Free societies all around the world are hanging from a thin thread, Law and order. A society, let alone a free one, can simply not function unless there is a set foundation for it to run on. When the people of such societies rise up and speak out, it tends to cause civil disorder and rioting for example Rosa Parks and the Civil rights movement. The cause in which they were fighting for was a one that was worth fighting but it came at the price of hundreds of African Americans getting beating by Police and Brutal anti-Black sentiment from the White majority. Free societies function on law and order however is it worth speaking up and jeopardizing it or better to just keep quiet and let the society run its course. Mohammed Ali was one of the greatest fighters to …show more content…
federal government. In 2013 Snowdin had released to the public thousands of classified NSA document revealing one of the most controversial undertaken by the intelligence, carrying out espionage on American soil. Snowdin's actions were peaceful put however this could have created a deep resentment toward the federal government and caused riots due to the fact that our own government was committing espionage against us. At the time Snowdin may have thought that what he was doing was good but the consequences that followed would be much more meaningful then the direct effect A free society is all but a facade that has spoon fed to us since birth. We are led to believe that we the people are the ones who make the decisions for this country but instead they are made by political elites in the nation’s capital. Peaceful resistance is what these people carry out through their actions but the consequences that follow are always more substantial than the ones that immediately reveal themselves. Yes, peaceful resistance negatively impacts a free society in that it threatens the very fabric that holds such society together Law and
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Looking back at examples from history, without Rosa Parks, the Woman’s Suffrage Movement, or Martin Luther King Jr., the society we live in would be extremely different. Civil disobedience continues to contributes a huge positive impact on the world we live in today.
Peaceful resistance in the United States of America, done with the right intentions, has a positive impact of a free society. I hold this belief because as humans we can be flawed in our ways of thinking and require something to draw our attention for us to realize our flawed views. Peaceful resistance is positive because it draws attention to an issue in society, it communicates a level of civility, and it attempts to initiate a positive way of addressing issues in society.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. As a society there is nothing stronger than "We the people". Our silence and words speak louder than any actions of ours ever could. Rosa Parks did not scream or fight back against the policemen or the people who tried to make her go sit in the back of the bus. She just sat there quietly which scared people.
Resisting to laws allows citizens to freely express themselves and in doing so, informs the government that changes need to be made to adapt to the ever-changing society. Conclusively, if peaceful resistance to laws were seen as a negative impact on free society, the momentous changes that have been made to the Constitution of the United States to adjust to society would not have been made and the society itself could not truly be considered
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts our free society. It allows us to make our voices heard and spread a message if there is a law that we find is either unfair or goes against our protected freedoms. Peaceful resistance has helped our country grow on multiple occasions. It has always been a part of our countries history and is well protected by our First Amendment rights. Due to this, There is little to know doubt that peaceful resistance has positively effected the lives of many Americans.
Each act of disobedience directs attention towards a specific idea, and prompts the society to talk about it. It also gives licesnse for the liberated members of that society to form their own opinions about the idea. Since the protest harms no one, save the individual who is willing to face the consequences of breaking the law in question. It does not infringe on any other individual's rights. Peaceful resistance to laws has a positive impact on a free society since it educates that society's members and may lead to more liberty for them, which would create a freer
I believe that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Peaceful resistance has been used by activists for hundreds of years, examples being Mahatma Gandhi and even the founders of the United States. Peaceful resistance has consistently been used as a way for people to convey to their government their views and their feelings in a nonviolent and amicable way. It has been used as a tool for people such as the women of the Suffragette Movement, the people of the Civil Rights Movement, and even for people today to stand up for what they believe in and to make their voices heard.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it arouses concern and opens the eyes of law makers and others who are obliged to follow them.
Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? In your answer, incorporate the principles and specific examples (including current events) that support your conclusion.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society, because all committed acts of civil disobedience, all but in very different cases. Have shown a positive impact amongst the people by proving to everyone and the government that every U.S citizen has the freedom to fight for their rights and freedom and not let anyone disrespect their human morals.
Peaceful resistance does not negatively impact a free society. In having the right of free speech and the right to a peaceful protest, the people can express their opinions to their political leaders. These political leaders want to keep their jobs, and will listen to what the people are saying, and will then make changes to policy that make life more free for the people. In the case of pre-Revolutionary fighters like Paul Revere and John Adams, peaceful resistance meant throwing British tea into the Boston Harbor and promoting the halting of consumption of British goods.
We live in a society where change in present. More and more people are expressing their views, even if it is at the cost of their own dignity. Even more recently so, Donald Trump has been elected into office, and there have been both peaceful and not so peaceful protest. But in my own honest opinion, I think peaceful protests are in vein and do not do anything. Therefore, peaceful protests are negative towards a free society.
Peaceful resistance in my mind positive impacts our free society. we are free but we don't need to go around acting as if we are better than the law. if you disobey what the law says then accept the consequences and take blame.the thing to me is that you should never be resisting if you did something and its not allowed or accepted. you need to learn from your mistakes and start doing the right and show people that you are doing the right to make the society a better place for all. A great example of this would the revolutions we felt that we needed something changed so we set out and made it our goal to get it changed even if it took us a fight to get it the way we want and felt was necessary.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Peaceful resistance to allowing voices to be heard. It also allows people to fight for the rights that they believe in. In some cases it is a fight for equality and in other cases liberty. These are just two of the reasons why people participate in peaceful resistance to laws.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence