Galileo And Pope John Paul 2 Summary

There will always be a battle between religion and science, it is a truth universally acknowledged. Galileo attempted to make the two compatible by suggesting that the truth can only be sought out if the notion under consideration can be accurately tested and if the opposing view can be founded as false. Galileo’s goes into depth about the truth of scripture and the sciences, intertwined with the reason of man, in his letter to Christina of Lorraine, Grand Duchess of

In 1633 the Vatican put a famous astronomer under house arrest. His name was Galileo Galeli, and he was one of the most talented scientists to ever walk the face of the earth. Galileo was an early pioneer in the field of physics and astronomy, and played an important role in the scientific revolution of the 17th century.

In this paper, I will discuss how three influential scholars in this order: Augustine, Aquinas, Galileo, delimit science or the bible and the ways their beliefs overlapped or didn’t.

During the Scientific Revolution, in the 17th century, several philosophers began to doubt scientific knowledge of the Holy Scriptures. One of those philosophers, Galileo, discovered a new innovation that could have changed the viewpoint on the Church’s Scripture accuracy. Galileo discovered that the sun stayed still as the Earth revolved around it, which was the opposite of what the Church taught. During this time, it was very dangerous for Galileo to oppose the Church. This was because doubts about the Church would lead to a loss of its power and the people’s trust, which was unwanted.

Furthermore, in discussing the conflict between the Church and scientists such as Galileo, it must be noted that both parties held themselves to be unquestionably correct in the argument, because they both based themselves in what they believed to be irrefutable truth. The Church viewed the holy

When dwelling into the explorations about science and religion, one can find it quite amusing. "If science and religion are to continue to coexist it seems opposed to the conditions of modern thought to admit that this result can be brought about by the so-called

Well, it is really hard to our selves in the same situation as Galileo was in. First of all, we cannot even imagine, in today’s world of democracy, how it would be to be afraid to express your thoughts and ideas espiecially that the Earth is not flat! Sounds really apsurd if you think about it. If I knew that prior to me several people were killed because of this crazy idea and thought I would probably step away from it as well. On the other hand, I have never been that obsesed and intriged by anything to give my life away for it (family doesn’t count). Most likeliy, I would just leave a writing about it and try to spread it out that way so that there isn’t a straight link to me and my work. Galileo probably recanted because he was afraid of Chruch and what could happen to him. Back in those days Church wasn’t anything similar to what we are used to

Galileo's condemnation held by the Roman Catholic Church has been regarded as wrong, 350 years after he was charged with heresy. The many years it has taken for the Church to recognize its wrongdoing may have been due to the Church's resistance to admit their misdeed and their need to stand firm on recognizing past beliefs and practices. This unique apology sparsely occurs, with "The Vatican's formal acknowledgement of error...is a rarity in an institution built over centuries on the belief that the Church is the final arbiter in matters of faith," (Cowell 1). After years of contemplating whether or not to publicly announce the rightness of Galileo, the Vatican may have wanted to finally apologize on behalf of the Church to set it straight

Galileo was born into a continent wracked by cultural ferment and religious divisions. In the late of 1500s, he saw the last years of the Italian Renaissance, which is a revival of arts and letters that sought the recovery and reworking of classical art and philosophy from ancient Greece and Rome. And on the 15th and 16th centuries, the Renaissance Italy was a center of artistic and intellectual ferment, a home for the great geniuses of the revived humanistic spirit Machiavelli, Da Vinci, Petrarch, Michelangelo, and many more. But the popes also enjoying the peak of their influence, not just the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church during these years, the popes do served as secular leaders as well, and controlling much of central Italy around

Galileo was accused twice of heresy by the church for his beliefs. He remained under house arrest the remaining years of his life.

Religion and science are frequently thought of as opposing ideologies. Each individual that believes that religion and science are conflicting can have their unique reason for why they think this is true. This belief may stem from various areas for each individual. A common point that is made is how Pope Urban VII condemned Galileo Galilei. Pope Urban VII's actions have deeply affected the relationship between religion and science.

In the history of the Catholic Church, no episode is so contested by so many viewpoints as the condemnation of Galileo. The Galileo case, for many, proves the Church abhors science, refuses to abandon outdated teachings, and is clearly not infallible. For staunch Catholics the episode is often a source of embarrassment and frustration. Either way it is undeniable that Galileo’s life sparked a definite change in scientific thought all across Europe and symbolised the struggle between science and the Catholic Church.

In the Trial of Galileo, The Roman Catholic church is the largest christian church in the Western civilization .The moral aspect concerns salvation. The Catholic Church was directed by the Holy Scripture by the Church Fathers, which provided the means of eternal salvation: those don 't renounce the Catholic Church of Catholicism place their souls in peril. Protestantism was an enemy Galileo had encountered but it derives the Catholic Church of converts because it deprives people from the true ideal of salvation amongst early catholic people. But in some situations got difficult for Galileo to handle more than one role played. The Galileo case for many anti catholics, is to be proven that church abhors science, refuse to abandon outdated teachings. The Church was not anti-scientific but it supported scientific endeavors for centuries. The Jesuits were a respected group of astronomers and scientist in Rome during Galileo 's time. Individuals and church officials and from the church, were many notable scientist who received fundings. During this time period Church funding from many scientific advances were contributed by clerics. Therefore if Galileo had not been prosecuted with the political controversy of the Catholic Church, he would have lived a longer life contributing more towards his theories and inventions as a scientist than his religious obedience.

Religion and science have always been conflicting studies. Religion, being based on faith, relies on the supernatural to explain life and being. Science, on the other hand, cannot do this. Scientists need to eliminate the possibility of the unexplainable in order to maintain and control group by which to measure other groups. The unexplainable I refer to are the miracles that are commonplace in all supernatural religions. Galileo lived in a time where church was state. The land was ruled according to the words of the bible, and anyone in opposition would be in contempt. Galileo's scientific findings were therefore strongly shunned by the church. In 1615 Galileo attempted to explain how these findings came to be

As Barberini, now robed as POPE URBAN VIII, the Inquisitor insists that Galileo’s mathematical charts should be destroyed, warning that if the people start to doubt the Vatican, it won’t be long before they doubt the Gospel.