Form and Structure of a Servant to Two Masters Essay

I will show understanding of the plot, character and themes and Shakesperes use of language and dramatic devices within the play.

Making a movie to be watch worthy for a good book is almost rare. Nevertheless, it is common to hear those who like reading to pries a movie, which made based on a book that they read. Yet, when it comes to William Shakespeare, it is different because the plies that he wrote are just a ready script for acting. Julius Caesar is one of Shakespeare’s most famous plays because of many reasons and one of them is that the real story was a critical point in history. In fact, the play reflects an actual occasion of Shakespeare’s time and that is one way this great writer express the concerns of the people about the succession, as Professor of English literature at University of St. Thomas, Ann Bradley says. In this essay, I will examine some of the

This essay is an exploration of the play Much Ado About Nothing, and the gender roles involved in the deceit and trickery that transpire and develop throughout the story. As gender is one of the main themes in the plot, identifying the expected gender roles of the characters, and how the contrast between characters highlights these expected roles. In Shakespeare 's time, known as the Elizabethan Era, men and women’s roles and expectations were starkly different. Elizabethan women, no matter what social class, were inferior to men. A female’s role in the family was to get married so they could increase their family 's wealth and power and to produce heirs. Men, on the other hand, had all of the power within a household. Males were expected

I will be studying the fight scene where Mercutio and Tybalt die, and comparing, the two film versions of the play, I will find differences and similarities as well as describing how each director / producer interprets and makes their version of the film. I will describe how eight different factors are present in each version of the film:

Two films, both alike in content, set in fair Verona, where the directors laid out their scene, one created by Franco Zeffirelli in 1968 and the other by Baz Luhbrmann in 1996. Both cinematic, both staying true to the plot and dialogue, each one radically different than the other, Zeffirelli sets his film within historical actuality, while Luhbrmann presents his with a modern twist. A story of love, revenge and death, revolving around a pair of star-crossed lovers, interpreted differently, but presented in the same form.

People still admire Shakespeare and create modern versions of his work. The play version of his work made it clear that it is possible to modernize Shakespeare's work, and make it humorous in a way people can understand. Not many people may know this, but Shakespeare's words are expressions some still use to this very day. An example of an expression Shakespeare used that is used today is “break the ice.” This expression does not mean to literally break ice, but to get to know someone and get comfortable with them. No one needs to explain what that means because it is a common phrase, and that just shows how Shakespeare is still relevant

This director’s choice shows that both directors cherished and respected Shakespeare's written text. In Zeffirelli’s film, the dialogue fits in with the other aspects of the film, such as the costumes and set. since everything is traditional, but what is interesting is that the actors manage to sound very natural and comfortable with the dialogue. They managed to convey strong emotion with help of the text and entirely transformed into the characters. Since, Zefferelli's version both includes the traditional sets, costumes, and language it makes it easy for the audience to understand the original play, the film is straightforward and does not contradict the original play, making the film a credible resort for those who want to have a better understanding of the story. Unlike Zeffirelli’s version, Luhrmann’s costumes and set do not suit the dialogue, making the Shakespearean dialogue in his version both strange to watch and hear, another odd aspect is that at times the characters did not precisely mean what they were saying, for instance, when a character was talking about their sword, they were actually talking about their guns named sword, consequently, this made the dialogue confusing to follow at times. Nevertheless, the actors in both films managed to execute an admirable performance and did Shakespeare's text

The differences in styles of language truly brings alive the plays' various characters, from the lowliest drawer to the noblest knight. The playwright's audience would have been composed of a similarly diverse spectrum of society, from the groundlings at the foot of the stage, to the members of the court in attendance, and these disparate members of the audience might very well have come away from the plays with different interpretations of

The overall dramatic meaning of this play has been successfully shown by the elements of drama. The

The play ‘Othello’ written by Shakespeare in approximately 1603 is a Greek tragedy with the tragic hero as Othello who is associated with the other main characters, Iago, Desdemona, Cassio and Emilia. Similarly, a movie of the 21st century with the same story line that of the Shakespearean play, which was written by Tim Blake had been produced in the late 1990’s and published in 2001. The features of the play ‘Othello’ are delineated by the movie ‘O’ in a more contemporary approach with new characters in order to suit the modern viewers. Both the play and the movie depict the downfall of a good person (Othello and Odin) through some fatal errors or misjudgments, producing suffering and insight on the part of the protagonist and arousing fear

changing attitudes toward life and the other characters in the play, particularly the women; and his reflection on the

Leaders believe people have an intrinsic value beyond tangible contributions as workers. As a result, genuine interest in the spiritual, professional and personal growth of all employees is demonstrated.

To get us started, how do the roles and identities of women in this play compare to that of the male figures?

The production relates to the time period it was set in through its representation of stock characters. The characters were portrayed to resemble characters from the Italian Renaissance theatre style known as Commedia dell’arte. In this style, the whole performance is improvised without a script and in this version of Servant of Two Masters it has a set script. This is the reason why I don’t believe it relates to how it was written. However, the stock characters were used as guidelines for how the actors did improvise. Stock characters are meant to be recurring characters that audiences recognize just from how they are portrayed. They are easy targets for a satire performance. The point of these characters is to move the story along without having to explain to the audience who they are. In Servant of Two Masters, stock characters were unmasked and consisted of young

Third, was thought, which was used to show the characters’ motives, either through soliloquy or direct conversation. After those came diction, song and spectacle, which were used to contribute to the unity of the play’s plot.