French Imperialism In Vietnam

Assess the consequences of the Vietnamese victory against the French for Indochina in the periods 1954-1964.

During the Indochina war, the United States aided the French, but if we inspect France

The Vietnam war is exactly the kind of situation George Washington had in mind when he warned the future leaders of the United States against alliances. While they offer a level of security, they can also be a liability especially when you are as strong as the United States was in the middle of the twentieth century. And this is exactly what happened in Vietnam, when the United States becomes too invested in our commitment to allies it hinders our ability to focus on domestic policy. The question we should have asked before getting involved is, “how will this affect our ability to build from within?” During the Vietnam war, this would have meant compromising our foreign agenda, such as the multinational army. The United States then would have had the ability to maintain their appearance of a loyal alliance to the rest

The Vietnam War was one of the bloodiest wars in the history of Vietnam. Vietnam use to be a peaceful country until the idea of communism started spreading across Vietnam. Many wanted to stay democratic but saw what happened to the Germans and started to lean towards communism. Many also wanted to stay democratic and still had it hopes high that it will soon get their lives and economy back on track.

In the 19th century, France colonized “Indochina”- what is now known as Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia- to exploit the environment for economic gain, under the guise of wanting to spread

After reading “The Vietnam Wars” I found out that the Vietnamese are very proud of their country and culture. First of all, in paragraph one, “The Chinese Dragon”, the author said that “The Trung sisters led the first uprising, then drowned themselves rather than surrender.” This quote from the text explains that the Vietnamese people were so proud of their culture they would rather die than surrender. Secondly, in paragraph three, “Life, Liberty, and Ho Chi Minh,” after defeating the Japanese with the aid of Americans the author says, “Ho mounted a platform in Hanoi’s Da Dinh Square and it was decorated with flowers and banners. During the ceremony the crowd chanted “Doc Lap” while they were granted independence.” Hundreds of thousands showed

As well as taking office in 1969, U.S. President Richard Nixon introduced a new strategy to office called Vietnamization that was aimed towards finally ending American involvement in the Vietnam War (1954-75) by moving all military responsibilities to South Vietnam. This increasingly unpopular war had made deep division in American society, so Nixon believed his Vietnamization strategy, which involved building up South Vietnam’s military strength in order to create a slow building withdrawal of all U.S. troops, would prepare the South Vietnamese government to take responsibility for their own defense. In 1973, the U.S. negotiated a treaty with North Vietnam, withdrew American fighting troops and then declared the Vietnamization process complete.

America’s involvement in Vietnam goes back to World War II when it was still a French colony. After World War II, Vietnam was divided at the 17th parallel with the Geneva Accords into the Communist North and Democratic South. The proxy war in Vietnam occurred in the Turbulent Sixties, after the Eisenhower years which the death of Stalin occurred. John F Kennedy was assassinated; with instability in the nation, Lyndon Johnson was installed as president.

The Vietnam War caused a spike in American deaths in the 1960’s. Even more Vietnamese citizens died due to United States troops. Children in South Vietnam wandered the streets as they yell for their dead parents. Soldiers lose their sanity over seas and kill there own United States soldiers. Even though the government told citizens the war would be over soon, the war seemed like a never ending battle full of ruthless killings and long suffering deaths.

Following the publication of the British Chilcot Inquiry, there has been increased debate on the validity of former Prime Minister John Howard’s decision to commit troops to Iraq without parliamentary approval in 2003. Although the Constitution vests the exercise of War Prerogatives in the Governor-General, in practice this power is subject to a variety of factors. In recent times, calls have been made to mandate a parliamentary veto power. In doing so, perhaps the equilibrium of military efficiency and democratic legitimacy can be achieved.

Vietnam, January 31, 1968. The Vietcong and the North Vietnamese army has just launched a large surprise attack on the U.S and South Korea during the holiday of Tet, engaging in over 120 cities and U.S occupied bases throughout South Vietnam and Cambodia. This large offensive was led by Ho Chi Minh and other leaders in the North. Their goal: to weaken U.S. forces to wean off from guerilla attacks and carpet bombings in the North. They never knew that this historical attack would become an important role in weakening U.S. public support for the war in Vietnam. Therefore, the Tet Offensive was a major turning point in the Vietnam War regarding public support.

To understand the US involvement in Vietnam, it is necessary to understand the background of traditional independence and opposition to larger powers throughout Vietnamese history. The Vietnamese had a long history and tradition of opposing invading powers. This opposition and culture was to draw the U.S. into the longest war it has been involved in. This was an indirect but vitally important cause of US involvement in the Vietnam War. As early as 500BC, Vietnam was a country that held a strong sense of nationalism, and endeavoured for the goal of autonomy, independence, and self-rule. Up until modern history, there have been several events that have contributed towards intensifying this sense of nationalism and resistance against foreign powers. National resistance against the Chinese empire was one of the earliest examples of resistance against nationalism. Throughout the period of pre-modern history from 210 BC to 1789, resistances against foreign control and rule such as that against the Nan Yue, the Song, the Ming, and the Qing, were frequent. These attempts at national resistance came down to the basis that the nationalist Vietnamese did not want foreign influence determining the political future, culture, or customs of their country. Another main example that increased a sense of nationalism was French Colonialism. The French, who were appealed by Vietnam’s unique location, natural resources, and the extensive economic opportunities

We are fortunate enough to live in a very peaceful world. Human beings naturally conflict with one another. The cause of wars is usually multifaceted, with people often fighting for cultural freedoms, idealistic beliefs, or power. Throughout the semester, we watched many films dealing with these issues, many in which revolve around the American influence in these conflicts. Thus, the films “Taxi to the Dark side” directed by Alex Gibney, “The Trials of Henry Kissinger” directed by Eugene Jarecki, “Last Days in Vietnam” directed by Rory Kennedy, and “Night and Fog” directed by Alain Resnais, all disclose the role of American influence within these troubles regions. It is important to examine the influence of war and conflict on the inhabitants within these nations, as often they cannot

The colonialism of Vietnam by the French lasted for approximately six decades. In the late of 1880s, the French had the control of the Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos, commonly known as the French Indochina (Indochine Francais) (Mason 7). As such, Indochina was able to assume the status of being the lucrative colonial possessions of the French. It became the French empire, which spanned the western and northern Africa, the Caribbean and Pacific empires. The French formulated the civilizing mission as a way of justifying their imperialism in the land. Such mission existed as a form of the “white man” burden for the English. The imperialists from France made claims that they had the responsibility of colonizing the regions in Asia and Africa,

According to the study of Savada (1995) mentioned that there are 3 main reasons causing France to colonize Laos which are France had a competition with England to imperial countries in Asia, the French had changed and developed to be a path of trade in order to transport goods to China and countries in Indochina such as Vietnam and Cambodia, and lastly, Laos is an abundance of natural resources country fulfilling with precious stones such as gold, and tin; in addition, forest resources such as timbers. Therefore, Laos have been seen as an underdeveloped small country and easy to conquer and it was seen to be take advantages rather than developed by