Freedom Writers Book Vs Movie Essay

Comparing the book to the movie you can clearly tell what certain things are different. For example, Sydelle Pulaski worked for Mr. Westing in the movie but only talked over the intercom. This not only caused a lot of drama but more depth to the plot. Also, Crow didn’t go to jail but they did talk about most of the consequences of her going to jail. This made a little bit more serious and emotional instead of just letting it go.

1) In the movie they brought Tommy to Shawshank, and already Andy Dufrense was working together with Tommy to improve his education. Tommy got a “C” average and was thankful to Andy. It wasn’t until later on Tommy is pulled aside to meet Norton about speaking the truth before a trial on Andy’s behalf. Without hesitation he says he would do it for Andy. Norton is disappointed and gives the signal to the guard on top of the tower, and poor Tommy was killed instantly. The book was different because instead of Tommy being killed, he was transferred to another prison to Norton’s benefit, thus keeping Andy to be his personal slave.

In the 1920s, when movies were a brand new concept, people went to see the pictures in order to escape from their lives. In these movies, everything worked out in the end and they depicted happy, perfect lives. As the Depression raged on, movies were a distraction from the wear and tear of normal life. With the movie Freedom Writers, however, that is not the case. Freedom Writers tells the impossibly true story of a first-year teacher, Erin Gruwell, and the difficulties she faced in her classroom of supposed hopeless cases. In Long Beach, California, her students dealt with gang violence, drugs, and racism in their everyday lives. They lived in constant fear. The movie emphasizes how Gruwell wrestles with the public school system, motivates her students to learn, and changes their lives in the process. Directed by Richard LaGravenese, it came out in 2007 with stars such as Hilary Swank, Patrick Dempsey, and April Hernandez gracing the screen (IMDb). In contrast to the early movies, Freedom Writers deals with issues that are still a problem today, such as a focus on the majority instead of helping students who need extra assistance or encouragement.

One way the book is different is the way Dave Isay play a major part in the kids live in the movie so you see the impact he has on them and the up and down with the documentary Ghetto Life 101. You don’t see that with the book because you only get Dave Isay point of view on the five pages unlike the movie where he in their live constantly. Also the part where Lloyd the part when Lloyd got beat up when his father cheated in a game of pool. That

Although the book has more information to the story, I like the movie better. The movie has a better storyline because in the book Angus has two homosexual parents that eventually end up getting a divorce because both parents leave each other for another partner of the same sex. In the movie, the dad left the family a while back and Angus is left with a single mother and his grandfather, who lives with them. The grandfather in the movie basically is the father figure for

Both the book and the movie are great, but there are some major differences that separate the book from the movie. It seems that they

They decided to call themselves the Freedom Writers after learning about the Freedom Riders who fought during the civil rights movement. They turned their journal entries into a book that would eventually be published under the title; The Freedom Writers Diary.

There were a lot differences between the book and the movie. The movie started off with Melanie in the bird store, and Mitch went in there to investigate her for a case. The book started off with Nat on a farm describing how that years weather had been different. In the book the main guy character had a wife and kids. In the movie the main guy character was not married, but had a mom and

The movie and novel were both really good, but they just had some differences. For example, the format was different because when your reading a novel you have to make your own visual picture on what is happening and make up what you think the characters are like. While watching a movie the creators

In the book, there are many chapters that help the reader get to know the characters better. This is done not by telling the reader about the character, but through events that the characters go through. Another thing was that I felt like the book had more emotion, but I think this was because I had gotten to know the characters in the book better than I did in the movie. The book is also narrated from Scout’s perspective, while the movie is not. This changes the feel of the story, making the movie feel a little bit less personal than the book.

One reason I liked the book better is because I could understand the tessering concept better in the book than in the movie. It explained it more in the book than in the movie. In the movie it kind of just immediately talked about it for a minute and continued, in the book it takes a whole chapter to explain the concept of tessering. So it was harder to understand tessering in the movie.

Books that are made into movies often don’t stay true along the written words. You can’t really compare and contrast them because it would be desecrating the movie and book because they both might be satisfied no matter who was the characters behind them. A book that was made into a movie called , “The Member Of the Wedding Summary” . It Is a really good book and movie, but there are something different and the same about them and the main character who plays in both called Frankie.

One of the major differences was the change in perspective. In the book, the story was told through a nine-year-old’s perspective, which allowed the reader to be led through the horrible events without having any prior knowledge. However, in the film the story was told

In the movie they show her living with her husband and doing things with her father. In the book it shows more of the perspective of the kids and what’s happening in their life. In the perspective in the movie it starts off with News reports about long beach and how there’s riots and gang members also how tention reach an all time high. Eva’s diary entry, Eva starts off the movie with her diary and she talks

The film Freedom Writers directed by Richard La Gravenese is an American film based on the story of a dedicated and idealistic teacher named Erin Gruwell, who inspires and teaches her class of belligerent students that there is hope for a life outside gang violence and death. Through unconventional teaching methods and devotion, Erin eventually teaches her pupils to appreciate and desire a proper education. The film itself inquiries into several concepts regarding significant and polemical matters, such as: acceptance, racial conflict, bravery, trust and respect. Perhaps one of the more concentrated concepts of the film, which is not listed above, is the importance and worth of education. This notion is