions, the work plant will never again be a suitable substitute for
Almighty (Genesis 17: 1-4). He is seen as divine entity, who knows all and sees all. In this aspect
When Stephen visits Sachi’s garden for the first time, he finds that “There were no trees, flowers, or water, only a landscape made of sand, stones, rocks, and some pale green moss . . . Sachi had created mountains from arranged rocks, surrounded by gravel and elongated stones flowing down like a rocky stream leading to a lake or the sea” (40). Unlike Matsu’s very green and tree-filled garden, Sachi’s garden is very dry, and simplistic, yet has a peculiarly admirable feeling when one is able to see the subtle details. Although it is very different from a typical garden, its components harmonize to create a new and beautiful pattern. At first, Stephen is overwhelmed by the unfamiliar concept of a dry landscape, but after taking it in, he says it is beautiful. This garden is has a fresh taste to it, leaving Stephen to decide the effect it has on him, whether it be positive or negative. When creating the garden, Sachi insisted that it should not have flowers. However, eventually, “between two large rocks grew a neat cluster of blooming flowers, startlingly beautiful, a splash of blue-purple . . . thriving among the muted, gray stones.” The way that the bright colors contrast against the dull gray shows that something unfamiliar and novel can appear beautiful in its own way. Since Sachi’s garden is filled with pebbles and stones, the dainty flowers stand out comely, and to
hope for growing into flourishing plants. One of the seeds had a gardener who loved and
with his creation and how great and loving God is. This analogy represents different things in the
The poet tells about “The Almighty making of the earth, shaping beautiful plains, marked off by oceans, then proudly setting the sun and moon to glow across the land and light it” (7-10). In the Bible, Genesis 1:1 reads, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”
Charlotte Perkins Gilman illustrates this longing through a garden in which the protagonist is unable to reach throughout the entire story. A garden that represents the freedom the protagonist is unable to have. A garden has been a symbol for centuries, as it is one of the first items mentioned in the Bible, the Garden of Eden. It is a symbol of earthly paradise (Chevalier & Gheerbrant 418) in which Adam and Eve were given, but it was short lived, because of their banishment.
God- A giant lightbulb, an orb of ever radiant light which sits atop an unmovable throne in Heaven. Personifies reason and his responses seem cold as a result. Omnipotent being. A chorus like figure in Milton’s poem.
For the Tanakh, for rabbinic literature, and for important strands in Jewish mysticism, God has always been a corporeal
The Book of Genesis is a compilation, and like every compilation it has a wide variety of contributors who, in turn, have their individual influence upon the final work. It is no surprise, then, that there exist certain parallels between the Theogony, the cosmogony of the early Greeks, and the Book of Genesis, the first part of the Pentateuch section of the Bible. In fact, arguments may be made that the extent of this 'borrowing', as it were, is not limited to Genesis; the Theogony has its own roots in Greek mythology, predating the Book of Genesis by a thousand years. A superficial examination of this evidence would erroneously lead one to believe that Genesis is somewhat a collection of older mythology
Further evidence that the author of Genesis 1 is P is that “the account of creation in Genesis 1 has the refrains and solemn tones of a liturgical prayer…it maintains an interest in precise genealogy lists, a task of ancient temple scribes,” and pays close attention to structure and the repetition of key expressions, having a powerful effect on the reader, a style of writing that would only have been used by the well educated at the time, pointing directly to priests.
We are introduced to the Forms in Plato’s dialogue the Phaedo. The Theory of Forms says that
This poem is generally a pantheism statement exemplified since it equates nature to be having the same powers as God. The poet indeed starts off by stating clearly that "The groves were God's first temples. Ere man learned" an indication that if man is inferior to God, yet God used nature
• Impersonal – an Impersonal view of God’s perception is that God is some form of spirit or force, not particularly there for you personally
"For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that
The Holy Spirit of God is the driving divine force that assisted God with the creation of the things on the earth. Gen. 1:1-2, (KJV), records the first account of the Holy Spirit in the Old Testament. In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth and the earth was without form and void; and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. In addition, Ps. 33:6 records that the Word of the Lord made the heavens and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth. After God created the earth as a habitation, He created man in His own image and likeness.