Galileo's Argument Analysis

In 1633 the Vatican put a famous astronomer under house arrest. His name was Galileo Galeli, and he was one of the most talented scientists to ever walk the face of the earth. Galileo was an early pioneer in the field of physics and astronomy, and played an important role in the scientific revolution of the 17th century.

By thinking for his individual self, he managed to recreate electricity and discovers the light bulb. He then went through a long term and finally got the chance to share his findings with the Home of the Scholars, and they rejected it. With this example, the author tries to suggest that being self-reliant and thinking for oneself can lead to scientific progress, something that this society does not do. She also implies that thinking individually can lead to higher things rather than being a part of dictatorial world and adhere to

For most people of the modern age, a clear distinction exists between the truth as professed by religious belief, and the truth as professed by scientific observation. While there are many people who are able to hold scientific as well as religious views, they tend to hold one or the other as being supreme. Therefore, a religious person may ascribe themselves to certain scientific theories, but they will always fall back on their religious teachings when they seek the ultimate truth, and vice versa for a person with a strong trust in the sciences. For most of the early history of humans, religion and science mingled freely with one another, and at times even lent evidence to support each other as being true. However, this all changed

Well, it is really hard to our selves in the same situation as Galileo was in. First of all, we cannot even imagine, in today’s world of democracy, how it would be to be afraid to express your thoughts and ideas espiecially that the Earth is not flat! Sounds really apsurd if you think about it. If I knew that prior to me several people were killed because of this crazy idea and thought I would probably step away from it as well. On the other hand, I have never been that obsesed and intriged by anything to give my life away for it (family doesn’t count). Most likeliy, I would just leave a writing about it and try to spread it out that way so that there isn’t a straight link to me and my work. Galileo probably recanted because he was afraid of Chruch and what could happen to him. Back in those days Church wasn’t anything similar to what we are used to

Galileo's condemnation held by the Roman Catholic Church has been regarded as wrong, 350 years after he was charged with heresy. The many years it has taken for the Church to recognize its wrongdoing may have been due to the Church's resistance to admit their misdeed and their need to stand firm on recognizing past beliefs and practices. This unique apology sparsely occurs, with "The Vatican's formal acknowledgement of error...is a rarity in an institution built over centuries on the belief that the Church is the final arbiter in matters of faith," (Cowell 1). After years of contemplating whether or not to publicly announce the rightness of Galileo, the Vatican may have wanted to finally apologize on behalf of the Church to set it straight

Galileo was born into a continent wracked by cultural ferment and religious divisions. In the late of 1500s, he saw the last years of the Italian Renaissance, which is a revival of arts and letters that sought the recovery and reworking of classical art and philosophy from ancient Greece and Rome. And on the 15th and 16th centuries, the Renaissance Italy was a center of artistic and intellectual ferment, a home for the great geniuses of the revived humanistic spirit Machiavelli, Da Vinci, Petrarch, Michelangelo, and many more. But the popes also enjoying the peak of their influence, not just the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church during these years, the popes do served as secular leaders as well, and controlling much of central Italy around

What are his attitudes toward those who he feels are using the bible to support arguments against him?

Galileo was a coward Galileo was an Italian natural philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician, who made fundamental contributions to the sciences of motion, astronomy and strength of materials and to the development of the scientific method. His discoveries with the telescope changed astronomy and paved the way for the acceptance of the copernican Heliocentric system. Galileo, using his own telescope he discovered that the moon has mountains and creators. Galileo found a new position at the university of Padua, teaching geometry, mechanics, and astronomy.

The church wrongfully branded Galileo as a heretic. His contradictory scientific discoveries challenged the doctrine of the church, but was simply a different interpretation of the Bible. In his letter to the Grand Duchess Christina of Tuscany in 1615, Galileo presented strong arguments on why he wasn’t a heretic. “Hence in expounding the Bible if one were always to confine oneself to the unadorned grammatical meaning, one might fall into error.” Galileo argues that simply taking the Bible at face value, and not reading in between the lines, may cause one to misinterpret the meaning of the text.

In late 1632, after writing Dialogues on the Two Chief World Systems, Galileo was dictated to go to Rome to be investigated by the Holy Office of the Inquisition. In January 1633, a particularly unhealthy Galileo executed an strenuous travel to Rome. There has been much dispute over the circumstances influencing Galileo’s ordeal. There is also contention over the legitimacy of the statements against Galileo, both in terms of their content and judicial procedure. Specifically, he had been encumbered with educating and advocating the Copernican dogma that believes that the Sun is at the center of the cosmos and that the earth

Galileo was accused twice of heresy by the church for his beliefs. He remained under house arrest the remaining years of his life.

for people to accept. But when the actual facts are looked at it is very easy

What’s important to recall about this time is that the protestant reformation had just occurred which encouraged men to stop looking to religious leaders as a source of reliable knowledge, but to instead read and interpret “God’s words” for themselves. Docta pietas is learned piety originating from the idea of Christian humanism. This goes back to the original source of knowledge of the church; the religious leaders who interpreted and taught were no longer as reliable sources of knowledge as they used to be.

In summer of 1609, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) pointed his revolutionary astronomical telescope to the heavens under the starry Venetian sky; his greatly important observations unveiled the mysteries of universe and would end up changing the course of scientific thought forever. Galileo lived in an age where there was much status quo, when scientists and philosophers would accept scientific and religious doctrine that had stood for hundreds, if not thousands, of years instead of challenging the accepted knowledge in favor of intellectual progress. Galileo’s scientific methods lead to significant discoveries explaining key scientific laws, such as the

Through the examples of Oedipus and Socrates, the saying “the unexamined life is not worth living” proves true in three ways: first, to live a life full of discovery is a direct calling from God; second, an examined life leads to humbleness; and lastly, a life spent in investigation will constantly be in pursuit of truth.