Free Healthcare Should Not Be Increased

Should the United States government provide free health care services to everyone in the U.S.? millions of Americans those residing in the U.S. have lost their health insurance. In Canada and mother other countries health insurance is already guaranteed. Experts have argued that universal free healthcare can be very successful. On the contrary. Other professionals have argued that universal free healthcare would be detrimental for the economy, such as being expensive and/or lack of quality.

In conclusion, not everyone is going to agree with free healthcare. Even though a right to health care could possibly increase the US debt and deficit, and raise taxes, all Americans should have the absolute right to free healthcare. It is a universal right, and it could save lives and improve the overall public health in

Health care is a very well known topic that is talked about in the United States. There are many reasons for free health care, but the main reason is that it is for the people who can not afford it. Health care is a necessary need for every human being, and it should be provided to every human, no matter how much money the individual have.

With free healthcare it can really help the economy in many ways. One reason why is the fact that when people are sick they have to stay home from work. Since they have to stay home, they cannot work which means it slows the company down by not keeping up with productivity. If people had free healthcare they can then go to the doctor and get what they need so they can get back to work quicker. Secondly there are some folks out there that have “Job Lock”. This means they are tied to their job because of a certain reason, and this reason is health care. Some companies offer free healthcare and because it is so expensive having to pay for it yourself people do not want to leave in fear of their health. These pair of facts display that free healthcare helps with people 's jobs and businesses. In addition with the fact that people have to pay ridiculous prices for their medical needs people just have to pay them. Having to pay that could put people in debt if they do not have the amount of money necessary. Following this facts having debt hurts us in many ways. With so much debt around America there is no surprise that an average american is around $50,000 in debt according to “Debt.org”. Showing these tells that out

In recent years, health care has been a huge topic in public debates, legislations, and even in deciding who will become the next president. There have been many acts, legislations, and debates on what the country has to do in regards to health care. According to University of Phoenix Read Me First HCS/235 (n.d.), “How health care is financed influences access to health care, how health care is delivered, the quality of health care provided, and its cost”.

The guys who made our constitution did a pretty good job. Though the times have changed over the past hundreds of years since then, several of their points still hold our country together and have allowed the US to be one of the strongest nations in the world. The Declaration of Independence states that all men have the undeniable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. As life, liberty, and happiness are indeed so important, I stand to reason that health, which dictates the quality of our life and determines our ability to enjoy liberty and pursue happiness, is equally crucial to our welfare. Since 1776, however, the lines that determine how our government is to provide us with life have become blurry thus presenting the

Regardless of what some people are made to believe, health care is a privilege that you work for. Everyone as a United States citizen has the right to pursue quality health care, and this does not mean it should be given. As Peikoff says in his book, Health Care is Not a Right, “The system guarantees you the chance to work for what you want—not to be given it without effort by somebody else” (1). The government should not feed, clothe and provide health care, so the just right person can spend money on some new technology. Witnessing first-hand, working at a pharmacy, as a capable customer receives medication for free with the state plan while talking on their smart phone. This is a good example of someone taking advantage of free services. If a capable person can spend money on a smart phone and the monthly fees they are capable of paying for health insurance. The Medicaid and Medicare systems are designed for the disabled, the unfortunate and the elder; the capable citizens have the right either to obtain health care through health insurance or to pay for health care out right. Living in a free country does not mean receiving free annuities.

It would be great if the Govt. could provide complete Universal Health Insurance to all citizens, plus allow the free market to enable those of us who work for a living to earn/pay for the best doctors and service available. So the question, is should the Government provide free Universal Health Insurance to all Americans. The answer to this question is “Yes” the government should provide free Universal Health Insurance because:

Another benefit associated with free health care system is that it preserves life as it ensures free treatment to the entire citizens despite their financial status. Apparently, the life of a human being is sacred and incomparable with any amount of money. It is unethical for an individual to die due to lack of finance. As stated by Obama, the United States is known to have the most skilled doctors and healthcare facilities in the world (526). Ironically, the two third of the Americans have no access to health insurance cover, meaning, they cannot afford to get the health services from the best doctors and the best facilities in the country. To protect life and to avoid unnecessary deaths of the innocent citizens, free access to medical services should be a distinct system to be employed in the United States of America.

by federal government would exceed the total tax income, which means government could no longer pay for its share in 2032, if not sooner. Admittedly, government can try to enrich treasury funding to fill the gap; nevertheless, unpredictable events can easily consume that extra money, such as Middle East Wars (which cost $1-3 trillion) and 2002 Tax cuts (which reduced the income by $1-2 trillion/10 years) in the past, not to mention the most recent tax cut

Health Care, like all other services comes at a financial cost. While we should strive to make health care available and affordable to all, the bottom line is that it is a service that can only be provided if the voting populous agrees on its need. Basic human rights do not cost money. We have the right to life and liberty which is great and we do not have to pay for it. We have the right to basic medical care as well. But we can only have that if other people

would work in America because it could benefit or harm the public. Should America adopt the free healthcare system, all other forms of health benefits will cease to continue. According to Fox, all Americans will be granted the same health plan, “Health insurance plans would be required to cover each person with a voucher as well as persons assigned to these plans because they did not select a plan.” The cost of free health care goes beyond higher taxes. The new system will eliminate cheaper plans that are dedicated to less fortunate Americans. Without the other health plans the public will pay more to receive less.

If the public had health care it is only logical that people would generally be more healthy. In the United States, citizens are 33% less likely to have a regular doctor, 50% more likely to not obtain needed medicines, and 25% more likely to have unmet health needs than citizens in countries with universal health care. While this is a good reason to acquire universal health care as a country, less optimistic people see it as another way for the government to ration medical services where they see fit. People might be able to afford health care, but with controlled distribution and budgeting, one might not get the needed health care anyways.

The Government should provide free healthcare for all citizens. Free healthcare is a basic right that all human beings deserve, especially in a first world country. Day Lacks had many health issues including nosebleeds that wouldn’t stop and gangrene in his feet. (Skloot 163) For citizens that are poor that cannot afford healthcare, those people cannot get the treatment they need to live a normal life. My second claim is that Henrietta got life extending treatment for her cancer for free. Hopkins was one of the top hospitals in the country, it was built in 1889 as a charity hospital for the sick and poor. (Skloot 15) This means that Henrietta was too poor to go to a normal hospital and receive proper treatment. The treatments received helped

Free public health care or a single payer system as it’s referred to, is a health care system in which the state/government pays for any and all health care costs for its citizens. However in the south pacific region this system is becoming increasingly unsustainable, citizens are now being required to meet the full or partial costs of their treatment. This new system is referred to as the user pays system where the government is not responsible for meeting the costs of its citizen’s healthcare. This new system has been met with both positive and negative reactions. It is the responsibility of the government to provide free health care to all its citizens who benefit in a social and economical way. However a lot of people have taken to abusing these benefits in the very same sectors. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of free public health care.