Free Market

The free marketplace represents a superlative model of capitalism, since it denotes the most proficient and profitable way of production. In a free market, economic actors are capable of conducting business devoid of political interferences, such as the burden of a minimum wage, or trade in tariffs. Without these limits, economic actors are abridged to a state of clean competition, driving costs downstairs and resulting in senior quality and lower price products.

Free enterprise allows for individuals to have large economic freedoms with some regulations from the government. Many entrepreneur have taken advantage of the system and gained immense wealth. A great example is Bill Gate who has made a huge contribution to the technological industry. His investments in companies like microsoft has helped make it one of the biggest companies in the world. Without a lot of restrictions from the government Bill Gates's fortune grew and without free enterprise his companies wouldn't be as huge as they are now.

            Usually, the first disadvantage that people who oppose free enterprise bring up is the significant social division, or gap between the rich and poor. Although this may be true, it is an inevitable misfortune that will be found in all forms of markets - unless, of course, you live in a utopia. The sad truth is, there will always be a gap between the wealthy and less fortunate, even in

One of the first economic concepts is “Freedom of Enterprise and Choice”. Which is stating that Americans can choose how they want to use their own resources to create products and sell their products. It also states that workers are free to have a job they are qualified for, as well as buyers having the right the purchase any product of their choice. Today, this right is still protected under the US Constitution excluding any laws that deter businesses from doing any harm to the public with the use of their products.

A free market is a type of market that the government is not involved in. Since the government does not care about what happens, the free market is also called “hands-off” or “let it be economics”. The government is limited to protect the citizens from the danger and that is the major goal for the government. In the free market economy, there are three components of the free market economy: competition, active but limited government, and the self-interest. Competition is one of the main components of the free market economy. Competition means that the companies compete with one another to make more benefits to themselves. According to the concept of the free market economy, the competition means a good thing because it is a basic

Cavanaugh’s book is made up of four chapters that focus on negative and positive topics namely: Freedom and Unfreedom, Detachment and Attachment, The Global and the Local, Scarcity and Abundance. The writer begins the book by asking the question “When is a market free?” The market can only be free if the transaction is fair and both parties equally benefit from the purchase or trade. It is also then said that state authority is required to keep the middle man from interfering, because “freedom in itself is pursuing whatever you want without interference from others”.(Kindle Location 104 of

Businesses can decide which goods to produce and in what quantity and consumers can decide what they want to purchase and at what price. The role of the state is limited to ensure right precision in the prices charged by the sellers. Prices also have the function to allocate and distribute a country’s resources. Market leads to complete effectiveness bringing about the best possible distribution of a country’s resources in a perfect world. This would only happen in a state of equilibrium and there is a unique price for every commodity. But in a realistic world which is imperfect by nature, prices are never at equilibrium and very unstable depending upon the vagaries of the market forces. This generally harms people living below the poverty line. It is impossible for them to pay high prices in cases of demand shortage. Thus, the free market model is not a viable option in developing countries which has a large number of poor. Besides, producers are aim to minimize profit and maximize rent of production. Examples of countries that are using this economy system are Hong Kong, USA, and UK. Many developing countries like India and China are moving towards totally free-market economy.

Free market policies would also amputates any needless regulations such as quotas, tariffs, or unnecessary boundaries on corporations. In turn, production costs of goods and services are now reduced since money that would have gone to satisfying these regulations can now be supplied into the business. Now firms are able to afford to provide more of the same product at a lower cost for consumers, with extra revenue to improve production or even wages of the workers. These workers will then, in turn, have a larger amount of money to utilize to buy products now offered at a lower rate improving not one, but multiple businesses.

I agree that the free market would run into serious problems undercutting its sustainability without regulation; however, the free market is as much a creation of the state that is highly influenced by interest groups. Interest groups play an important role in the formation of a regulation. Interest groups help candidates get elected into government. In return, interest groups can lobby for leniencies in policies that serve their interests. For example, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers has lobbied the government of pipeline regulation, streaming of Fisheries Act, tax credits, and greenhouse gas regulations (as per Macleans.ca, The 10 lobby groups with most contact). If these private interests didn’t exist, would the general public lobby to increase tax credits to corporations? I don’t believe this is the case.

Under the democratic system lies a form of government known as an autocracy. An autocracy is different than a democracy in who runs the government. As in, who is making the decisions. In a democracy, the people get to cast a vote and be a part of making the decision or elect those who will be making the decisions. In an autocracy one person is making the decision. That be a king or a dictator, it is their way or the highway. Cuba among other nations in the world still operate with an autocracy form of government. Under the Free-Market system of government lies another form that we are all familiar with. For most of us our familiarity comes from the news and text books. This is the communist form of government, like North Korea uses. This differs

Reich states that the market is dependent on “The five Building Blocks of Capitalism”: Property, Monopoly, Contract, Bankruptcy, and Enforcement. The government is in existence to control the free market and to ensure that each of these building blocks is clearly defined. They also are in charge of enforcing punishment in the situation that someone takes advantage of the market. This indicates that the problem is not

The free-market embodies the ideals set forth by Adam Smith. The free market is different from other markets in that it allows its participants to purse their own interests rather than requiring the dictation of a government or ruler. This pursuit of self-interest causes a

The fact that free markets are based on a contractual agreement between the buyer and seller with very little government control makes it feasible to consider it to be compatible with individual freedom. (Free Market: 2014) Classical liberals may agree with the objectives of free markets, as they emphasise the importance of individual freedom with limited control of the state. (Hagopian)The counter argument is that when the free market economy is fuelled by profit motives, it sacrifices some ethical and economic issues which can cause severe consequences. (Gerald Hanks: 2014) Modern Liberals argue that although individual freedom is important, coercion can be used as a positive outlook of bettering individuals to the best of their ability.

In an economy there are two sectors, the public and private. The private sector, by definition, is the part of a nation's economy that isn't controlled by the government.(Investorwords). Several business organizations make up the private sector with the three basic ones being sole proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations. Most are for profit and part of that profit goes to the government in the form of taxes. The private sector can be referred to as a market. Markets operate by themselves and allocate resources efficiently, but they're not perfect. Government regulation of the private sector is justified under two circumstances: when flaws

Chapter 3 discusses the morality of the market system as a whole. The chapter examines several key components. The chapter discusses how market systems are justified, and explains the strengths and weaknesses of the various systems currently in use. Two concepts are discussed one says that the business system should be planned; the other that it should be a free market system. Further the chapter discusses the various arguments for and against free markets and government regulation as well as the possibility of a hybrid mixed economy system. Introduction to Business Systems begins by discussing Globalization has connected nations together to move goods, services, capital and knowledge freely “Free Markets/Free Trade”. All goods and services have to have a system that society uses to provide the goods and services. To accomplish the objective of moving goods there must the three devices of types of societies. Tradition based societies are when communal based. Command Economies are based on government decisions and finally market economies are where private companies make all decisions. Major arguments took place on whether economics systems should be based on commands or on markets and what roles government should play in deciding what are best. Free Markets became a big issue which basically says that individuals have the right