Freda Opperman Facts

The author uses 3rd person omniscient point of view in addition to 1st person point of view. The point of views shift between a narrator and five characters throughout the entire short story in order to help the readers understand the family dynamics during a stay at a lake house in Canada. The narrator is used to provide an unbiased description of the characters and events taking place, while each character also offers their own narrative and views. Without the multiple point of views offered, the reader may only understand that Portia’s frustration with George led her to killing herself, discounting the clear issues that Prue and Pamela had exposed the family to as well.

would eventually allow us to find out who the characters truly are, and what they believe in. Memories also play a key role in the message of identity, since we can understand why specific characters did some things. Memories can influence them, or remind them of people who were once with them. They may be physically gone, but they’re still in memories, and can still influence decisions, as seen in “War of the Wall.” In the end, no matter what you’re reading, there are characters who do things that may confuse you, but imagery and memories within the text can eventually lead you onto the right path of understanding the reasoning behind

Background / Back-Story Places and events alluded to (you may wish to look up the

The novel used third person narrative. In fact, the voice is gentle and calm most of the time; it is descriptive and convincing through the story.

1. I believe the narrator of the story is using third person omnicient. Third person omniecient is when the narator of a story is "all knowing". The narrator knows the thoughts and feelings of all the charachters in the story.

 Instead of putting her hand out to shake it, she instead fumbled her hand in her pocket. She, after giving a talk on forgiveness, could not forgive this man. How could she? He had been a nazi, he was responsible for his sisters death. She doubted he even remembered her, but she knew him. "You mentioned Ravensbruck in your talk, I was a guard there.", he did not remember her, how could he out of those thousands of women?

When agreeing to the reading “The forgotten victim from Florence and Normandie” an article from the LA Times, by Steve Lopez, about Fidel Lopez story, it had me anxious, a man who was “dragged from his truck” (Lopez, pg. 2) and was brutally beaten in the Los Angeles riots in 1992. Many like author Steve Lopez never heard back from Fidel after the riot or have ever heard his story about him surveying the LA riots, some assumed Fidel never made it out alive, someone who had helped author Steve Lopez fundraise money for the Lopez’s family told Steve “she thought Lopez might have died” (Lopez, pg. 2) stated in the article. Even after his brutally attack was being broadcast on national television all over the Los Angeles area, in which Fidel wife, Coralia, witness her husband being beaten nearly to death not knowing it was her husband, Coralia stated in the article “I didn't know is was Fidel. I could’t tell is was him.” (Steve, pg. 3) Listening to her words made things hard to imagine how Coralia must have felt watching her husband on television nearly pass away. The rest was nothing but jaw dropping moments as you continue to read further

they give information about what is happening in the present, but each character also, at

From the start, it is clearly shown that the story is in the first-person point of view. This type of view is not as direct towards the reader when compared to a third-person point of view. The narrator can influence the reader’s opinion and confused them with her plight. She is the only primary source the reader is in contact with, and that is due to the narrator writing her thoughts in a diary. Throughout her writing, she describes her experience and opinions that she may have. This could promote sympathy

The story becomes more clear to me after Miss.Cheng elucidated to me the main idea.

Whereas protected, emphatically, not included; progressively, a perfect storm, chaos is common and conflict the norm. Subsequently, a willing participant in a botched attempt at kidnapping Sibela, a retake of his life, an ex-lover reappears as suddenly as she disappeared. Now his captive, the news Deidra shares—he’s being set up for the murders, joins his list of predicaments. Furthermore, having resided with the enemy for two years, she offers a solution—shadowing it, a second

These are how the stories are related, and how choice and consequence go together with the story.

Insurgent is written from the first person point of view, throughout the eyes of the main character, Beatrice “Protagonist” Prior, as well as Four Eaton. The use of first person in the tale works well in that the reader is able to know the current world in which this humanity operates. The viewpoints are shifted by part title

After analysing the level of uncertainty which arises, both in the narrative and the reader’s experience, ‘stream of consciousness’ adds to the narrative a more immediate and a more powerful shift of viewpoints. When Joana stops the narrator’s narrative of her own life story through the exclamatory sentence ‘No, no, I want no god, I want to be alone.’ (193), Joana imposes her will through her intervention in the narrative; Joana turns, as a result, the narrative more personal. Also, the subject pronoun ‘I’ preserves the existent intimacy between character and reader besides the theme of uncertainty discussed earlier. Moreover, the more Joana takes control over the narrative, the more Joana is in control of her life. The reader senses that Joana

Subsequently, the narrator conveys the events through a subjective lens, in an attempt to distance herself from the