Fossil Fuels Vs Alternative Energy

Lead, hydrogen fluoride and chloride, methanol, formaldehyde, and ethylene glycol are hazardous air pollutants, however they are used in the fracking fluid (Waxman, et al., 2011). Methane is one of many gases that are relevant to the greenhouse effect on Earth. Methane traps 20 times more heat than carbon dioxide (Merrill, 2013). Too much of something is never a good thing so too much methane would be highly dangerous to the human population along with a lot of other living organisms on the

Climate change, specifically in reference to C02 Emissions released by human use of fossil fuels and their consequential effects on the environment, is perhaps one of the most pressing issues we, not just as Americans, but as human beings face in our lifetimes. Though it may sound like a sensationalist statement the facts are hard to deny. In May of 2013, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Emissions are gases and particles that are released into the atmosphere. This is caused by burning fuels and other processes. Even though humans contribute most air emissions, animals can also contribute a portion of carbon dioxide and methane into the air through digestive processes. The primary sources of emissions in the United States, which are released by human beings and natural sources, are carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane gas, hexafluoride, and halocarbons. Halocarbons and hex fluoride come as a direct result of man-made inventions (What are Emissions? n.d.). China accounts for about 7% of all world greenhouse gas emissions and is the fourth largest country source behind the Soviet Union, Brazil, and the United States. About three-fourths of China’s emissions are from the production and conversion of coal. They are willing to cooperate in reducing the use of coal because it is the major source of acid rain and air

According to Rediff Business (2013), the United States is ranked number one in worldwide oil consumption. As of 2012, the U.S. was using 19,150,000 barrels

More than 95% of scientists agree that fossil fuels does and will continue to cause Earth's temperature to rise to an unhealthy extent. Prohibiting (or greatly limiting) the use of fossil fuels will help not only the environment but also our economies and society. By setting a global standard, we can gradually decrease our dependence on these harmful gasses. However, nations and corporations reluctance to comply with these proposed regulations will eventually cause a global catastrophe. If the only way to prove that this unwillingness can be detrimental to the globe's health is by showing them the consequences firsthand, then the next generation will be negatively impacted by our

Alternative energy versus fossil fuels is a very controversial issue surrounding America today. The issue is so controversial for many reasons, such as our economic dependence on fossil fuels and the possibility of global warming due to the burning of these fossil fuels we are so dependent on. Where one argument seems to succeed in persuading the reader one way, another rebuttal can be made that will neutralize the arguments before it. If the United States become more alternative energy dependent, it could destroy thousands of jobs, or it could save the US’s economy.

Since the twentieth century, there has been a growing movement to conserve and improve the environment. Issues such as holes in the ozone layer and raising temperatures can be traced to the world’s use of fossil fuels. In John Schwartz’s article “Another Inconvenient Truth: It’s Hard to Agree How to Fight Climate Change,” Schwartz states that over 195 countries attended a meeting in Paris, France to discuss the best methods for improving the environment. Although the countries agreed saving the environment must become a priority, there was still debate on the appropriate procedures to solve the negative effects of climate change. Nuclear power, natural gas, and working with fossil fuel companies are three highly contested issues, and Schwartz explains each side’s arguments as to why their solution is best.

Carbon dioxide, the chief byproduct of fossil fuel combustion, is a potent greenhouse gas that remains in the atmosphere indefinitely. In the U.S., the burning of coal for electricity pumps more than 2.4 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year, according to the Energy Information Administration. People ask what about the cars? How do they affect the environment? The average American passenger car spits out 11,450 pounds of carbon dioxide every year. There are 246 million cars in the U.S. To cut down on carbon dioxide emissions, governments, car manufacturers and utility companies have been seriously pursuing alternative energy sources. Among the leading contenders are biofuels - renewable, clean-burning fuels made from plant- and animal-based source materials like corn, soybeans, discarded vegetable oil or animal fat. We hear a lot about biofuels and fossil fuels in the news, but sometimes the two terms can get tangled in our minds. Are fossil fuels really made from fossils? Can a regular car fill up on biofuels? Are there any clean-burning fossil fuels, like natural gas?.

Pollutants are Sulfur dioxide, Nitrogen oxide, Pm10 particles (Big particles in the air, dust ,matter, etc.) And Carbon monoxide

Abstract – The world can’t be imagined without IC Engines ,as their applications are wider in various fields. And mainly used input for this engines are fossil fuels. But the challenge in this is decreasing rate of resources. The fossil fuels may not be available after some years if they used in the same way .Not only the fossil but also the electric power is the non renewable energy, This paper concentrates to run the engine without fossil fuels or electricity.

There are some that say that the US is ready to start replacing fossil fuels with alternative energy resources and some don't exactly agree. Alternative energy sources include biofuels, hydrogen, solar, geothermal, wind and nuclear energy and fossils fuels are fuels such as oil, coal, and petroleum. Those for alternative energy argue that fossil fuels are inefficient, unsustainable, environmentally destructive, and the primary contributor to global climate change. They believe that renewable energies are a viable and immediately needed alternative to fossil fuels. Then those for fossil fuels believe that there are many technical hurdles that have to be overcome before alternative energy could replace even a small portion of the power powered by fossil fuels. They also say that fossil fuels will last hundreds of years longer, be made more efficient, and remain the most economical

2. According to Anderson and Boul (2005), the two largest consumers of oil products are the United States and China. China is one of the major contributors to the growth in oil consumption as well.

Fossil fuels have been the world’s main energy source since they were discovered, however, they carry harmful side effects such as pollution and climate change. Forms of alternative energy such as solar, wind, and nuclear power are possible replacements of fossil fuel energy. Controversy surrounds both fossil fuels and alternative forms of energy due to each energy form having consequences. Some believe that alternative energy brings just as many disadvantages as fossil fuels, while others argue that alternative energy is better for the environment and its population.

What has changed in the last few hundred years is the additional release of carbon dioxide by human activities. Fossil fuels burned to run cars and trucks, heat homes and businesses, and power factories are responsible for about 98% of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions, 24% of methane emissions, and 18% of nitrous oxide emissions. Increased agriculture, deforestation, landfills, industrial production, and mining also contribute a significant share of emissions. In 1997, the United States emitted about one-fifth of total global greenhouse gases.

Earth is the only place in the universe that can support human life. It is very important that we realize this fact and take very good care of it. Various human activities cause the destruction of earth. Human beings can live a few days without food and water however humans can last only a few seconds without oxygen. Various human activities lead to the aggravation of the quality of air. Gases produced by human activities mainly due to exploitation of resources and industrialization cause air pollution. Green house gases mainly chlorofluorocarbons; carbon