Four Loves Argument Essay

The love of affection is a term that I feel I have had in my life and was easily portrayed as a need. My parents are the people in who brought me into this world. They have shown me their ways of becoming a person- by me making my own decisions, and most importantly having a walk with Christ. They may have been a pain to me through discipline, but they always have shown me their love through affection.

It is often—in books, poems, paintings, and sculptures—that one hears of and sees the goddess of love. But when is it that one hears of the god? In Greek mythology, Eros is the god of love, and a god who is many times overlooked. In Robert Bridges’ “EPÙÓ” and Anne Stevenson’s “Eros”, the idea that Eros is overlooked is portrayed, but in two separate ways. Techniques such as diction, imagery, and tone are used to help convey the idea.

The opinion and image that most people have of Eros, the god of love in Greek mythology, often reflect the view and representation that people have for love itself. Since love is such a puzzling matter, people quickly form an ambivalent opinion toward Eros. Robert Bridges and Anne Stevenson reveal these uncertain feelings toward Eros in their poems directed to the Greek god of love through their diction, allowing readers to notice similarities and differences in their works. Although Bridges and Stevenson expose a level of uncertainty and sympathy toward Eros in their poems, both poets different inquisitive interpretations of Eros divulge their true and differing feelings toward

deal with concepts of homosexual love. Sappho, the only ancient Greek female author whose work survived, talks from the female point of observation, whereas Plato’s work concentrates on the idea of love among males. Though both of their perspectives are similar in ways such as their ideas of physical attraction and desire, Plato’s work creates a better understanding of the nature of love then Sappho’s ideas. This understanding will be shown with three arguments and counter- arguments in order to demonstrate the dominance of Plato over Sappho. It will than be concluded with an overview of the main idea and a recap of the three arguments made for Plato.

In the excerpt of “Four Loves”, C.S. Lewis explains his view on friendship and how it is formed. C.S. Lewis displays the contrasts of friendship from companionship and romance by consistently asking the question “Do you see the same truth”. By asking this question Lewis explains how friendship is established.

As with the aspects of physical love and lust within humans, the ideas of reproduction permeate throughout The Symposium. In Aristophanes' address, he discusses the history of love in the

Robert Bridges and Anne Stevenson have two poems that emphasize the conflicting nature of love. Both of the poems introduce two different concepts of love, the first being how love is eternal, and the second being the lost perspective of what love really is. With their description of Eros, their rhyme schemes, and tones, we see their contradictory conclusions about the definition of love.

In both Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice and William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing, a power inequality exists between eros and philia. While the quest to obtain eros drives the plotlines of both Pride and Prejudice and Much Ado About Nothing, ultimately it is the power of philia that allows the characters to obtain romantic love. In this paper, I will compare the power of eros and philia in Pride and Prejudice and Much Ado About Nothing, and demonstrate that philia is the most powerful love. Philia is not only powerful because it has the ability to influence the creation or destruction of eros, but also because the characters in the texts place a greater value upon this love.

A prominent playwright known for his romantic productions is William Shakespeare. It is evident that the topic of love is brought up many times in Romeo and Juliet. In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, love is presented as an aggressive force that overpowers all other values and desires. This can be compared to the idea that love is very powerful in Diane Ackerman’s “Love’s Vocabulary”, and contrasted to the idea that love is gentle in I Corinthians 13:4-8. Shakespeare’s idea of love is similar to

The main topic of Plato’s Symposium is the question “what is love”. It is a record of six speeches by different academics that all tell a story and use verse to express a lot of varying stories and themes about the nature and function of love (eros). In the Theaetetus, Socrates explores three definitions of what knowledge is and each of these

Eros love in Othello is the mature love between Othello and Desdemona. Through calm or rough times, this form of love shows up again and again. Shakespeare’s use of figurative language and literary devices greatly shows Eros throughout the play Othello between Othello and Desdemona.

As singer Alexander Nestor Haddaway once sang, “What is love?” It is an enduring question, and one that many artists have attempted to answer throughout the centuries. Today however, the focus is on one artist (Virgil), one book (The Aeneid), and one character (Aeneas). According to Aeneas, there are two fundamental kinds of love, passionate love and pious love. With the use of fire imagery, Virgil makes references to these two forms of love. However, he makes it clear that they are very different and are not to be confused with one another. A conflict occurs between these two different forms of love which causes each to highlight the other.

As lysander and hermia face the challenge of Eeg Us’ rejection of their love because his consent for marriage with hermia was given to demetrius, lysander explains to hermi that love is not a simple thing, but rather “the course of true love never did run smooth.” Love is complicated and difficult, but also so rewarding. Just as Shakespeare states, love is not something that is easily faced, but we take it one day at a time. Often, obstacles, arguments, or errors can create distance between people, even if their love for one another is strong and true, and these factor test the love of one person for another. Although pain and miscommunication are difficult, they allow for growth. Without those flaws and imperfections, there would be true love,

We only call a certain category of those in love, lovers (Symposium 7) and in contrast with what Aristophanes had said about lovers being in search of their other half, Diotima argues that lovers love what is good. After all, the aim of loving beautiful and good things, of course, is to possess them, because the possession of beautiful and good things is wisdom and with wisdom comes happiness and happiness is deep-down what everyone is ultimately in pursuit of.

The term “Eros,” referring to passionate love in English, has long been the mainstream of themes in drama, literature, arts, and cinematic media. The fascinating power of love has been exhaustively publicized, and the pursuit of love is diffused in streets and lanes. Conversely, in ancient times, many poets, especially Virgil, Ovid and Apuleius, described eros as such an evil spirit that it will destroy the female soul thoroughly, except for the one in Apuleius’ story of Cupid and Psyche. Even if taking into account the historical background of a patriarchal community and therefore the esteemed male dominance, the particular case of Psyche’s surviving and even thriving her encounter with eros