Free Speech For Sale Essay

Because the courts have ruled that in this context money is the same as speech, there is no reason that corporations should be able to hide their speech from the public. As shown in the documentary, PACs can follow around politicians and record their statements, yet this is not seen as an infringement on free speech. Likewise, having a record of “statements” made by corporations also does not infringe on free speech, as it does not at all prevent these corporations from speaking but instead allows others to know who is doing the

America holds the illusion of ‘land of the free and home of the brave.’ This by any means, is not true if we continue to classify big media corporations as free press. Big corporations like Fox news, CNN, Union Tribune, etc. are also referred to as mainstream media and are completely under the control of the elite 1%. Time and again mainstream media has proved as unrepresentative, only serving the ones who pay them. In a nation where democracy is valued, people rely heavily on news sources to gather information, therefore, they need sources who can provide uncensored information that enables them to make knowledgeable decisions about their government.

The public can now have a say in what they see, and this differs from ‘old guard newsrooms.’ Liquid journalism is intertwined, being a very fluctuating version. Generalizations do not seem to be the same words one would associate a journalist with. TV was free, but now people pay for in time and money. They are constantly looking for profit centers. Antitrust rulings keep companies from owning too much, and the companies are no longer stopped from syndicating by fin-syn. Buying smaller channels is a way for bigger companies to make money, too. CBS and NBC were the first two major companies for broadcasting. The FCC limits the sizes of conglomerates, questioned by the NRA. Critics argue that owning so much of each media type (radio, tv, newspaper) decreases competition of

Today’s media is far too consolidated. In 1983, fifty companies owned 90% of the media, but in 2011, that same 90% was owned by just 5 (1). This is why I propose that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lower the limit on the amount of market share that an organization can own; moving us closer to an ‘ideal democracy’. I also add the stipulation that if media was struggling to find a foot hold in the market, the FCC could grant all media outlets non-profit status; however, this stipulation is simply a clause in case breaking up outlets had unintended consequences and this will not be explored through this paper.

Six corporations, managed by 232 individuals, now own and run 90% of U.S. mass media news outlets, in a 14%, America the illiterate, voting population.

Over the centuries, the media has played a significant role in the shaping of societies across the globe. This is especially true of developed nations where media access is readily available to the average citizen. The media has contributed to the creation of ideologies and ideals within a society. The media has such an effect on social life, that a simple as a news story has the power to shake a nation. Because of this, governments around the world have made it their duty to be active in the regulation and control of media access in their countries. The media however, has quickly become dominated by major mega companies who own numerous television, radio and movie companies both nationally and

American universities are losing the ability to practice the use of free speech. The reason this has happened is due to political agendas that take away the ability to use free speech they do this by blocking people’s ability to express their thoughts with the threat of being called a racists or a bigot or even sexist this is causing the death of free speech and it is coddling the minds of American university students.

hat is free speech? Does the term ‘free speech’ cover offensive words? Painful ones? Words that disrespect others? What about objectionable, or even wrong beliefs? When is speech illegal? What is exactly meant by free speech? The term ‘free speech’ includes ‘hate speech’, and is therefore protected by the first amendment. This means that even messages we don’t like, agree with, feel uncomfortable about, or even are disgusted by, are legal. Unfortunately, many college students consider harmful words an assault, and some students believe that such verbal attacks can and should be met with violence. Students and speakers today are discriminated against in classrooms and other scenes where free speech and debate should be especially cherished.

The digital media is the largest form of communication in the developed world. When the media is perceived to be corrupted often freedom of speech and representation do as well. Many U.S. citizens believe that major corporate

It would have been inconceivable to the Founding Fathers that Americans would ever arrive to a point in time where large parts of American society would support limiting the freedom of speech against those who disagree with them. The right to free speech is so important that the entire First Amendment of the United States Constitution is dedicated to the right to free speech, giving Americans a responsibility to protect this right, even against those who they disagree with. Political events over the last several years has created an environment where those who spoke out against actions and policies of President Barak Obama were shut down as racist, with no consideration to the content of the argument to today where those who disagree with the loudest screamers are shut down as being Nazi’s, racists, and misogynists. The issue of freedom of speech is one that is of the utmost importance, but is one that is being eroded particularly on college campuses where it is no longer safe to have any opinion other than what those on the extreme left have. In the United States of America freedom of speech is a basic right afforded to all people, until college students and those on the left roll back their disdain for this core tenet of our nation, our culture, our way or life, and our freedoms are at risk.

Content generated by the media is vastly changing with time. Alongside, how the audience wishes to view content is changing as well. In the earlier times, only televisions and radios were used to transfer information. Nowadays, new platforms and websites are using different techniques to deliver content to their respective audience. On Netflix “Nobody Speak,” by Brian Knappenberger is one of the many information and knowledge packed documentary, that redefines the way viewers learn about the different meanings of certain phrases. One of the ways is freedom of speech, which enables individuals to express ideas and thoughts candidly. Different audience group will acknowledge different purposes to freedom of speech. Even though civilians hold the right to freedom of speech, it can also come with deadly consequences. The expression in the documentary holds a cruel and degrading meaning, even so, other reasons such as the rights of privacy might outweigh the separate statement. The case between Terry Bolea and Gawker refines how different audience ponders about the meaning freedom of speech. Expressing how freedom of speech and technology was misused to degrade one of the most renowned celebrities named Hulk Hogan, known initially as Terry Bolea.

With the rise of violence and technology we are able to view all the terrorist attacks, suicides, and protests going on in today’s world from just a click away. Becoming more educated on these topics, allows people to form opinions on these current events. This has pushed some Americans into believing that their needs to be a limit on free speech, to help prevent the catastrophes around the world. What makes America so great is that we are able to use our voices to express whatever we believe in order to educate others. Does America want the government being able to step down your throat on what you can or can’t say?

Democracy is one of the most significant contributions of the ancient Greeks, and it became one of the central sources for the development of Western civilization. The ancient Greeks were pioneers of free speech. Their theater, literature, and educational institutions explored the human experience, freedom of expression, and questioning of authority. Freedom of speech is the power or right to express one's opinions without censorship, restraint, or legal penalty, cornerstone of democracy. Throughout history freedom of speech has been the most feared threat to those in political, religious and administrative power positions. Consequently, freedom of speech is a powerful resource in order to approach truth and change, but now taken for granted, is misused. Freedom of speech does not give a person the right to do things that are harmful to society. Limitations are necessary in a democratic society for the protection of others such as false speech that harms reputation, threatening speech and speech intended to cause criminal activity.

In early January of 2015, gunmen opened fire on the editor and cartoonists of the Charlie Hebdo magazine in France. Charlie Hebdo is infamously known for publishing controversial political cartoons despite often receiving threats. After the attacks, many urged the magazine to stop publishing the high risk content. However, the magazine refused to be silenced as they felt they deserved their right to free speech. The magazine was not going to let the threat of terrorism win. Similarly, Twitter is dealing with the issue of free speech. Many are urging Twitter to hire more staff to filter out tweets deemed “unacceptable”. People believe that trolls are being given too much freedom to tweet as they please. However, Twitter should not be responsible for deleting tweets as it restricts free speech and promotes hypersensitivity.

Media possession is vital to the control of society. Control the individuals, and you control their vote. You either control the media by owning it or by doing favors to the individuals who own it. In the United States, vast companies possess the media and these, thus, get favors from the Government as impact over enactment and extraordinary tax cuts.