Fugl-Meyer Assessment Paper

Some assessment tests that can be done to determine areas of occupational dysfunction important to the person are the Canadian Occupational Performance (COPM) interview, the Robinson Bashall Functional Assessment, the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire, the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS), manual muscle tests, the goniometer, and the dynamometer and pinch meter (Hammond, pp 257). The Robinson Bashall Functional Assessment, as well as the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire, is a functional assessment that allows the therapist to get a better understanding of the practical capabilities of patients that are suffering from RA. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills allows an accurate estimate of ability to do IADLs based on performance of three tasks.

When one administered the dynamometer to measure gross motor strength while another one administered the lateral pinch meter for fine motor strength, there was a significant different in the amount of strength between Angelo’s right upper extremity and left upper extremity. After three trials on both arms through both of these assessment tools occurred, the results indicated that his left upper extremity was significantly weaker than his right upper extremity, all because of his cerebrovascular

A clinician, respectively, should produce the patient’s clinical history and results, as well as the measurement properties of the index, this well better format and put in place short- and long-term goals based on an individual-report functional scale like the LEFS (1). The intention of this research was to assess the reliability, construct validity, and sensitivity to change the Lower Extremity Functional Scale. This test was given to 107 patients with lower-extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction referred to twelve outpatient PT clinics. This index was dispensed during the patient’s initial assessment, 24 to 48 hours following the initial assessment, and then at weekly intervals for four weeks (1). A patient with an initial LEFS score of 56/80, an example of lower extremity functional scale is to create functional level, set goals, and track progress and outcome, based on the error at any specific position in time for the LEFS of five points, the therapist can be highly confident that the actual scale score is between 51 and 61 (1). The leeway, or error, associated with an assumed measure on the LEFS is about plus or minus five scale points (90% confident intervals). A clinician, ergo, can be moderately confident that an observed score within the parameter of five points of the patient’s “true” outcome (1). The short-form 36-health survey (SF-36) is a 36-item, patient-delivered

First, the manual muscle test (MMT) established by Daniels and Worthingham evaluates muscle strength in six stages, ranging from 0 (no muscle contraction) to 5 (able to resist strong resistance). The hip joint flexor muscle strength and knee joint extensor muscle strength on the affected side were measured, and the average of the two measurements was used in the analysis. Second, the motor age test (MAT) is based on an evaluation table in which typical motor items in normal childhood development are converted into scores. Scores are allocated to individual motor items. The score varies from 0 to 72 points (or 0–72 months), where 72 points represents the greatest motor ability. Third, Katz’s index (KI) is basic motions of daily living activity in a hospital room were evaluated at the time of initiation of exercise in a rehabilitation room. The KI evaluates whether the patient can perform the following six items, by themselves or with assistance, bathing, dressing, going to the lavatory, movement, self-control of urination and defecation, and eating meals. The evaluation is made using seven categories, from A (all items are performed independently) to G (all items need assistance), based on the number of items performed

Participation in the study will lead to results clarifying the best treatments for individuals that have experienced a stroke with impact to cognitive functioning. This information will be extremely useful to society as many individual’s experience strokes in their lifetime. The data obtained from the study will allow health professionals to partake in evidence based practice, reinforcing the concept of best practice for their patients. Referencing the study will allow the professionals to select the intervention with the strongest results, therefore leading to most improved cognitive functioning in individuals post

support early intervention of cognitive rehabilitation of having a great effect on improving ADL participation in stroke patient. The first article from Cochrane library titled “Cognitive rehabilitation for executive dysfunction in adults with stroke or other adult non-progressive acquired brain damage” by Charlie et al discuss which adaptive technique was used to assist stroke survivors who have cognitive impairment, but intact motor function to became independent in the ADL. The research was completed on “19 studies of 907 randomized participants, 496 TBI, 344 strokes, 67 other acquired brain injury. Data were available to potentially include 13 of the studies within meta-analyses (770 participants, 417 TBI, 304 stroke, 49 other acquired brain injury), with 660 participants who are related to the research were included in the treatment groups to be studied in the review. Studies performed during the research were related to (1) cognitive rehabilitation versus sensorimotor meta-analyses (one study, 86 participants), (2) cognitive rehabilitation versus no intervention or placebo meta-analyses (four studies, 184 participants) and (3) experimental cognitive rehabilitation versus standard cognitive rehabilitation meta-analyses (eight studies, 404 participants)”

