Formulate The Major Arguments About Aspartame

In addition to the scientific, non-lethal hydrolyzed metabolites of aspartame, series of tests have been done over two decades on humans and animals to investigate the safety of aspartame. Over 23 years, the FDA has tested and affirmed the safety of aspartame throughout 200 studies . Furthermore, the product is used in more than 100 countries and 100 million people around the world . In addition to the FDA studies, the American Dietetic Association, the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) of the World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization, the Scientific Committee on Food and the European Union (SCF), and other regulatory agencies worldwide have reviewed and approved the safety of aspartame . The most recent

Aspartame is the most common and one of three alternative sweeteners in the United States which can be found in more than 6,000 products and is consumed by more than 200 million people around the world (Calorie Control, 2015). You will find these man-made sweeteners in many reduced calorie foods; such as, jams and jellies, powdered soft drinks, maple syrups, chewing gum, juice blends, frozen desserts, cereals, hard candy and the most popular of products being sodas. Aspartame is also seen in little pink packets of Sweet & Low on restaurant tables. Besides being found in vitamins its important use is in many low-calorie and sugar-free beverages and

In addition to aspartame in diet soda contributing to cancer, it also causes memory loss. Carbonated beverages began containing aspartame in 1983, after the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it (Gold, 1995). Aspartame contains 40% aspartic acid, which is an amino acid that increases the level of aspartate and glutamate in blood plasma, according to Gold (1995). This increase of aspartate, as explained by Gold (1995), causes over stimulation of the nerves by acting within the brain as neurotransmitters, which aid in sending and receiving information between neurons. Aspartate increases the possibility of destroying the cell surface’s membrane on the opposite side of the area between nerve cells (where transmission of nerve impulses occur) in the brain (Humphries, Prestorius, & Naude, 2008). As a result, excessive aspartate or glutamate can slowly destroy neurons in the brain contributed by an influx of calcium contained in the cells, thus causing memory loss.

Artificial sweeteners such as aspartame are commonly used as substitutes for sugar in everyday products that we consume such as foods and soft drinks due to the fact that they contain no calories. This has further led to a growing trend of artificial sweeteners being used by people as an alternative to sugar to control weight. Although extensive research has demonstrated the safety of six different low-calorie sweeteners currently approved for use, there is still ongoing debate over the potential health threats they pose.

What is Sucralose one might ask? Sucralose is an artificial sweetener that is used as a replacement for sugar by drink companies and diet companies. Sucralose is located in any drink with a diet label. These sugar substitutes are can cause a large problem and the real question, is the consumption of sucralose really worth it? It is necessary to implement a healthier option to prevent the high risk of health problems associated with sucralose like obesity and diabetes. Though this will not be an easy decision as In this essay I will discuss the effect of Splenda on our bodies, arguments for the use of sucralose, and other affordable solutions to diet products in order to prohibit the selling of “sugar free” drinks in ERHS.

Aspartame is a toxicin to the people who consume it. At least that’s what the critics say. Zero calorie artificial sweeteners reputation has been degraded due to people criticizing all of the “dangers” that can come from the consuming of these products. These allegations come from people who, more than often, lack any credibility or proof of these dangers involved with artificial sweeteners. The truth is artificial sweeteners, such as aspartame, are not as dangerous but are just as good as natural sugars. Aspartame is actually the most researched sweetener to date and has been scientifically proven that it has no negative effect towards depression, cancer, and people with a “sensitivity” to aspartame.

This research study focuses on how aspartame affects the human body, particularly the brain. It includes the different classes of sweetener, their characteristics and their difference from aspartame. It also explains why multi-national corporations prefer to use aspartame as sugar substitute over the other varieties of sweeteners. Lastly, it details the compatibility of aspartame to beverages and the standard amount of sweeteners in instant goods set by the World Government. However, this study does not cover the possible sources of treatment to the problems caused by aspartame. This research is limited to explaining the overall concept of aspartame as a sweetener.

