Fro Creationism Should Not Be Taught In Schools Essay

The question as to whether or not creationism should be taught in public schools is a very emotional and complex question. It can be looked at from several different angles, its validity being one of them. Despite the lack of evidence to support the fundamentalist idea of creationism, that in itself is not enough to warrant its exclusion from the curriculum of public schools in the United States. The question is far more involved and complex.

Should religion, such as Christianity, be taught in public school? Droves of people, theists and atheists alike, ask and answer that question every day, but it is usually met with much scorn and heated arguments. A compromise can be reached, however. Even though Creationism is not scientifically supported, it does need to be taught in public schools, with one major difference; it should be taught only in history classes, owing to the fact that it has contributed to important events in history. Students need that perspective to understand certain historical events and why some people did what they did.

Evolutionism is the belief that all living things on Earth have developed from an earlier form. It states that humans have progressively advanced over time through a process called evolution. Creationism on the other hand, states that the world and human beings were created by God.The main problem that arises is when we have determine which of the two theories is correct and we should inclined to. Although evolution seems more credible due to the amount of evidence it has, neither theory presents ideas that are entirely clear and known with certainty. Natural selection is the only known theory that can explain the existence of adaptation in nature. However, this does not mean that natural selection is the driving force throughout evolution,

However, teachers who in the classrooms have not been adequately prepared to take on such a sensitive and sometimes controversial issue. It is important that the educational system employs teachings that are able to fairly and effectively teach students about religion (Passe & Wilcox, 2009, page 104). This is where the change in the source of religion in schools needs to begin. Passe and Wilcox state, “teachers can be leaders in demonstrating how to do it well” (2009, page 106). In this quote, Passe and Wilcox are referencing the kind of impact that teachers can have on others and society by correctly leading in a way that shows that religion can be taught in a way that is acceptable. The problem lies within the curriculum. Passe and Wilcox’s focus on the changes that are occurring in the curriculum in our educational system and how there has been changes and the focus has move away from where religion should be taught and what content it should be taught with. Passe and Wilcox state that “social studies … is gradually disappearing from the … curriculum in favor of literacy and mathematics (2009, page 104). Within our schools, there is the less focus on social studies because of it does not hold the same value as other subjects because of their importance on standardized tests. Passe and Wilcox makes a firm point by state that “we cannot teach history without teaching about religion”

In public schools, evolution is taught as the way the world came to be. In most cases, if a student believes otherwise they get in trouble for talking about their own beliefs. Many people who follow different religions believe creationism. Creationism should be taught in public schools as a valid view of how earth and present forms came to be.

Evolution is theory based on Darwin's theory of natural selection. The theory of natural selection states, “ The process of nature by which … only the organisms best adapted to their environment tend to survive and transmit their genetic characters into increasing numbers to succeeding generations while those

Ken Ham, president of Answers in Genesis, wrote on the organization’s website, “If teaching creation were mandated, it would likely be taught poorly (and possibly mockingly) by a teacher who does not understand what the Bible teaches and who believes in evolution.” While Ham does have a point, leaving one common theory completely out of schools is robbing students of their education. They should at least be taught differing ideas and be able to make an educated decision of which they might support. I propose that educators be required to give students a list of ideas about origins, or have it taught by an unbiased and certified teacher.

The idea is that if there is no Creator, there is no creation, and teaching creation would violate the establishment clause in the Constitution. The clause prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress. If the education system rely on the definition of science, it is true that evolution theory would be the best fit. However, the evolution theory manipulates the idea of science, the theory has never actually been scientific nor experimental, and is just an interpretation of an assumption. The evolution theory assumes that there is no supernatural activities in the universe. Thus, how does this assumption differ from the belief of creationism? At least, creationism explains the idea and suggestion on how the human being exist and the process of creating the

If you walk into a public school science classroom and ask the students what they were taught pertaining to the creation of the universe, most likely the majority of them will talk about the Big Bang theory or the theory of evolution. This has always been a topic of interest that has caused many debates on whether public schools should teach creationism in the classrooms. Creationism is the belief that the universe was created by specific acts of divine creation and is more known as Genesis to the Abrahamic religions. In my opinion creationism is a subject that should be taught alongside of science because it can develop critical thinking skills for the students, it will satisfy the demand of the people, and will fulfill our freedom of speech.

Evolution simply talks about “the origin of life through natural processes” (Lamoureux). From a true scientist’s view, it is preposterous to even think of letting creationism venture into the science world and become one with the community due to the insurmountable evidence at hand. Not everything, however, is at ease of access to the public, making it mildly difficult to gather information to write or type a paper, unless the person is a professional. Creationists on the other hand think that due to the “scientific” information they have believe that they deserve the right to collaborate with public schools which is completely reasonable. Creationism very simply states that “the world was made by a creator”. Evolution is about the evidence that is on hand and can be observed by any of the senses while creationism is not really concerned with why or how the world was created but more along the lines of the “fact” that the world came along from creation and nothing else

Fear is a natural emotion instilled in every capable human being. Fear is often caused by lack of knowledge. Religion has caused fear in many people’s lives, due to the fact of not knowing and fearing things that are different than one's own belief. The diversity in today’s society calls for a great need to educate children on the different religious beliefs of others. Seeking knowledge about religions helps further education as well as social skills. This knowledge could also cause a troubled child to change for the better and improve academically as well as socially. Another great benefit of putting religion as a school curriculum would be that there are great career opportunities when one has a degree majoring in religion and or theology.

A topic that’s highly controversial in the United States is the teaching of Creationism in public schools. This topic is a hotspot for conservatives and liberals alike, both having views that differ drastically each other. Creationism is the theory that a higher power created the universe and all living beings. Although, the theory is widely believed by many Christians and other religious groups across the United States, it should not be taught in public schools for many reasons.

With most of the western world rooted around Christianity and the values of the Bible, it is only fair it is taught in public schools. Being referenced about 1,300 times by perhaps one of the most famous writers

Teaching Creationism or Intelligent Design to our youth can be done in a way that is neither opinion based nor completely fact based, but may hold some risk of personal interpretation. The first thing needed to be considered is how can children of the middle school age range grasp such a deep subject and have the capacity to reach their own conclusion. Information found regarding the development of children in this developmental range was found in the book titled "Characteristics of Middle Grade Students,” Caught in the Middle by the Sacramento Department of Education. It was found that students of this age hold a variety of learning attributes that support the belief that children can handle both sides of this controversial issue. Some

While normally this would be related to culture, social science or philosophy, it matters here because both creationism and science teach origins of life. There are many Christians who would like to know about creationism and evolution, and students should be able to learn about each. Because of these reasons, both should be taught so the students are exposed to diverse information and perspectives so they can decide for themselves. The debate on teaching creationism, evolution, or both in public schools has been an issue in the United States since the Scopes Monkey Trial