GMO Controversy Analysis

GM foods are in the middle of many controversial issues; primarily these are addressed by conflicts over the relative pros and cons of GM foods. Major biotech companies like ‘Monsanto ' and ‘Cargill ' are promoting GM foods by focusing only on their beneficial aspects, giving least importance to their negative effects on safety, environment and biodiversity. On the other hand, governmental regulators and nongovernmental organizations, along with some scientists, are strictly opposing this type of blind promotion of GM food by enlightening the people on their negative effects The controversies associated with GM foods include issues such as safety, environmental benefits and risks, biodiversity, and ethical and social considerations.GM foods are implicated for adverse human health risks like people being allergic to it, environmental hazards such as development of super weeds, and pesticide and antibiotic resistance in disease causing organisms. On the other

Genetically Modified Organisms, or GMO’s, are organisms that have had genes from a different organism implanted into their own genetic code in order to produce a new result (“Genetically engineered foods”). This practice has elicited polar responses across the globe, for a multitude of reasons. Besides the obvious reason, being the morality of changing an organism's DNA for human benefit, one frequently noted problem is the monopolization of GMO’s by the company Monsanto, whose name is nearly synonymous with GMO’s due to their involvement with these crops. Monsanto has been at the center of many controversies regarding GMO’s, and is even considered to be ranked third to last for reputation among all major American companies (Bennett). Most

In December 2014, a Harvard professor wrote an article outlining the many benefits of GMOs (genetically modified organisms) and why it is a good idea to use them. This professor is now surrounded by controversy because he failed to note his connection to the largest producer of GM seeds, Monsanto, who not only told him to write the article but also gave him the major points he was to address. Why was this such a huge deal, and why did Monsanto want a pro-GMO article out there so badly? The GMO debate is largely controversial, but largely misunderstood because of the misinformation given by biased writers, such as John Hibma, a nutritionist and author who wrote the article “More Pros Than Cons.” What many people do not realize is that genetic modification is a serious issue and that articles like Hibma’s fail to disclose the truth about the numerous health, crop, and environmental concerns surrounding GMOs.

GMOs continue to be a hot topic of debate. So it makes sense to ask; would climate change accelerate if GMOs were banned in the U.S.?

Genetically modified organisms(GMO) is one of the most important issues around the world. GMOs are Organisms who are altered for product quality and improvement quality. Through the years GMOs have raised concerns on their beneficial attributes such as their resistance to disease, higher product yield, and improved nutrition. These concerns led GMO being worldwide how due to the negative effects GMOs have on health and the environment. However, the U.S. government actively uses GMO and does not understand the consequences of this product. To address this I do not actively support the government use of GMO because, it is linked to sickness of many people,and it severely harms the environment.

A growing debate today is the effect of genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, on our health and the stability of the environment. Emily Anthes, a journalist who mainly writes about current issues in science, posted an article on the New York Times titled “Don 't be Afraid of Genetic Modification”. In the article, Anthes presents a few examples of genetically modified animals that have been considered for consumption and the obstacles that the biotech companies who created them face. Anthes is discussing a very prevalent topic here. GMOs are here to stay, and it is important for people to understand what a GMO actually is.

There is much controversy when discussing the topic of Genetically Modified Organisms. Whether it may concern moral or ethical factors, there always seems to be considerable arguments either defending or arguing against GMOs. Based on research, GMOs prove to be extremely present in our food supply worldwide. Chemical engineering, fertilization, as well as other methods of manufacturing come into question when formulating an opinion on GMOs. Due to the manipulation of biotechnology that effectively yields products like GMOs, the public is not only susceptible to whatever side effects that may come with chemically altered produce but also the mind boggling conscience of consuming food that isn’t necessarily “all natural” or “natural”.

In her book “Going Against GMOs: The Fast-Growing Movement to Avoid Unnatural Genetically Modified Foods”, author Melissa Diane Smith does not hesitate to warn against the use of GMOs, which, in her view, “threaten our environment, food security, and agricultural system”. Most GMO crops are treated with herbicides, which have been found to contaminate both soil and water sources as well as pose health risks once the foods are consumed by humans or animals. To complicate things further, chemical companies, such as Monsanto, Cargill, and DuPont are purchasing vast quantities of the world’s seeds. They modify them genetically and then patent them so they can control food and seed supplies—which means that farmers can no longer collect seeds from their own crops to use in subsequent seasons (Smith 53). If farmers want to stay in business, they must purchase seeds from one of these companies. Many small farmers cannot afford the expense and must seek employment elsewhere.

Genetically Modified Organisms, often called GMOs, are genetically altered organisms generated in a synthetic environment, such as a laboratory, that offers alternative methods for manufacturing foods. Subjected to much debate, GMOs have steadily acquired prejudice stigmatization by the public of America; however, the beneficial and adaptive features of GMOs, including high yields, quality nutritional values, and sustainability, far out way the preconceived risks. GMOs compose over 70 percent of manufactured food products in America, which provides significant relevance towards this controversial topic. GMO’s have gained the support of credible scientific organizations, such as the American Medical Association and the American Association

GMO’s or genetically modified organisms are living organisms such as fruits or vegetables whose genetic material has been artificially manipulated through genetic engineering, this often includes inserting genetic material from another organism of a different species. The use of GMO’s is becoming more and more prevalent in the United States although long-term studies of their effects have yet to be done. The production of GMO’s is dangerous, the modifying traits of a specific plant for consumption for the benefit of production and business is unnatural. Although the use of GMO’s has increased production and lowered costs for some foods, the long-term effects are dangerous to not only the consumer but also the environment. Some have even said that “the environmental and health risks outweigh the benefits” (Beckrich).

Genetically modified organisms, more commonly referred to as GMO’s, are greatly up for debate at this time. A GMO is the result of a laboratory process in which genes are transferred between organisms in order to obtain generally more desirable traits. (“Genetically Modified Organisms”). The process basically takes naturally unobtainable traits, and makes them obtainable through a highly controlled laboratory setting. Large companies produce these GMO’s with great profit, especially due to the great demand for their product, which allows for the production of a higher yield of crops. The advancement of technology has resulted in further development of the way genetic modification occurs. (“GMO FAQs”)

Humans no longer simply select from variations present in the population: they create new variations!

By definition, genetically modified organisms or GMO’s are those whose genome has been genetically engineered in a laboratory in order to favor the expression of desired physiological traits or the production of desired biological products. GMOs have a very long history, being around for over 30,000 years. However, they’ve only become a hot topic in the past decade. In fact “The relative number of Google searches for “GMO” has more than tripled since late 2012” ( “A Brief Look”). This statement by a Harvard article depicts the public’s increasing awareness and understanding behind the concept of GMO’s.

Society is exceedingly worked up on the new hype: genetically modified organisms. This topic is one of the most intensely debated issues, mainly because many are becoming more aware of both the positive and negative aspects associated with them. While there are opposing viewpoints regarding GMO’s, there is valid reasoning that both supports and opposes organisms whose material is altered.

First, what is a GMO? A GMO is the physical adding or altering of the genetic material of an organism, plant, or animal (Bushak, 2015). The modification of the DNA’s structure has an intended result of adding beneficial traits or control over the structure. Using scientific methods which include reproductive cloning and recombinant DNA technology, starts the controversy centered around consuming products that have been modified, which could potentially impact health (GMO,2017). However, a broad census among scientists reports that GMO’s do not produce any more of a risk than conventional foods. Therefore, the focus needs to be on how GMO’s impact long-term sustainable advantages for a growing world population, while establishing safety measures to check and balance for potential risks.