Free Speech Importance

Centuries ago in American society, individuals were not granted the free will to act and speak freely. First Amendment rights allowed citizens to do so. On a historical outlook, the oppressed fought for the rights of various groups in the United States. Although laws and situations evolve, groups in America continue to face inequality and issues with freedom of speech. There is room for further improvement; freedom for all citizens needs to be fulfilled. The impression of being free is what gives the United States the ideology of being a part of a democracy. Recent events have revealed issues with freedom of speech and questioning about what kinds of speech is protected. In order to close the gap in

I am writing this letter with concern to two of the amendments written on the US constitution.

The freedom to talk, the freedom to dance, the freedom to express one’s feelings are what’s most important. In Amendment One, of the Bill of Rights, the American right and freedom that which deserves celebration is Freedom of Speech -- giving each American citizen an equal opportunity to express his or her opinions about any topic. Our Founding Fathers insured that the new American government would not restrict their ability to express their thoughts or ability to criticize the actions of their government without censorship; because, they truly understood what life was like living under a government, where they had no voice and laws were enacted prohibiting their freedoms. Freedom of Speech however costly led to a more successful America. It allowed people to speak out against injustices. It allowed people to become more diverse by hearing other people’s opinions about different topics. People in America felt pride and value this right because, at the end of the day, they felt as if the government truly cared somewhat about their well-being and state of life. It provided the right for candidates to criticize the current government and

Free speech is a fundamental right to not only being American but being a human. Exchanging and defending principles, beliefs, and ideas have been existent since the beginning of mankind. We would not have made it this far if people did not have the freedom to speak what they wanted or needed to say. Philosophers and scientists, poets and writers, people such as Rousseau, Milton, Locke, Newton, Descartes, and numerous more might never have accomplished what they had or been recognized if not for the freedom of speech. Some of the most important examples of free speech that set in motion the foundation of America were the petitions from the colonists and finally the Declaration of Independence.

In today’s society, many people have a contradictory belief on the issue of freedom of speech. Never wishing it was taken away; but abused by the negative side of this right. People should have the right to speak their minds and not be prosecuted there after. Therefore, there should be no limitations placed upon the First Amendment to the United States Constitution’s legislature on freedom of speech. Gathering three evidential points that pertain to this topic and will be discussed throughout this essay, include: inalienable rights posed in the Bill of Rights, the development of individual personalities, and the advancement of peaceful, social changes.

When you hear someone referring to Freedom of Speech, what comes to your mind? How far should Freedom of Speech go for you or others? And when you see someone practicing Freedom of Speech, do you actually support it? In today’s society, some of us forget what Freedom of Speech actually is and how far it is actually extended.

United States of America has a word named freedom, liberty and rights. All amendments are in the Bill of Rights. Only the first ten amendments were ratified on December 15, 1791. Bill of Rights gives all states for greater constitutional, individual rights. In the Bill of Rights, Amendment 1 is relevant and important to today’s society, because of the freedom of speech and the press, religion and freedom to assemble.

The right to freedom of speech is one of the most important and valuable rights we have as Americans. Freedom of speech is an essential right which doesn’t include hate speech, so the limits of this right have been questioned throughout history and is not secluded to one era of time. From Martin Luther King giving his “I Have A Dream” speech in 1963, to Colin Kaepernick taking a knee in the current NFL Justice for All protest, people want their voices to be heard without interruption, and for justice to be served without being silenced and feeling punished for doing so.

The ability to express oneself is a right that can easily be taken for granted. The right to free speech has become essential to modern society. As we have grown accustomed to this freedom, it has been accepted that all people have the right to free speech, which can take many forms, such as beliefs, thoughts, and actions. However, there are still areas in the world in which citizens are not afforded the same ability that we possess. They are not able to argue what they believe in, knowing they will be silenced for speaking their mind. As a result, it is necessary to argue for free speech on behalf of those without a voice. In this essay, I will argue that there should be a right to free speech given to all humans.

