Friedrich Nietzsche's Arguments Against Animal Testing

As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.

Every twelve months, more than 100 million creatures are executed in U.S. research facilities for chemical, medication, food, and cosmetics testing; science lessons; and interest driven experimentations (“Medical Testing on Animals Is Cruel And Unnecessary” 1). Some people are convinced that testing medicines on animals is needed so that one day, there may be

Animals can be ferocious and wild, but they can also be gentle and tame. Some are our pets, and some are powerful forces that are to be respected and admired. It is as easy to appreciate a loyal dog as it is to be in awe of a lion in its' natural habitat. But the truth that many people either don’t know or don’t appreciate is that animals are essential to human existence and have played a vital role in improving the quality of our lives. They have been providing us with answers to our most complex medical questions for decades. Their role in finding cures for diseases, treatments for illness, and product safety is immense. First, we will examine how animal testing has

Animals do not suffer from the same diseases that us humans have, for example curing heart failure induced by cutting a dogs aorta will not help to cure heart failure caused by a build-up of cholesterol in human arteries. We waste animal lives everyday and for what? The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous. And of the small percentage of drugs approved for human use, half end up being relabeled because of side effects that were not identified in tests on animals. This makes it extremely dangerous to humans, because animal testing is not dependable, it can cause serious side effects to humans that weren’t an issue to the animals during testing.

In archaic medical training courses, pigs and dogs are cut open and killed and cats and ferrets have hard plastic tubes forced down their delicate throats.” Animal testing isn’t even 100 % accurate, because animal’s biological makeup is different than our own, and the results are usually misleading. Testing is required for certain drugs, vaccines, chemicals, cosmetics, and other products we use on our bodies, or put in our bodies. Most tests kill over 2,000 animals every time they are used.

Just in the United States, “there are about 26 million different species, from dogs to birds, being used every year for medical and science related testing” (“Animals in Science / Research”). Throughout the process of testing, “monkeys are addicted to drugs, cats are deafened and have holes drilled into their skulls, sheep and pigs have their skin burned off, and rats have their spinal cords crushed” (“Animals in Medical Experiments”). As a result, animals face cruel conditions and have no way of fighting back. Although medical testings on animals may cure the deadliest diseases such as cancer and tuberculosis, the abuse and mistreatment these animals face while testing medicines should be deemed inhumane, and such practices should be banned in the United States.

Although animal testing was a main component for the facilitation of medical research in the past, it is no longer necessary due to the option of alternate testing methods. Animals that fall victim to the mercy of animal research are subject to experimentation for the purpose of manufacturing harmless products (McKnight 2). Cell cultures, the MIMIC system, TraumaMan, in vitro, and human volunteers are substitutes for this inhumane procedure (Sullivan 4; “PCRM Scientists Educate” 10). Animal testing is a cruel, outmoded method that sacrifices the lives of innocent animals, despite the availability of humane alternatives.

A computer or cells grown in labs will most likely not have the same effects as a living, breathing animal. The article “Myths and Facts” states that problems with the medicine will often show up in animal tests. A medicine given by mouth could be altered by digestion, changing the effects and may becoming less effective or toxic. It is important, and is required by law, to find out about potential problems before medicines are given to humans. And it is also a law that if other techniques are possible to use then the should be used rather than animal testing.(Myths and Facts). If there is a law that says that if there is another way to test, use it, and animal testing is still used to this day, then that must mean that animal testing is the best way to test in most cases. Sean O’Neil says that humans are biologically very similar to other mammals. All mammals used for testing have the same organs, a bloodstream and a nervous system. So animals are an essential part of many of the medicines we have. In fact, some fear that if animal testing was not allowed, the medical research may stop altogether (O’Neil). As you can see, animal testing is the best way to test

Though many of us will agree that animal testing is acceptable, however, it is an unfortunate decision to do when there are many other alternatives used to treat diseases. These animals can’t control what is being done with them. They can’t tell us how they feel. Making human’s lives better should not be the reason for the torturing of animals. The value that humans place on their own lives should be extended to the lives of animals as

