Foundational Knowledge, also known as Standard 1 emphasizes that educators “understand the theoretical and evidence-based foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction.” Foundational knowledge is essential for preparing educators for roles in the reading profession. It consists of the major theories, research, and the best practices that share a consensus of acceptance in the reading field. Educators who become a part of the reading profession should understand the historically shared
reflection on our preexisting concepts. The goal of traditional epistemology is to formulate necessary and sufficient conditions for justification. Traditional epistemologists often attempt to analyze justification by proposing criteria and testing said criteria with thought experiments. Successful criteria for justification must include every case that we can intuitively consider to be an instance of knowledge and exclude every scenario in which our intuitions tell us that knowledge is lacking. A famous
obviously specifying the inventive theory of HRD, and challenges individuals who do not see this as very important to the job. The essential argument is that HRD must carry on to grown-up as a discipline and that the combination of selected psychological, economic and systems theories hand out as the outstanding theoretical foundation of HRD.The development of the field of HRD charts an fascinating and exciting course. The pasture of HRD relies on three foundation theories in categorize to identify with
Mishra and Koeler’s TPACK framework by adding Learning Theory (Slota, Young, Choi, & Lai, 2014). Although the TPACK framework proposed the way to understand how to integrate technology in the classroom as a unique body of knowledge, technology integration practice is, more often than not, thought of as a set of pedagogical skills or strategies to simply utilize technology in pursuit of effective instruction. Given the omission of learning theory from the teacher competency framework, it thus may lead
Koeler’s TPACK framework by adding Learning Theory (Slota, Young, Choi, & Lai, 2014). Although the TPACK framework on which it is based proposed the way to understand how to integrate technology in the classroom as a unique body of knowledge, technology integration practice is, more often than not, thought of as a set of pedagogical skills or strategies to simply utilize technology in pursuit of effective instruction. Given the omission of learning theory from the teacher competency framework, it might
may never meet in person. Second, social learning theory and its constructs are already having a significant positive impact on the company's performance. By concentrating on best practices of social learning theory, Joe could gain even greater levels of performance within the company. The concept of self-efficacy is highly relevant to the recruiting and retention of sales people and the management of their expectations of themselves. The concept of self-efficacy as it relates to the recruitment
motivational design concept will be discussed as well as John Keller’s A.R.C.S. (ARCS) Model of Motivational Design and Raymond J. Wlodkowski’s Motivational Framework for Culturally Responsive Teaching. The similarities between both theories in addition to the differences will also be discussed. What is a motivational design concept? It is the process of orchestrating procedures and/or resources that causes a change in ones enthusiasm, drive and/or motivation. These motivational design concepts can be used
Context: What is the business problem? What is the specialization? Are these appropriately related? From my review of the first article I found that the business problem is whether or not employees’ beliefs regarding employment training and the benefits of the training has any type of impact on the employees’ commitment to the organization. The specialization as I understand it would be the petroleum industry, as for the study is focused on the petroleum industry. According to Al-Emadi, & Marquardt
1. What is the traditional understanding of knowledge? Explain two theories of truth. What is the difference between foundationalism and coherentism? What is knowledge? What does knowledge mean and how does a person get to know something? And taking the step further than that how does a person know that the something is true? What is the basis for knowledge? There are two main forms of knowledge; a priori and empirical. A priori is knowledge that is independent from a person 's experience and can
sustainment of human lives. MCD is a challenging concept with numerous steps to produce the desired ending result. At the forefront, are lane schematics and problematic areas that will hinder MCD. The targeted audience in my original lesson plan was the small group leaders: Platoon Sergeants, who have vital roles in managing a successful MCD site. All portrayed in the video had limited knowledge of the MCD concept; however, they had the foundational skills to understand what MCD is and its importance