Since the decline in motor activities over the course of the disease cannot be avoided, it is important to use functional assessment scales for use in clinical follow-up, establishment of functional diagnosis and therapeutic decisions making. Several functional scales exist for the assessment of individuals with diseases associated with neuromuscular. Subsequently, the Vignos scale (VS) lays more focus on functional activities involving the lower limbs

The subjects of the study were ten people who had recently had a stroke, two were women and eight were men. Additionally, these people had only one leg affected and were able to safely use all the testing equipment. Each person was first subject to four tests for a clinical assessment to better understand the subjects. These tests were the Modified Ashworth Scale, Timed Up and Go Test, manual muscle testing, and a test to determine the person’s range of motion.

They defined one independent variable as group, referring to either healthy control or GH injury. The other independent variable was defined as functional exercise, which consisted of bow and arrow (BA), external rotation with scapular squeeze (ERSS), lawnmower, and robbery. The dependent variables were identified as normalized muscle-activation from the serratus anterior (SA), upper trapezius (UT), middle trapezius (MT), and lower trapezius (LT). These values were used to calculate ratios of muscle-activation (Moeller, Huxel Bliven, & Snyder Valier,

Handgrip strength, a simple, easy, rapid, reliable, valid, and cheap approach, has been commonly used to measure muscle strength (Lauretani et al., 2003). Handgrip strength is intensely associated with lower muscle power, knee extension and calf cross-sectional muscle area (Cruz-Jentoft et al., 2010). Handgrip strength is also a predictor of disability of activities of daily living (ADL) among older adults (Al Snih et al., 2004). Handgrip strength is an element of the comprehensive older adult screening tool (COAST).

a trace contraction is noted in the muscle by palpating the muscle while the patient attempt to contract,

Brain foundation 2011, A-Z of disorders, Stroke, Brain Foundation, Sydney, viewed 30 June 2011, .

“Stroke is leading cause of death and the major cause of adult neurological disability. In the USA, 795 000 stroke occur every year.” (name ) The proportion rises most strongly with age, therefore with the

Appropriate selection of CIMT as an intervention is essential, depending on the patient’s severity of stroke, functional limitations, and cognitive level. Our PICO question of “in middle-aged stroke patients, will CIMT compared to no treatment improve functional outcomes?” has been analyzed through multiple studies. CIMT has shown positive effects in improving function and quality of use of affected upper extremity in stroke patients. CIMT can produce cortical reorganization that increases the area of cortex involved in the innervations of movement of the more-affected limb (Taub, 1998). It is recommended that future studies be conducted to evaluate the long-term effects of CIMT years after treatment. Depending on a patient’s individual health

The ability to predict early an accurate prognosis for motor recovery after stroke is important as it could provide useful information for specific rehabilitation strategies and final motor outcomes. In fact, decisions on the type, duration, and goals of rehabilitation are based on several factors, including estimates of the patient’s potential for recovery of motor function, and have far-reaching consequences. The ability to evaluate the expected level of motor and functional recovery after stroke may help in early decision-making on medical and rehabilitation treatments as well as in research trials for assessment of intervention effects. Improvements in the accuracy of prognosis for the recovery of independence in daily activities would enable realistic goal-setting and efficient resource allocation by clinicians and patients. Therefore, many of previous studies have attempted to predict motor outcomes in stroke patients using various methods, including clinical findings (Hendricks et al., 2002), MRI (DeVetten et al., 2010; Schiemanck et al., 2006), functional MRI (Marshall et al. 2009), diffusion tensor tractography (DTT)