preview

Free Will In Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five

Decent Essays
Open Document

Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five describes the experience Billy Pilgrim had when he was involved in the Dresden bombing. Vonnegut uses aliens, Tralfamadore, and time traveling as a mirror for Billy to reflect on the society. As the book progresses Billy starts question the ethics in which the society influences him. Billy and the human race believes in free will: humans are in control for what has happened, what is happening, and what is going to happen. However, according to the philosophy of the Tralfamadorians, every event is a liner event: what has happened is happening, and going to happen is pre-determined. Billy sees thousands of people die and understood that this concept is unchangeable. The predetermination of death shows how human have absolutely no control over their destiny. Due to this, this book shows that there is no such thing as free will. …show more content…

The pillar of salt also shows how there will always be death, free will or not. “This one is a failure, and had to be, since it was written by a pillar of salt.” (28) “A pillar of salt” references to the Genesis 19, it tells the story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. When God decides to destroy those two cities, Lot’s family was given the advice to leave since they were nice to the angels. They were told to not look back, but Lot’s wife did. Thus, she turned into a pillar of salt. In this case, Vonnegut compares himself to Lot’s wife to show it is pointless, and even harmful. A pillar of salt means that nothing good can be gained when looking back at horrible events. Vonnegut cannot change it; the only things it will bring up are the shamefulness of humans killing each other, and potentially trigger diseases such as Posttraumatic stress disorder (P.T.S.D). Vonnegut uses “the pillar of salt” to show the needlessness of revisit death because one cannot change in the past and according to the Tralfamadorians “so it

Get Access