Imagine that a group of students are interested in the same things but the school will not allow them get together and talk about their interests. This makes students and parents furious and they disagree with the school. School clubs should not be monitored because it violates the the First Amendment, it demonstrates valuable skills,and it enables children to develop character.

In the United States of America, U.S citizens are rightfully given inalienable rights, which it cannot be taken away. These inalienable rights grant U.S citizens the right of free speech, freely worship a religion, and to live a life with the Pursuit of Happiness. However, across the nation, there are numerous cases in which school administrators violate students’ right to free speech. School officials are not utilizing their jurisdiction responsibly, and they are not following the First Amendment rights, due to unreasonably given punishments.

Campuses across the country have seen the rise of student protests against speakers over the recent years and several examples have turned violent. This is just one of the many issues involving free speech on campuses. As colleges and universities try their best to avoid controversy and disruption, free speech is put under pressure by policies that both limit and harm it. Regardless of whether they are legally allowed to do so, aren’t colleges and universities obligated to protect free speech? Without free speech protecting the communication and exchanging of ideas between students, higher education is just like primary/secondary education but with higher level courses. Many colleges and universities are guilty of obstructing free speech through policies aimed to take control of it: three common ways campus administrations dictate the limits of free speech are by implementing free speech zones that confine free expression to physical boundaries, involving security and police to supervise protests, and even disinviting speaker’s that were already invited. They may take these actions to prevent disruptions to the learning environment, but the result of their rules and regulations inhibit their students’ intellects, even though they pay tuition to learn at their schools.

The first amendment gives the people the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and petition. It also reserves the right for the people to choose their own religion by not allowing an established religion. However, there are restrictions to these rights in the law. Such restrictions include obscenity, profanity, libel and slander, fighting words, and clear and present danger. These restrictions are in place to protect the people. One law that goes against freedom of speech is the clear and present danger doctrine. This doctrine allows the government to punish words that "produce a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, and unrest;" this means although the people can say speak freely they cannot say anything that will cause panic. However, there is also the void-for-overbreadth doctrine, that protects speech invalidating laws written so broadly that the fear of prosecution creates a chilling effect that discourages people from exercising that freedom. The first landmark court case that ended up limiting the first amendment is Schenck v. United States. In this landmark case, Schenck mailed out a two-page flyer telling draftees to standup against the draft encouraging insubordination in the military and charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act. The court's decision was that Congress has the power to prevent and restrict speech that prevents a clear and present danger. Thus, creating the clear and

In the united states of america, the first amendment on the united states Constitution guaranteeing the right of free expression and action that are fundamental to democratic government. These rights include freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech. In december of 1966, a man named Clarence Brandenburg was sent was sent to prison and convicted for exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. In the summer of 1964 in Rural, Ohio, just north of Cincinnati, Clarence Brandenburg led a Ku Klux Klan rally and invites a Cincinnati news station to cover the event. The station agreed to it and started filming portions of the rally showing 12 men with hoods and robes and with some of whom carried firearms. and some shouting horrible ethic things plus they film them standing around a wooden cross and started burning it. Near the end of the rally, Brandenburg concluded the rally by saying a speech and portions of the speech were filmed live. He said, “"This is an organizers' meeting. We have had quite a few members here today which are -- we have hundreds, hundreds of members throughout the State of Ohio. I can quote from a newspaper clipping from the Columbus, Ohio Dispatch, five weeks ago Sunday morning. The Klan has more members in the State of Ohio than does any other organization. We're not a revengent organization, but if our President, our Congress, our Supreme Court continues to suppress the white, Caucasian race,

The first amendment in part states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” This amendment is said to be written for all and various groups of people, but can we say that children are also included in this group of people and are guaranteed the full extent of this right? Since the mid-20th century, various litigations and disputes have proven to put this question to debate. Is a child's right for free speech protected with political speech, and lewd, vulgar speech? Should the “prior restraint” rule be applied to students? What does the Supreme Court base itself to determine the limits of a child's rights? Can school districts limit a child's freedom of speech on social media? These questions will be analyzed and answered in the following paragraphs.