Emperor Frederick II of Germany and King Louis IX of France were both important figureheads of the crusades as they personally prepared for the departure and led the army to the Holy Land. This indicated a transition of responsibility for crusading from the Church to royal figures. Even though Louis IX’s crusades failed and Frederick II’s crusade gained control of the Holy Land, Louis IX became a saint whereas Frederick II was declared the Antichrist. Therefore, the outcome of the crusades led by both kings did not determine the public’s approval and disapproval. Despite failing both of his crusades, Louis IX became a saint because of his sincere intention and devotion to liberate the Holy Land. Frederick II, on the other hand, was indifferent toward the faith and the main purpose for him to lead the crusade was to acquire …show more content…
Other than various documents praising Louis’ personality, even his enemy praised him for being noble. Since his father took part in the Albigensian Crusade, Louis grew up in a family of past crusaders with chivalry tradition. Therefore, he had a strong sense of justice and religious identity. Louis was passionate about leading his own crusade in order to save Jerusalem and restore the honor of the Church. He used most of France’s resources to fund the crusades during the preparation process. Louis also gained Innocent IV’s trust since the pope gave Louis one tenth of his church’s revenue. Even after losing his first crusade, the king took full responsible for it and committed to his position as a ruler of France for penance. Meanwhile, he still assisted the crusader kingdom in different ways such as sending them funds from France. During his trip to the Holy Land, all people joyfully welcomed him. Louis’s presence had stabilized Jerusalem’s internal conflicts. Furthermore, Louis improved the defenses of the crusader
According to Dana C. Munro, the first crusades began under the papacy of Pope Urban II. From whom delivered a speech in 1096 at the Council of Clermont that led thousands to take up the cross. It is from that moment on the Popes always felt the crusades were their task and under their inspiration believing that the crusades were God’s work and they were His agents. Let us consider the words of Pope Urban II according to Fulk of Chartres, “I speak to those who are present, I shall proclaim it to the absent, but it is Christ who commands. Moreover, if those who set to thither lose their lives on the journey, by land or sea, or in fighting against the heathen, their sins shall be remitted in that hour; this I grant through the power of God vested in me. ”
The Papacy in Rome sanctioned the First Crusade and Pope Urban II preached for a great Christian expedition to capture Jerusalem, the Holy Lands from the Muslims. During this time religion permeated every aspect of life. The Christian kings and peasants believed that every human being was judged in death and one way to absolve oneself of sin was to die in the name of the Lord, therefore dying in the Crusades would purify the soul allowing them to go straight to heaven. Consequently, “thousands of laymen and clergy took up the cross and younger sons of the upper-class had military advantages to become Crusaders” (Fiero, 2017). At this particular time, the church acknowledged and vindicated fighting and killing in the name of God, resulting in the Crusaders slaughtering all enemies of Christ; hundreds of men, women, and children plus the “entire Jewish populations of Cologne and Mainz became victims” (Fiero, 2017). The First Crusade set a dangerous precedent, the rise of organized anti-Jewish persecution and each subsequent Crusade resulted in renewed attacks on the Jews. The persecution of Jews reached a climax during the Crusades.
America, a land with shimmering soil where golden dust flew and a days rain of money could last you through eternity. Come, You Will make it in America. That was the common theme of those who would remove to America. It is the common hymn, the classic American rags-to-riches myth, and writers such as Benjamin Franklin and Frederick Douglass had successfully embraced it in their works.Franklin and Douglass are two writers who have quite symmetrical styles and imitative chronology of events in their life narratives.
