Freedom Of Choice And Abortion Analysis

The ongoing dispute of abortion has condemned the idea of women aborting their unborn child. Whether it be lack of support, critical physical or mental health, rape, or not being ready for such responsibility - all women have a reason for having an abortion. Therefore, women should have the free will to do what proves necessary and beneficial to themselves and their pregnancy.

The right of a women to control her reproductive decision is highly debated in the US because of the idea that abortions, to some people, are considered murder. A woman’s ability to make reproductive choices is a fundamental right protected by the

With so many women choosing to have abortions, it would be expected that it would not be so greatly frowned up, yet society is still having problems with its acceptance. Every woman has the fundamental right to decide for herself, free from government interference, whether or not to have an abortion. Today, more than ever, American families do not want the government to trample on their right to privacy by mandating how they must decide on the most intimate, personal matters. That is why, even though Americans may differ on what circumstances for terminating a crisis pregnancy are consistent with their own personal moral views, on the fundamental question of who should make this personal decision, the

In 2000, Frederica Mathewes-Green published “Unplanned Parenthood” in Policy Review, a conservative journal. In this article, Mathewes-Green stated that “[a]bortion is a tragic attempt to escape a desperate situation by an act of violence and self-loss,” and that society must make abortion its problem if it desires a decline in abortions anytime soon (Mathewes-Green 28). The first step to help women with their abortions is to “[provide them] with simple information about the risks of abortion and the availability of alternatives” (Mathewes-Green 30). With this step, society has a duty to inform a woman, prior to undergoing an abortion, that she may become a victim of some side effects associated with the procedure. That she may face infertility due to scraping from the suction tube or a weakened cervix that will not allow her to carry to full term. Not only must she be made aware of the risks, she must also know about the alternatives to abortion. In the United States, “there are approximately 3,500 pro-life agencies offering crisis pregnancy services” such as “shelter, medical care, counseling, maternity clothes, legal assistance, [and] other forms of aid” (Mathewes-Green 29). Most women are unaware of the choices they actually have since the rhetoric in mainstream media is always Pro-Life versus Pro-Choice without really delving into the choices that are available. The next step to help pregnant women is to increase the involvement of the child’s father. Nowadays, it is

In 1789, the French Revolution led to the Napoleonic wars and the Napoleon’s defeat. It also led to the restitution of the rule in Europe. As a result the Unites States government proclaimed the Monroe Doctrine as a deterrent to push European to help with the development of the western hemisphere. As a result, “thus began the chain of events that provided for liberation of several South and Central American countries.” (Gawronski 24) “Arizona’s fate was in the hands of the governor of New Mexico in Santa Fe.” (Gawronski 24) Helping with the development of Arizona were the mountain men. They marked all there trails so travelers come use them later. Also made friends with Indians who benefited them. The men gave their names to rivers, canyons

In the Judith Jarvis Thomson article on “A Defense of Abortion”, there is a lot of arguments that she points out as to why abortion of a child is not entirely wrong. She gives examples and analogies as to what could happen in a case of a woman when she becomes pregnant and is ill, and an abortion is necessary. She gives the readers various points of view on the issue of abortion, and is not seeming to be persuasive to be for or against abortions. It seems as though she is letting the reader understand all angles of the issue and giving the reader a chance to judge for themselves on if abortion is right or wrong considering all factors on what is morally and immorally correct.

In this article Jessica Valenti (2015) provides a supporting argument in a pro feminist direction, against the criminalization of women who seek out abortions within the US. As the author explains, women in desperate situations will do whatever they feel is necessary to end a pregnancy when they have decided that is what they want to do. It is necessary to provide support for these women, instead of alienating them further when they are in a vulnerable state.

An incredibly prevalent subject in the media today, abortion and a women’s right to choose has graced newsstands, social media platforms, and even the presidential debates. As such a controversial topic, abortion has a certain stigma attached to it. Viewed often as this “black and white” topic, many philosophy articles have been written about the grey area that seems to surround this argument, writing either for or against the topic. A particularly well known piece that does just that, argues that a fetus’s right to life does not trump a woman’s right to have control over her own body. “A Defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson Pro life versus

Although abortions can be seen in a negative light, with the argument of killing a living organism, a woman should not be forced, pressured, or burdened to keep and raise a child who she does not want or cannot support. Studies have shown that “families and society will benefit from having children that are planned, welcomed, and properly spaced” (Sanger, Alexander 6). Disregarding this option to women imposes injustice to themselves, and also the newborn baby, as every child should be a wanted child. Prohibiting and restricting abortions does not stop women from having them, as it only “forces abortion underground and makes it the privilege of the wealthy, while further disenfranchising poor women, who generally bear the brunt of such policies” (Ginsburg 253). The difference of class statuses can alter how an abortion is processed, as “for poor women, illegal abortions are typically done by unqualified practitioners- the woman herself, backroom abortionists- and the result in increased maternal deaths as well as maternal and fetal physical deformities” (Ginsburg 253). Women of higher status and authority may not enter such drastic measures for abortions, because they may have the resources to implement the abortion in a safer situation. It has been stated that, “Most Americans favor government regulations that officially discourage abortion and that make abortion difficult to access

