Fundamental Rights in India

Constitution ~ a body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed.

A constitution is the fundamental principles of government in a nation, either implied in its laws, institutions, and customs, or embodied in one fundamental document. The U.S. Constitution was completed on September 17, 1789 and has served as a model for the constitutions of many other nations. The constitution of the United States of America is the oldest written national constitution in use and consists of twenty-seven amendments.

A constitution is the system of fundamental principles according to which a nation is governed. Our founding fathers created the US Constitution to

the founding document of our nation’s laws and government. Within its texts, the Constitution outlines the operations and existence of all three branches of government, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial, as well as their functions and interdependence. The constitution also includes the Bill of Rights, and all other amendments that serve as a basis for any law created in our country at either the federal or state level. While semi-extensive, the main rights we share are those from the bill of rights, which

The Constitution is a set of basic principles and laws that states the power and duties of the government, and is still used today. The Constitution limited the power of the national government and protected the rights of the people

1. A constitution is a charter that both establishes a government and delineates fundamental rights and obligations of that government and of individuals who fall within the territory covered by the constitution. The Constitution of the U.S. provided for a federal union of the states and a federal government divided into three branches (legislative, judicial, and executive) to operate the union. The fundamental rights of the Constitution are known as the Ten Amendments, which make up the Bill of Rights. The Constitution gives the government limited power and describes what they can and cannot do, how to govern the legal system, and give rights to citizens.

The ICRA helped create a conversation about the need for protection of individual rights not only from the federal government, but also tribal councils. This act also facilitated a bigger discussion that Native Americans were going to endure and combat any assimilation policies that the federal government purposed. During the nineteenth century, there was a heavy push by reformers to persuade the federal government to take an even more aggressive approach toward assimilating Native Americans. A prominent policy during the nineteenth century was allotment. At a basic level, allotment attempted to force Native Americans to assimilate. At the very foundation of allotment was the Dawes act which had an underlying assumption that Native Americans wanted to be farmers amongst other jobs that would help compulsorily usher Natives into the larger American society. Francis Prucha, for example, author of the book Americanizing the American Indians, takes a great deal of time in talking about the attitudes towards Indians and federal policy prior to the twentieth century. He relies heavily on the evidences of speeches, articles, and pamphlets written by reformers who worked diligently to sway federal Indian policy to forcibly assimilate Indians. In his book, Prucha submits that reformers had three main goals. The first goal focused on using allotment to break

It may also include a charter of fundamental rights. And fundamental and inalienable and inviolable right. In other words, the constitution guarantees everyone the respect of the rights: it is necessary to guarantee the fundamental rights of citizens. It poses, for example, the principle of the equality of citizens, the universal suffrage ( Voting rights granted to all citizens of age) the source of legitimacy and allows everyone to have his case heard by an independent tribunal. A constitution is an instrument that must fights against arbitrariness by allowing all citizens freedom. Thus violating the freedom of people right is legitimately unacceptable level of government action although politics

What exactly is the Constitution? The Constitution of the United States is the highest set of laws of the United States, which cannot be ignored without severe repercussions. The Constitution was the successor to the Articles of Confederation, which had severely failed at keeping the country together, both politically and economically, so it was abolished. Because of that, the Philadelphia Convention convened with the goal to fix the law. It was finished and signed on September 17, 1787 and it has been used up to this day.

The rights and freedoms that are assured under the Charter are fundamental freedoms, democratic rights, mobility rights, legal rights, language and minority language education rights. Another question that people may ponder is where are the charter or rights and freedoms from? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is parted from the Canadian Constitution. The Charter is the rule of law and is crucial in a free and democratic population that stemmed from the Constitution of Canada of rights and freedoms. One of the most significant developments in the protection of human rights in Canada is the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Charter is known around the world as a model document protecting the rights and freedoms of its citizens. If anyone believes their rights or freedoms to be infringed under any circumstances can go to the court to ask for a

Section 7 as stated by the Charter states that, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice” (Constitution Act, 1982, s 7). Furthermore,

On the other hand, India has spent a majority of its history as a colony of England. It was not until 1947 that India became an independent nation state, after a grassroots nationalist movement started by Gandhi, and even then they were a one party congress. They are also an interesting case of democracy because of how many unfavorable aspects towards it they had, such as high inequality, many peasants, and many different languages and religions (Lecture). In 1956, India was broken up into states by the States Reorganization Act, that made state lines based on linguistic group. India’s founding leaders mirrored the ideas of America, in balancing states rights with a central government (Sil, 2014). They have also more recently gone through a liberalization of their economy. India is unique in the way that their social hierarchy is constructed because of the fact that they have a caste system. The caste system is a combination of religious practice and community organization that is a part of Hinduism (Sil, 2014). This system was officially demolished in the country, but in the country it is still very prevalent, and the focus on helping those who were in lower castes succeed has made people more aware of the way they institute social policies.

Constitution is the basic principles and laws of a nation, state or social groups that determine the powers and duties of the government and guarantee certain rights to the citizen (Merriam-Webster online dictionary, n.d). In other words, it is a set of guidelines for a government to exercise the given power.

Indian Constitution provides us rights, responsibility, and duty. As per our constitution every Indian must uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India. The current rhetoric in India is bit bitter towards our great nation. Few people saying, we need one more partition which will never happen. The free speech is soul of any democracy. There is no question in my mind that anyone has to prove how much you love India. We do not need to handover patriotic certificate to each other. Nobody is superior over each other. We all are equal and we can express our self freely and without being threatened, that’s why we hop on social media. I personally do not take broad brush and paint a picture. I do not put label on people but in the world free speech is also labelled as a freedom to offend people. In the debate one can be on any side and I welcome all opinions. Let me expresses myself, if you ask me personally I will always support valiant Indian army more over absurd and disgraceful anti nationalist who call a terrorist a hero. According to me, the freedom of speech cannot be masked over anti nationalist Klan or anti national annotation. People yell on Indian streets “Bharat ke tukade kar do” under mask of rights but they forget their duty and responsibility. There is egregious violence in Kashmir but we need to put solutions on the table without talking about dividing our nation. Kashmir is an integral part of India. We need feisty leadership in Kashmir who can

The terms “fundamental rights” have not been defined in the Constitution. Article 12 imposes duty on the state to protect citizens for enjoying the Fundamental Rights. Each article has a distinct, important an valuable fundamental right empowering the citizens. These rights primarily aimed at assuring political freedom to the citizens by protecting them against excessive State action. They are given a pride of place in the Constitution by the Drafting Committee.