Aspartame is an artificial sweetener used in diet drink like Coke. It is a sweetener having 200 times sweetness as compared to sugar. This sweetener is usually sold in the name of NutraSweet and Equal. Since the approval of aspartame in soda by the Food and Drug Administration authority of United States, issues arise that it may cause serious health risk like cancer and premature birth. Artificial sweetener aspartame in soda has been a concern for safety to the consumers.

Aspartame is about 200 times sweeter than sugar (Magnuson 633). Many foods are reduced in calories from aspartame. Aspartame is created by joining aspartic acid and phenylalanine, and a little bit of methanol (Magnuson 633). Aspartic acid and phenylalanine are naturally found in many foods and. Phenylalanine is an amino acid found in many foods. Ingesting certain amounts of phenylalanine can build up in the blood. This can cause other chemicals from getting to the brain that are important for function. Aspartame is digested just like any other protein (Magnuson 645). Aspartame breaks down into its basic components and is absorbed in the blood (Magnuson 645). Aspartame does not build up in the body over time. The FDA has concluded that aspartame is safe for the general public, including people with diabetes, woman that are pregnant or nursing, and young children. Aspartame is one of the most watched and studied agents in food. It has been tested over 100 times before the FDA approved of it in 1981. Many studies have looked for the health effects in animals when fed aspartame.

Ever since the basic principles of chemistry became apart of human knowledge, scientists have been fascinated with understanding the physical and chemical properties of novel compounds. The prevalent use of artificial sweeteners, (a group of synthetically manufactured compounds with no caloric value) as table sugar alternatives in many of today’s commercially traded goods is an example of applying chemistry to generate novelty. However, the biological effects associated with their consumption remains shrouded in public misconceptions.1 As a result, the consumption of artificially sweetened beverages (ASB) has become the emphasis for many obesity and neurological related clinical studies. Does the consumption of aspartame have adverse effects on body mass and neurological activity in humans?

First, the author assumes that the dietary goals for all people is losing weight. The author states that the artificial sweetener aspartame is better than sugar because it is more helpful in losing weight. If people's dietary goal is to gain weight or keep in shape with no weight change, people are more likely to achieve

Artificial sweeteners can replaces a lot of things like corn syrup. Artificial sweeteners are also called sugar substitutes, they are 30 to 8,000 times sweeter than sugar but have fewer calories. Sugar has four calories per gram and the sweeteners have zero calories per gram. According to the National Cancer Institute, there is no scientific evidence that any of the artificial sweeteners can cause cancer. It is very common that you consume a lot of aspartame people often get headaches. So artificial

There has been many debates on whether aspartame is good for us or not. In the 1960s James Schlatter, a chemist working for the G.D Searle company, was working on creating a cure for stomach ulcers and accidently tasted it off of his fingers (Evangelista, n.d.). Little did he know that his “cure” would become a popular artificial sweetner in America. The chemical additive consists of, phenylalaine and aspartic acid, two amino acids, as well as methanol (Wells, 2011). Aspartame is popular for people who want to lose or maintain a healthy weight. Since it is 200 times more sweet than actual sugar a lot less calories are needed in order to have the same sweet taste (International Food Information Council Foundation, 2011). Aspartame is found

Ever since artificial sweeteners have begun being commercially used their safety has been called into question. Aspartame has been accused of being carcinogenic after an animal study. In this study the specimens being observed were introduced to aspartame at doses similar to what humans frequently consume. The specimens that were introduced to aspartame had a higher incidence of leukemia and lymphomas than those who were not.

Based on my findings in the two given articles, I am choosing to support the safety of sucralose as a nonnutritive sweetener. As mentioned in the article, “ Sweeteners Facts and Fallicies,” there is little research on the effects of sucralose in the human systems. In fact, it wasn’t until I did my own search of sucralose in the database that I realized just how limited recent studies, or studies as a whole for that matter, were in terms of effects on humans. Majority of research, much of which was used in the determination of consumption safety, was performed on lab rats. As a consumer, opting heavily for the nonnutritive sweetener, “Splenda,” I find it extremely unsettling that there isn’t more extensive data on the direct effects that the