We all live our lives as we please all in accordance to the law, but when it comes to abortion people start to judge and try to regulate how others live and interfere in their personal choices. We live in a country based on freedoms, and women have and should continue to have the freedom to the choice of an abortion. A woman’s right to choose abortion is a fundamental right recognized by the US Supreme Court. The courts also have a category of classes called the ‘near-suspect’ classes, which include gender. Gender deserves protection from possible discrimination at the hands of the majority. Women constitute a majority of American’s and have been discriminated in the past. The Landmark case Roe v. Wade was decided and remains the law of the land. Making laws against abortions don’t stop abortions from happening; they just make it less safe, which in many cases leads to death. Therefore idea of supporting pro-life is contradictory, this is why the nation should be pro-choice. No child should be brought into this world where they are not wanted or are not able to live a normal life. Most people who are against abortion will never even become pregnant, so they should not be making laws against it. Pregnancy is a private and personal matter. Outlawing abortion is discriminatory and unfortunately abortions are being transformed from a right to a privilege for most women.

Before the prevention of abortion was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme court in 1988, the law served as the biggest challenge that women faced when they decided to terminate a pregnancy. Pregnant women when prosecuted would be incarcerated for two years while the doctor who agreed to perform the operation would be imprisoned for life. These consequences served as great deterrence for people who performed abortions and women who wanted to get them. The social and economic consequences of continuing an unwanted pregnancy could also be dramatic, even in a developed country like Canada. Having a child can be a life-changing event that makes pursuing life goals in personal relationships, education and employment much more difficult. The law against abortion was struck down in Canada in part because the Supreme Court of Canada acknowledged that prohibiting abortion interfered with a woman’s ‘‘priorities and aspirations’’. These physical and social demands can indeed be welcomed in the case of a wanted pregnancy. However, if the pregnancy is unwanted and an abortion is denied, forcing a woman to endure the physical and emotional strain of pregnancy and childbirth, and the potential for socio-economic disadvantage can only be experienced as

Young women sit nervously as names are called, their bodies are shaking with fear. They wonder whether this decision is the right one, to leave or to stay, Her name is called and she rapidly says, “Nevermind” and walks out the door. She thinks to herself, getting an abortion would be killing a baby, and it's her own. Mothers that would like to receive an abortion are acting in a selfish matter, there are many people in the rest of the world with the disability of having a child and this woman is giving up a baby, something many others would love to have. Abortion is a trending topic around the USA and the rest of the world as it is a battle of choice and morality. Abortion is a narcissistic choice and it shows how horrible society has become.

When women decide against abortion, people expect that they will take care of their bodies and avoid drugs. However, some critics say that this expectation treats women as “fetal containers” and not rational beings. These critics believe that women should have the autonomy to behave how they want to, regardless of their pregnant status. In contrast, many people disagree with this. They believe that when a woman decides not

A legislative issue insinuates the approaches, portrayed and limited through legitimate documents, by which decisions laws are made in governments. In administrative issues, rights are the certifications and advantages legitimately yielded to individuals by the lawmaking body. Plus, in a majority rules framework, certain rights are thought to be essential, and along these lines not subject to surrender or withdrawal from the administration. Concerning the law, the political verbal meeting ordinarily includes a benefit to assurance, and when or how an organization may coordinate a direct abortion. Likewise, assault/rape is a dreadful wrongdoing, and no lady should have to live through such torment, however in the event that you take the position that the baby is a person and thusly has its own particular right to life, then the lady that was assaulted will just bear the mental scars of the assault, yet would likewise need to physically bring forth something that came

Throughout history, women have never had it easy; women experience prejudice, stereotypes, and injustice on a daily basis, in every aspect of life. Women are typically stereotyped to cater their husbands, keep up with the housework, and most importantly stay home and take care of their children. Typically, women are stereotyped to put being a mother as her number one priority; however, some women don’t want to be mothers. What if someone doesn’t want to be a mother, but accidentally gets pregnant? What is she to do now? She could choose to terminate the pregnancy by abortion, but sometimes health care plans do not cover abortions and sometimes there aren’t any abortion clinics available in that area. So as a second option, the woman could choose to have an illegal abortion by an unskilled practitioner, in an unsanitary environment, all while putting herself at risk for infections, illness, and even death of herself and the baby. As a third option, the woman could choose to go full term, birth the child, and then either raise it or place it for adoption. We live in a country with many freedoms, why should a woman not have the freedom to terminate a pregnancy, if that is what she wants? According to Social Work Speaks, research indicates that at least half of all pregnancies in America alone are unintended. From these pregnancies, about four out of ten of these unintended pregnancies have an end result of abortion. As a social worker, I recognize it is my duty to support