The age leading up to the first crusade is detailed by many current historians, as well as Pope Urban II, as a time period where inhabitants "rage[d] against [their own] brothers and cut each other [to] pieces" (Peters, Baldric of Dol, 31) for economic and social advancement. In spite of these references, many people today believe that the Pope instigated the crusades for the sole reason of reclaiming Jerusalem. However, other motivations such as supplementary religious factors and the chance for economic, social, and political gain also played major roles. These motivations were not experienced supremely by the Pope; in fact he needed to instill these inspirations in all Christians to evoke their will to fight. The holy land had long
To the early Crusaders, taking back the Holy Land was only the beginning in the line of liberating Spain, southeastern Europe, and other Christian lands that the Muslims began to fight for (Whittemore). In addition to helping fellow Christians, the Pope promised the Crusaders that in return for fighting for their religion they would be forgiven of all their sins and were assured to enter heaven. Before the First Crusade, Pope Urban II traveled across Europe to speak out to the Christian population. This is also one of the first recorded times in European history in which the pope actively traveled outside the Vatican to speak to the average Christian European (Urban II). Seeing Pope Urban II in person speaking on protecting Christianity only inspired more people to join the First Crusade. According to Robert the Monk who recorded many of the
The Crusades were the first tactical mission by Western Christianity in order to recapture the Muslim conquered Holy Lands. Several people have been accredited with the launch of the crusades including Peter the Hermit however it is now understood that this responsibility rested primarily with Pope Urban II . The main goal of the Crusades was the results of an appeal from Alexius II, who had pleaded for Western Volunteers help with the prevention of any further invasions. The Pope’s actions are viewed as him answering the pleas of help of another in need, fulfilling his Christian right. However, from reading the documents it is apparent that Pope Urban had ulterior motives for encouraging engagement in the war against the Turks. The
Yordanose SolomoneAfro 3597 WEssay ATuesday October 18, 2016The Contradicting Nature of Christianity and the Institution of Slavery A Thematic Analysis of Frederick Douglass 's NarrativeChristianity quite often, especially when associated to the system of slavery becomes even more of a contentious issue than it already is. In The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Frederick Douglass presents the theme of perversion of Christianity by slaveholders as a way to bring out the contradiction that lie deep within slaveholders ' adulterated interpretation of the belief system. In this paper, I will highlight these perversions that Douglass discusses in his narrative and explore why slaveholders ' form of Christianity make strong impression in his writing. Lastly, I will examine the larger tonal meaning as it relates to the theme and share some reasoning behind Douglass 's need to include it in his narrative.The first element of perversion of Christianity that Douglass mentions is the dehumanization role "the slaveholders '" Christianity plays in dismantling any form of familial structure the slaves may have created.Douglass speaks about this in this association with his own separation from his mother, Harriet Bailey and not completely knowing who his father is. Thus establishing the first element in this perversion, which can be explained easily as a breaking down the first requirement for a growing boy, a family.This perversion lets slaveholders not only to distort the
Throughout the entire history of the world people constantly struggle with many different things, whether it’s with simple daily life tasks, a job, raising a family, school or social interactions. I am no different and have gone through many struggles in life whether it’s with a death in the family, schoolwork or friends. Each person’s struggles are different from another’s. Similar to Fredrick Douglass in the biography, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass: An American Slave , when it comes to literacy, I have struggled most of my life. Identifying the obstacle, the different levels of help that can be received and one’s own level of commitment to hard work and dedication determines the individual’s success with any struggle. I struggled
Frederick Douglas and I are complimentary in many ways. Believe it or not, I can actually see myself as the young woman version of Frederick Douglas in the 21st centry. We have a bundle of similarites but we also have our distint differences in our education such as how we learned, what we learned, and what we used to learn. For example, one of us may have had more resources but didn't really have a specific pattern or order to do it, but the other even though he didn't have as much, was more organized on how to learn what they wanted to learn. In other words, had an actual plan mapped out instead of just winging it.
