preview

Frederick II Compare And Contrast Essay

Good Essays

Emperor Frederick II of Germany and King Louis IX of France were both important figureheads of the crusades as they personally prepared for the departure and led the army to the Holy Land. This indicated a transition of responsibility for crusading from the Church to royal figures. Even though Louis IX’s crusades failed and Frederick II’s crusade gained control of the Holy Land, Louis IX became a saint whereas Frederick II was declared the Antichrist. Therefore, the outcome of the crusades led by both kings did not determine the public’s approval and disapproval. Despite failing both of his crusades, Louis IX became a saint because of his sincere intention and devotion to liberate the Holy Land. Frederick II, on the other hand, was indifferent toward the faith and the main purpose for him to lead the crusade was to acquire …show more content…

Other than various documents praising Louis’ personality, even his enemy praised him for being noble. Since his father took part in the Albigensian Crusade, Louis grew up in a family of past crusaders with chivalry tradition. Therefore, he had a strong sense of justice and religious identity. Louis was passionate about leading his own crusade in order to save Jerusalem and restore the honor of the Church. He used most of France’s resources to fund the crusades during the preparation process. Louis also gained Innocent IV’s trust since the pope gave Louis one tenth of his church’s revenue. Even after losing his first crusade, the king took full responsible for it and committed to his position as a ruler of France for penance. Meanwhile, he still assisted the crusader kingdom in different ways such as sending them funds from France. During his trip to the Holy Land, all people joyfully welcomed him. Louis’s presence had stabilized Jerusalem’s internal conflicts. Furthermore, Louis improved the defenses of the crusader

Get Access