The above examples on animal testing is an evidence that the use of animals in scientific research has and is beneficial for the treatment in medications of asthma, diabetes, polio, and several other health disorders, in the human lives. Furthermore, research in medical science with the help of animal testing might also bring cures for AIDS, cancer and other severe diseases (Singer 2013). Uses of animals have no other alternatives because many animals such as rabbits, monkeys or rats have several similarities in physical processes as compared to human bodies. Through animal testing, scientists have been able to test the negative and positive effects of medicines. If a certain medicine is found with negative effects in animals, it is considered unsafe for human lives as well(Christensen, Johnson and Turner 2011).

Stated by Mahatma Gandhi, “The greatness of the nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated”. Medical research on animals is an effective way for scientist to test different medical discoveries and experiment before using them on humans to check their result. This technique has been used for centuries dating back to people such and Aristotle and Erasistratus. What exactly is medical research on animals? When we take a deeper look into the experiment that are preformed we can conclude that animals are a living model of humans in these laboratories. It is a necessity to harm and test animals with new drugs in order to market them in the medical industry to aid human illnesses. In order to better comprehend and regulate drugs one must understand what medical research on animals is described as and its benefits to pharmaceutical companies for humans. Exposure to the trials and tribulations that animal testing reveals how important it is for scientists to understand the negative effects they contribute to an animal’s welfare and life. In contrary animal testing has been used to save many human lives from consuming or using a drug that could have caused them life threatening illnesses.

Every year, millions of animals suffer through painful and unnecessary tests. Animals in laboratories all over the world live lives of deprivation, pain, isolation, and torture. Even though vast studies show that animal experimentation often lacks validity, leading to harmful human reactions, we still continue to use this method of experimentation, while many other less-expensive and more beneficial alternatives exist. Going beyond the issue of animal experimentation being morally wrong, this form of research is also hindering medical progress. Although the use of animals in laboratories is said to be necessary for the welfare and health of humans, people mistakenly believe that this immoral and unscientific method of experimentation is

An animal is taken, injected with all kinds substances, then killed from the tests ran by researchers. Meanwhile, an old woman is laying on her death bed waiting for the same researchers to find a cure but dies before researchers can succeed. Which scenario do you think is worse? This is a difficult question and may not have an answer. Animal testing has been around for centuries starting with early Greek physicians around 384 BC. These Greek physicians included Aristotle, Erasistratus, and Galen, who all created huge contributions to medical history. Throughout history animal testing has helped to cure many diseases including polio, diabetes, smallpox, and many more. These cures have helped save thousands of lives and would not have been possible without the help of animals. However, these contributions did not occur without the cost of hurting animals in the process. There have been some laws, like the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, that requires safety testing of drugs on animals before they can be sold. Both animal lives and human lives are affected by animal testing in many ways, making this topic very important. 100 million animals die each year due to animal testing but there are also many diseases that haven’t been cured, making animal testing necessary. Animal testing has both saved lives and taken them away. Us humans have to decide how many animal lives are worth the knowledge gained. In this paper I will address and analyze two alternate perspectives,

Everyday, biomedical researchers, ethicists, and government officials have to choose between sacrificing the lives of helpless individuals or innocent animals. Animal testing Is said to be a necessary evil, and without it medical advancement would be severely halted. Medical researchers claim medical progression is their duty to humanity. In order to do their job quickly, animal testing is a necessity. Opponents to medical researchers, animal rights activists argue it isn't humanities right to to take innocent animals lives. They push the medical field to find a better solution.

An estimated 115.3 million animals around the world are used every year for commercial and scientific testing(“Experiments Around World”). The use of these animals in testing is to develop ideas and drugs for medical treatment, determine how toxic the medicines are, check the safety before human use, and many other diseases and health care issues. So are animals the best option that scientists have to test on? Right now there are millions of mice, rabbits, cats, dogs, primates and other animals stuck in cages across the country so alone and frightened(Animal Testing 101). These harmful tests that scientists perform on animals represent bad science and a highly unethical practice.