Framers Of The United States Constitution

There were many major problems with the Articles of Confederation that ultimately caused it to fail. For example, laws needed 9 out of 13 states’ approval in order

The Articles of Confederations was built so that states were able to see after their own problems and create their own laws. The Articles of Confederation failed because it put power in the hands of the states instead of the national government. After the Revolutionary War, people became cautious of another national government so they more or less decided to have states govern themselves. Since the states didn’t want a national government, the lack of having a strong leadership caused havoc among them. Additionally, the framework for the Article of Confederations was flawed from the start. For example, trade became unregulated, it created economic difficulties among states which made states became financially distraught, it provided for no

The Articles of Confederation did not allow the national government to force their laws on states. They could coin and borrow money but did not have the power to tax. In that time, Congress lacked the strength and leadership to lead the nation. No form of a national military existed. The Supreme Courts did not exist at the national level. Each state had their own economic revenue. Last but not least, each state can issue their own tariffs on goods coming from another state. Soon after, the idea of the articles began failing America and the Second Continental Congress occurred. Officials gathered together and made the Constitution. After countless reforms added to the Constitution, people were still not happy because it did not represent the

In order to understand the motivation of the Framers of the U.S. Constitution one must review the event leading up to it. When the war with Great Britain finally came to a close, the Colonialist of America became weary of what was to come. Many who were well versed in Tomas Hobbes and John Locke feared, without proper action and if not too long delayed, the that states would find themselves in a State of Nature.

Another huge problem with the Articles of Confederation is that they didn’t invent a federal currency. Continental money wasn’t profitable much, and some states started to coin their own currency, which made this worse, which made making trade among the states almost not happen able. The Articles also did not work to create Congress to let

The articles of confederation, which was the founding fathers original idea, had a lot of good ideas but no really good way to go through with it. One of the many problems was that the individual states had too much power for themselves and the states as a whole did not function properly together and could not make a decision in case an emergency had occurred. Another issue was that the states printed their own money

The Framers of the Constitution in 1787 believed the people weren’t intelligent enough to choose their own leader. They were concerned how informed their voters would be and decided that the president should be elected indirectly. Thus, the Electoral College was produced. The Electoral College, fundamentally, prohibits civilians from voting directly for the president. How does this work? First, the country holds the popular vote. Every adequate voter in every state gets one vote for the president. Then, it is passed to the electoral vote. Now, each state obtains at least three votes depending on the population of that state. In order to be declared president, the candidate must receive a majority of the votes. If no one acquires a majority of the votes, then the House of Representatives elects the president from the top three contenders. In which case, each state gets one vote. Therefore, is it time to get rid of the Electoral College? The answer is no; the process may not be equal, but it protects the country’s ideologies. The Electoral College should be kept because it keeps extremists in check, protects the federalist system, and settles the presidency.

The Articles of Confederation had several advantages. For example it avoided tyranny and it gave state governments more power. On the other hand, it had more disadvantages than the advantages. The government had no power to set up a national army, to collect taxes directly from each state, or to offer and

One of the main problems within the Articles of Confederation was the fact that it purposefully established a weak central government. This was done for the sole reasoning that it was a belief among the common people that a strong national government would abuse

There were many weaknesses under the articles of confederation. For starters, each state had a single vote in Congress. This was argued to be unfair, because it didn't take into account the size of the state. It seamed that a larger state should have more votes because of a larger population. Second, congress did not hold certain powers necessary to operate appropriately. For example, each state could make their own money, but that money might not have been accepted or used in other states. In addition to the issues with this new created currency, the war left states in significant debt. This was problematic because the Articles didn't allow its congress to collect tax money. States were only allowed to borrow money from other states. Lastly,

The Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses imposed upon it as well. There were no executive branches to enforce acts passed by Congress, no national court system in place, each state was only allowed one vote in Congress, and Congress did not have the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce, plus it required that all amendments to the Articles of Confederation be voted on unanimously in order to

Firstly, The framers wrote the Constitution with the original intent that the philosophy of interpreting it would be strict. They wanted to clearly state exactly how the government will be set up and how the powers of it will be evenly distributed. If the framers were going to make a document that completes so many great objectives and perfects the flaws of the Articles of Confederation, why would they want the people who read the Constitution to interpret it loosely? Such a philosophy would defeat the purpose of writing a Constitution all together. The framers wanted the people who read and interpret the Constitution to understand that everything said in the document is exact and that there are no implied powers within it.

The framers of the United States of America constitution were all a group of visionaries. They come together and drafted the constitution to address the issues as well as avoiding some dangers in which they foresaw where not only to face the American people then, but even in the years to come. The American constitution was drafted to address key issues such as the freedom of speech, governing and abiding laws, freedom of religion and equal protection by the law. To achieve all this, the framers of the United States of America constitution went ahead and drafted government powers in the three main branches of government; the president, Judiciary and executive.

The constitution was put into place in 1789. The constitution provided a strong central government along with the federal system. The federal system divided the governments power into federal and state powers. However the framers knew that there would be conflicts between the federal and state governments. To do solve this problem, the framers of the constitution implemented the supremacy clause.

They did not trust strong governments, so the central government very little power (Murphy). There was no court system given to the national government so the states were in charge of it all, which meant complaints could not be filed against them (Brackemyre). One of the only powers the national government had was to declare war but they were not allowed to raise an army to fight it and it lacked a chief executive to conduct foreign affairs. The United States also had an ineffective legislative under the Articles of Confederation. Amendments that they wanted to be passed needed to be vote on unanimously and there had to be a nine out of thirteen vote to pass a law (Kelly). Each state also had only one despite their population. Under the Articles, the government did not have a stable economic system, lacked key central leadership and had an inefficient legislature.