The Crusaders faced a multitude of obstacles. They didn’t have a consistent or widely accepted leader, no consensus about the relations with the churchman who went with them, no clear definition of what the pope would do during the crusading and no agreement with the
believed that God made black people became slave and gave a question why God do that? However, he never blamed anything to God. he still believed that God would help him and other slave become freedom one day. He decided to learn more about Bible and always prayed whenever he got time. He became a devotee and believed in Christ. His religious faith led him believe that he was born for specific duty. He was brought to this life to do somethings for God. Those words touch his heart and made him believe that he is useful and he should prepare for to do. He always prayed when he had free time and believe that his life was guided by a higher wisdom and on the great time, God will take him out of his slavery. Unlike Douglass believed that God only brought the good things to everyone, the slave masters believed that God brought slave to them. Although, the masters came to Church every week, but they still treated slave as a monster. Finally, he understood the first thing that he needed to do was learn how to read and write. He realized that education was the only way could help him to be free.
For the Christians during the first Crusade, a strong faith and a commitment to Christianity was crucial in fostering a success victory. First, the call to the Crusade by Pope Urban in 1095 focused on the sinfulness of the Christians and the need for reform, as well as the need to help fellow Christians (Urbans Call). The exceptional faith of the Christians is what motivated them to take up the arms for the Crusade, as depicted most specifically by the people’s Crusade led by Peter the Hermit (Albert of Aachen). While the people did gain a full remission of sins and some reward for their Crusading, they were so faithful that God would bring victory and to the leadership of Peter that they marched straight down to Jerusalem with very little thought of a possibility of defeat (Albert of Aachen). This force met an unprepared Muslim force, mostly because the Muslim forces were under dispersed
The lifestyles of Richard Wright and Frederick Douglass are relatively distinct in their own way which makes it clear to say who lived a terrible life. However, the former EOF student, Raiyah Johnson, concluded that the essays written by them provided evidence that Douglass had it far worse than Wright. Her supposition was entirely fair to differentiate their life experiences when they each lived their life differently. The time periods that the text was written shaped what types of experiences they lived through. Douglass was not able to do many things as a slave seeing as it was all if not mostly forbidden of him to do the things Wright could do. On the other hand, although it was forbidden, Douglass could write, and it was his pursuit of knowledge that pushed him into a downward spiral of depression and misery. If Wright had deliberate intentions to pursue writing his emotional well being could
• Pope Urban ll initiated the First Crusade in November 1095 with an influential speech calling upon people to fight and recover the Holy Land at The Council of Clermont, France
By this time most of the crusaders had left to go home, and those who remained ad built four settlements. The purpose of these four settlements were to guard and govern conquered territory. These Crusader states were Jerusalem, Edessa, Antioch and Tripoli. However, the Muslim forces began gaining ground around 1130, and in 1144 Zangi who was the Seljuk general captured Edessa (northern Crusader states. By this time Pope Eugene III called for a second crusade, his call was answered by King Louis VIII and his wife Eleanor. Louis was a very religious man and he wanted to honor the first crusaders and his goal was to take the cross and expand the Crusader kingdoms. Unfortunately, Louis had very little military experience, but he still set out with more than 30,000 crusaders to recapture the holy land. This journey took five months because they traveled through France to Asia Minor. This wasn’t a good strategy because by doing this they would pass through Turkish lands and therefore put themselves in danger. The Turks took advantage of this situation by attacking Louis’s group (there were two groups traveling). Louis and his wife were able to survive but there were thousands of crusaders that were killed. Louis decided that best approach would be to abandon his army to look for a new route. His original route was Edessa but he took the way of Damascus (Palestine) because it was closer to Jerusalem. Nur Al-Din who was the son of Zangi (Turkish General), went to unite all of the Muslims in preparation for the war. Even though Nur Al-Din was determined to take back Jerusalem it was Louis who made the first move in 1148. Nur Al-Din had a choice to take Damascus and if he did so he would have more power, (Aleppo and Damascus were the eastern part of the Crusader states. The results of the battle was that there were thousands of Muslims that were dead, the Damascus ruler begged Nur Al-Din to send his army. Louis had to make a