Galileo's Argument Analysis

In 1633 the Vatican put a famous astronomer under house arrest. His name was Galileo Galeli, and he was one of the most talented scientists to ever walk the face of the earth. Galileo was an early pioneer in the field of physics and astronomy, and played an important role in the scientific revolution of the 17th century.

In science, theories of some scientists like Galileo and Copernicus were refused and punished because they were opposite the belief of the Catholic

There were many who cited portions of scripture such as Joshua 10:13, which states “So the Sun stood still in the midst of heaven” (Joshua 10:13), and Isaiah 40:22, which states “he that stretcheth out the heavens as nothing, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in.” (Isaiah 40:22), as pieces of holy evidence to refute and definitely disprove the heliocentric theory as truth. However, Galileo could not easily be written off as a rambling, heretical madman either, seeing as his theories were first proposed by Nicolaus Copernicus, who was “not only a Catholic, but a priest and a canon.” (Galileo, Letter to Christina, 2) Even if Galileo was not a respected member of the Church, Copernicus was, and if his theories had originally been proposed by a Catholic canon, then it was harder to dismiss his ideas as heretical. Additionally, Galileo himself frequently offered to present others with evidence of the truth of his theories, stating “to the leading philosophers of the faculty here…I have offered a thousand times of my own accord to show my studies…” (Galileo, Letter to Kepler).

Well, it is really hard to our selves in the same situation as Galileo was in. First of all, we cannot even imagine, in today’s world of democracy, how it would be to be afraid to express your thoughts and ideas espiecially that the Earth is not flat! Sounds really apsurd if you think about it. If I knew that prior to me several people were killed because of this crazy idea and thought I would probably step away from it as well. On the other hand, I have never been that obsesed and intriged by anything to give my life away for it (family doesn’t count). Most likeliy, I would just leave a writing about it and try to spread it out that way so that there isn’t a straight link to me and my work. Galileo probably recanted because he was afraid of Chruch and what could happen to him. Back in those days Church wasn’t anything similar to what we are used to

Copernicus theory was so controversial that the Catholic Church forbid

Galileo was born into a continent wracked by cultural ferment and religious divisions. In the late of 1500s, he saw the last years of the Italian Renaissance, which is a revival of arts and letters that sought the recovery and reworking of classical art and philosophy from ancient Greece and Rome. And on the 15th and 16th centuries, the Renaissance Italy was a center of artistic and intellectual ferment, a home for the great geniuses of the revived humanistic spirit Machiavelli, Da Vinci, Petrarch, Michelangelo, and many more. But the popes also enjoying the peak of their influence, not just the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church during these years, the popes do served as secular leaders as well, and controlling much of central Italy around

He agreeing that his ideas of copernicus was false by putting himself in not sticking up for his ideas and his beliefs. The church leaders were clearly wrong to condemn him but they acted a good faith. It was not a simple conflict between science and religion, as usually portrayed. Rather it was a conflict between copernican science and Aristotelian science which had become church tradition.

In the early seventeenth century there was a conflict between a young scientist named Galileo Galilei and the Roman Catholic Church. Knowing the cost heresy, Galileo stood up for what he could prove. Taking a stance with a universe that one could observe, was greater to Galileo than to take a stance with the souls of men which no man can observe.

Many people in the past believed in traditional teachings. One of the examples is religions. In the past, people’s belief was taught from generations to generations. Many looked in the past for examples to create something new. Many thought that the traditional teachings they were taught were always right. For example, “The physical elements, according to Aristotle moved vertically, depending on their ‘heaviness’ or ‘gravity’; the celestial bodies were not physical but a ‘fifth element’ or ‘quintessence’ whose nature was to move in perfect circles around the earth, making a daily rotation.” This observation was not right. “The earth was not the true center of the orbits and the motion was not uniform.” Although people believed in traditional

The most important event that resulted from the Galileo Affair was the information and data that caused the paradigm shift from the Geocentric approach to the Heliocentric approach. Francis Collins states that all faiths today (except for a few primitive ones) except the Heliocentric layout of the Universe. Both realms of science and religion agree and believe on the same paradigm. A scientific revelation occurred, and Thomas Kuhn would say a paradigm shift did occur. No longer is Earth the center of the

The information condensed in this quote demonstrates the autonomous nature of all human beings. Strenuous obstacles hinder everyone from achieving whatever they desire, which can range from everyday obstacles such as a coffee maker not functioning properly to excruciating impalements like a person deleting the final prototype design on the deadline day. When humans encounter these challenges, the sole way to resolve and gain knowledge from that experience is to kinesthetic maneuver one’s way through the complication, the implications that Galileo Galilei exerted in his statement. Individuals learn nothing if they do not unearth the alternative themselves; another person rambling instructions, a video blaring instructions, and a didactic book showing

In summer of 1609, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) pointed his revolutionary astronomical telescope to the heavens under the starry Venetian sky; his greatly important observations unveiled the mysteries of universe and would end up changing the course of scientific thought forever. Galileo lived in an age where there was much status quo, when scientists and philosophers would accept scientific and religious doctrine that had stood for hundreds, if not thousands, of years instead of challenging the accepted knowledge in favor of intellectual progress. Galileo’s scientific methods lead to significant discoveries explaining key scientific laws, such as the

“When Galileo was under house arrest, he wrote Two New Sciences.” It’s about his life’s work on the science of motion and strength of materials. In his book, Galileo talks about the resistance of bodies’ separation in day one. It talks about Aristotle and his theory on motion. Aristotelian physics argued that the Earth must not move as humans are unable to perceive the effects of this motion. On the other hand, it includes Galileo’s procedures of his experiment on motion. The second day, it talks about the cause of cohesion. There’s information about how animals have to have large bones to be able to carry their own weight. In the section, He proves that the optimum shape for a beam supported at one end and bearing a load at the other is parabolic.

Some of the new scientific discoveries consisted of theories which went against the churches beliefs. One theory which was proven true about

Unfortunately, I have not seen Brecht's Galileo in a theatre. However, I have read the play and like it very much. The author did not make his aim to show us a documentary narration about Galileo's life. He prefers meaningful drama to historical truth; therefore, he does not take into consideration or even change some historical facts about Galileo's life. The author wants to portray Galileo as a great but ordinary man, who can have his strong and weak sides. So, Bertold Bretch does not make the principal character of the play either a hero or betrayer. His Galileo is somewhere in the middle.