GS- Goldman Sachs

Prior to the financial crisis, the overall responsibility for financial oversight was divided among several different agencies. These agencies and their “varying rules and standards led to certain entities not being regulated at all, with others subject to less oversight than their peer

Goldman Sachs & Co is a company in the financial sector, asset management industry and sub-industry in investment management. It operates as an investment firm and offers a variety of financial service such as investment advisory and portfolio management service to mutual and pension funds, foundations and individuals.

There are various categories of banking; these include retail banking, directly dealing with small businesses and persons. Commercial and Corporate banking which offers services to medium and large businesses (Koch & MacDonald 2010). Private banking, deals with individuals, offering them one on one service. The last category is investment banking. These help clients to raise capital and often invest in financial markets. Most global banking institutions provide all these services combined. With all these institutions in existence within the same localities and offering similar services, there is a need to regulate the industry so as to protect the consumer and provide fair working environment for all banks (Du & Girma, 2011).

Now, many of these banking groups are owned by foreign investors, despite attempted safeguards. This ownership has provided investors leverage and influence over the actions of the government because the government owes an exorbitant amount to these banks (Daniel Lederman). The same argument can be made about the United States’ government. This influence can be seen across the board as many decisions now seem to favor only a select few, forgetting about the ramifications for the many.

Morrison suggests that government should try to make regulations that can make TBTF policy effective rather than, try to end the policy, which is impossible. Morrison discusses the role of the policy in designing suitable capital regulations, in the restriction of bank scope and in institutional design. The author argues that financial institutions receive help from taxpayers and government because regulatory authorities believe that its failure would have severe effects on the country’s economy.

In 2008, when the financial crisis occurred, millions of Americans were left without jobs and trillions of dollars of wealth was lost wealth. To make sure the Great Recession would not happen again, President Barrack Obama put into effect the Dodd- Frank Act. With the help of this law, banks will not be able to take irresponsible risks that had negative effects on the American people. Furthermore, with the Volcker Rule embedded into the act, it will ensure that banks are no longer allowed to own, invest, or sponsor hedge funds, private equity funds, or proprietary trading operations for their own profit, unrelated to serving their

Which of the following measures the difference between the private costs of regulations and the private benefits for the producers of financial services? a. Capital adequacy b. Agency costs c. Net regulatory burden d. Charter value e. Liquidity risk FIs are special because a. their failure can impose negative externalities on the economy. b. they receive special

The government regulation of the financial industry by the Dodd-Frank Act was the most compelling topic of this class. A financial regulatory process was created which limits risk through the enforcement of transparency and accountability. The main objective of the Dodd-Frank Act was to provide regulation to banks that was more stringent. The FSOC was created as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act. The two main objectives of the FSCO was to stop the occurrence of another recession and to resolve persistent issues. The elimination of bailouts funded by taxpayers was another important element of this act. The CFPB also known as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created as a result of the act. The consolidation of consumer protection responsibilities

Since 1933, the United States government has provided varying degrees of regulation designed to protect the average banking customer from the risks of investment banking. The Glass-Steagall Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, and the Volcker Rule were implemented to try to keep banks from investing consumer deposits into riskier securities but deregulation and lobbying have created instability.

By allowing banks to become “too big to fail”, the failure of one leads to massive repercussions for the entire economy. In a contrasting environment where many small institutions exist, the implosion of one bank will not have this far-reaching, catastrophic impact. In recent years, reforms have taken place that limit a company’s ability to be “too big to fail”. In the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2008, measures to revitalize the financial system included the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protect Act of 2010, named after U.S Senator Christopher J. Dodd and U.S Representative Barney Frank. The Act aimed to increase regulation and transparency in an industry that had so clearly lacked them and minimize future risk in the

Regulations such as the Insider Trading Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, and Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) enhance protection and eradicate unethical business practices. Despite the various laws in place to protect individuals, just turn on the news, read the paper, or glance online at the numerous corporate scandals. Enactment of legislation such as SOX and the Dodd-Frank Act endeavored to restore the public’s trust. Do these rules mitigate the risk, or are they burdensome on broker-dealer such as Group Capital? While laws exist to protect consumers, investors, and shareholders, the question remains are they excessive. The sustainability and ramifications of financial regulation receive minimal thought, and the possibility of future crises garners even less consideration. Kaal (2013) indicated a sense of urgency around rule-making, yet it may not allow a full evaluation of the effect on a broker-dealer. Many of these decisions consider the economic, political, and legal costs on society and not the impact on businesses. Regulators need to balance consumer protection without being punitive towards the financial industry. These factors need balance, or they could stifle business

Government departments are instrumental to a flourishing and secure economy. They are in place to serve their constituents and ought to keep that in mind. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) fits this well and is in place to ensure that bank users are protected in instances of economic downturn and that their money is insured. In this way, regulation is extremely necessary to ensure a stable economy in instances of financial instability. To completely understand the FDIC, it is important to understand why and how it was created, its history, major responsibilities and who the leaders are.

The investment banks, and subsequent stock brokerage firms, was regulated by the Security and Exchange Commission. The banking entities, in this portion of the financial sector, were used to dealing in high risk business that were structured on the business’ equity and debt capital, instead of the commercial banks’ deposits of customers. The activities in this sector of the financial system were underwriting stocks and bonds, insurance markets, the investments in subprime debt markets and mortgages.

The goal of financial regulation is to increase efficiency in the market, as well as enhance the market 's ability to absorb shock caused by financial instability. There are many reasons for financial instability, but it can be narrowed down to

At the same time, the regulators should be as transparent as possible and fully accountable. The accountability and transparency of the regulator will increase the credibility of the regulator and in-turn benefit the regulated entity. Types of Financial Regulation Financial regulation in a country can be done either by a single body called a single regulator or multiple bodies co-existing and working together or in a hierarchy of entities known as multiple regulators. A regulator whether single or multiple does not determine the economic standing of a country or its financial strength. Many developed countries of the world follow either the system of single regulation or multiple regulations. Often in times of economic crisis or financial boom in the country’s economy the government of the nation will review its regulatory system and choose to expand or close down some of its regulatory bodies.