Fukushima Research Paper

This caused reactors 1 through 3 to go into a meltdown and it created a situation where Japan was on the brink of a major environmental disaster. To fully understand the different events there will be a focus on: factors that caused the meltdown, why this did not impact the other three reactors, the consequences, who is responsible and how these incidents can be prevented in the future. Together, these elements will highlight the underlying effects of this disaster and its impact on the region. ("Fukushima Accident")

The Fukushima disaster was caused by an earthquake and its following tsunami which caused a failure in the backup systems (World Nuclear Association, 2016). The tsunami knocked out the generators that powered the cooldown processes for three of the Fukushima power plants which caused the radiation leaks and other complications. Consequentially, the disaster was initially classified as a level 5 on the INES scale. Further investigation after the disaster was under control changed it to a level 7 disaster, the highest level on the INES scale. The estimated radioactive releases were about one tenth of Chernobyl, the worst nuclear disaster in history.

While the immediate threat of nuclear war has diminished since the end of the Cold War, nuclear threats remain an imminent concern to be prepared for. Recent events, such as the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster, show us that although the possibility of ICBMs raining down may be less there is still a need to be ready for nuclear radiation.

On March 11th, 2011 an earthquake with a magnitude of 9.0 struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. The actual earthquake did minimal damage to all 4 reactors. The resulting tsunami destroyed the 16 diesel backup generators dedicated to cooling the reactors. As a result of overheating, hydrogen explosions damaged Reactors 1, 2, and 3. Reactor 4 was offline for maintenance at the time, but over 1,400 fuel rods in a stored above the reactor were exposed to air. The result was the release of approximately 370,000 terabecquerels of radiation. The situation was declared a Level 7 (major ongoing radioactive accident) by the International Atomic Energy Agency . The only other time this level has been reached was at Chernobyl in 1986.

radioactive nuclides from spreading. Coupled with their slower response time and lack of high quality equipment, their rescuing was slowed down and not as productive as it could have been. More lives could have been helped with advanced equipment and proper attire.

The nuclear technology debate returns. Narrations about nuclear power in post-Fukushima Japanese and Western films

After Fukushima, the developing of Nuclear energy has been doubted. America proclaims that Nuclear energy is high in cost. Hence, speaking of not only maintaining the plants, they will also need to be inspected and made sure that there are no problems. This all cost money, America claims. It cannot be cost efficient if it need such high levels of management. Nuclear energy is not safe for the environment. Since the Fukushima destruction, America says that even though it may be a more reliable source but it creates hazard for the area because of the unknown damages that could partake. After the natural disaster that happened in Japan where three reactors of the Fukushima Daiichi were hit, it caused a meltdown. Therefore, leading to many damages

How each of the accidents was similar to each other was that in each of the accidents the core of the power plant had a meltdown causing a number of problems to occur to the area around it. In the accident of Chernobyl and Fukushima, they both had to have a cover built over the cores so that the radiation that was in the core not leak out. Also, the backup power in both cases did not help keep the power plant to in the emergencies that it had. A short-term effect that was caused by both of the accident was that they were able to manage the power plant cores and stop more radiation from coming out of the cores. The long-term effect is that the radiation that was released after the meltdown will take a long time to be recovered, but the people

Fukushima was the second worst nuclear disaster in the history of the world. Contamination can spread through air, dust, trash, wildlife, and of course water. TEPCO reported that around 300 tons of contaminated water had leaked in to the ocean. By April 15, 2011 radiation levels were 6500 times the legal limit. Cod and pollock are important because of their global demand. Cod has tested positive for radiation contamination more than once since the disaster, not only in the Fukushima area, but in many other areas too. 70% of domestic product comes from the Pacific Ocean. This has led to a lot of negative information circulating through Japanese society and a shortage of positive information (or at least an indifference to it). Negative

Ever since disaster struck Japan on March 11, 2011 Fukushima, Japan is now considered the “world’s radiation nightmare”. The tsunami that hit Fukushima led to the meltdowns of the reactors in the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Complex. Food contamination quickly became a major concern throughout all of Japan and nearby countries. Fish and other major foods for the Japanese contained an undetectable amount of radiation making the food unsafe for the people who depend on it to eat. Along with the food not being safe the value of the food dropped significantly making it hard for the famers of Fukushima to sell their product to the consumers. This disaster was the world’s worst nuclear accident in the past 25 years. The major problem is that after the tsunami happened tons of radioactive water and waste is being leaked into the ocean.

This caused reactors 1 through 3 to go into a meltdown and it created a situation where Japan was on the brink of a major environmental disaster. To fully understand the different events there will be a focus on: factors that caused the meltdown, why this did not impact the other three reactors, the consequences, who is responsible and how these incidents can be prevented in the future. Together, these elements will highlight the underlying effects of this disaster and its impact on the region. ("Fukushima Accident," 2012)

The year following the triple disaster of Fukushima was a year of self-assessment, self-criticism and adjustment. It is a model of governance that has been highly criticized in Japan. Of course, to avoid panic, the Government had decided not to warn people of the risks they could incur, when it became probable, a few days after the disaster, that the heart of the reactors had melted. But the government itself was misinformed, and oversight agencies that it depended on in this area did not have the first-hand information or the expertise that they should have had.

On March 11th, 2011, the northern section of Japan was hit by a 9.0 magnitude earthquake, followed by a 15 meter tsunami, causing the death of over 15000 people. (Spacey) Even though the earthquake and the tsunami caused a tremendous amount of deaths in the northern region of Japan, the meltdown of the Fukushima nuclear power plant caused a severe damage to northern Japan’s ecosystem that people still cannot go back to their homes; despite it is 4 years after the disaster. After the earthquake, the tsunami destroyed the power supply used by Fukushima’s three nuclear power stations, causing severe levels of meltdown to be occurred inside the reactors in the timespan of 3 days. It was not until 2 weeks after the tragedy, when the reactors were finally stabilized, and took several months to approach what is called a “cold shutdown condition”, in which the fission in the reactors are completely stopped.(Fukushima A)

On March 11, 2011, Japan was rattled by a powerful earthquake and tsunami. Thousands of lives were changed forever. As a result, there were countless deaths. Notwithstanding, the earthquake and the tsunami destroyed homes, businesses, and roads. An excessive amount of debris was left behind. The impact of the tsunami, as well as the earthquake, caused a major power outage which, in turn, caused a nuclear meltdown and/or explosion at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. In the wake of the earthquake and the tsunami that followed, there were long-term effects on the environment as well as on the quality of life of the Japanese people. As there is always a chance of a nuclear meltdown and/or

In the early morning hours of 28th March 1979, the worst disaster in the history of nuclear energy production in the US took place. Unit Two of the Three Mile Island had a meltdown releasing some amount of radioactivity into the surrounding area. The meltdown led to the possibility of Unit 2 of the reactor facility to explode. The ramifications of the accident revealed the conceptual difficulties of assessing social risks and the political difficulties in managing them (Nelkin, March 1981).This paper aims at describing the accident, the post-accident setup and clean-up and the various losses which have been attributed to the disaster. It also intends to develop an understanding of the various complex issues and social vulnerabilities and risks that caused the disaster. The paper raises a very important question about the safety of the nuclear power plants in the world and the risk the reactors pose to the people and environment as a whole.