Gandhi's Vision and Life in Attenborough's Films

In 1757, Great Britain extended its empire into India. This occupation would not fully end until 1947. In the time between, there were many movements by the Indian people to gain independence from the British. The movement that finally succeeded in winning India’s independence was led by one of the most influential figures of the 20th century, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi’s methods for fighting against the occupation of the British were very different from those of any of the freedom movements before. And that was why it worked. Gandhi did not agree with the general reasoning of the time: that conflicts could be solved through negotiation and forceful resistance.1 Rather, his faith led him to go

Inspired by Mohandas K. Gandhi’s philosophy of Satyagraha during his strive for freedom from government control, Attenborough depicts this in his film. During Gandhi’s first non-violent protest in South Africa, the cross-cutting between Gandhi burning legal documents outlining the rules of the Indians and the English policemen restraining Gandhi signifies the competing political perspectives that exist on the freedom and rights that should be given to Indians. Attenborough emphasises the concept of Satyagraha through Gandhi’s patience and non-violent rebuttal regardless of the Englishmen beating him. Similarly, following the Amritsar massacre, Gandhi reiterates his idea of fighting for the freedom of his nation as he claims people would prefer ‘their own bad government to the good government of an alien power’ which contradicts to the perspective of the British rulers who feel chaos would ensure if that was to occur. Attenborough motto in the film of “peaceful, non-violent, non-co-operation” highlights Gandhi’s motivation to give his people independence. Gandhi makes a statement on non-violent protests through the symbolic salt march scene where the panning of Gandhi marching

The Indians were starting to feel as if their country wasn't theirs anymore. Poor farmers and other hard-working would work all day long just for the british who were forcing them to do so.Whenever someone would raise their voice they would end up in jail. Indians would start to wonder why they were so civilized by another nation. For some time the only power british had to keep the Indians quite was to start putting people in jail.some would be afraid of that and some would not even speak, But Gandhi wasn't one of them, he didn't want to stay quiet and watch them rule India.One of the examples was when Gandhi wanted to repeal the taxes,the salt march in particular, he was a very brave to speak up but once again he was sent to jail. Indians didn't think it was such a great Idea to send someone to jail without any official court orders. They would rally outside jails and finally the British signed an agreement to repeal some taxes. The British would have a sudden fear that if they still rallied outside the jail they would probably have to do even more of repealing taxes. But I am pretty sure it wasn't the last time Gandhi was sent to

According to the Constitutional Rights Foundation, when the Boer legislature passed a law requiring that all Indians have to register with police with fingerprints Gandhi and other Indians had refused to obey the law. For the disobedience, Gandhi was arrested and imprisoned for years because he did not believe in those unjust laws. Though, after he got released, he still continued to protest the registration law and help non-violent marches. Eventually, this caused the Boer government to end the “objectionable parts” of the law. Even though Gandhi had been in jail for an abundance amount of times, he came out every time to start new peaceful protests. At the end, with the help of Gandhi and his satyagraha (peaceful revolt), India had finally gained independence from Britain. Consequently, this again demonstrates how civil disobedience can have positive impact and can change a society for its greater

Indian civil rights leader, Mahatma Gandhi gave a speech on August 8, 1942 that would greatly impact the people of India. Throughout his lifetime, Gandhi was leading the people of India through a resistance movement against British rule. His speech, “Quit India,” captured his thoughts on how Indians could better their lives through a non-violent but determined resistance to break free from English rule. Gandhi’s purpose was to promote a peaceful way to gain independence for India and bring together the people of India. He used unifying, peaceful, and motivating tones to promote a sense of peace in their fight for freedom.

Few names go down in history untarnished. Regardless of religious belief or standard of living, the purity of Mohandas K. Gandhi cannot be denied. In his work gaining rights for indentured slaves, spreading non-violence, gaining independence from Britain, and developing unity between Hindus and Muslims, he never failed to prove the strength of his morals. His legacy could not have proceeded if it weren’t for his patience in spreading the message of remaining humble, specifically through his writings. Throughout his autobiography, “The Story of My Experiments with Truth,” Gandhi appeals to the readers’ pathos and carries across his message of maintaining humility through admitting his mistakes, never blaming others, and giving all credit to God. Without creating such a pristine character for himself, he never would have gain such a wide following.

Once again, he wanted to show to his friends, comrades and all India that they needed to free there self from the cast segregation, and have a respect for all humans at the same time they were searching from freedom. He taught them that no job or task, therefore man was less important that another, and dignity is not related to money or status.

In a real sense, Mahatma Gandhi embodied in his life certain universal principles that are inherent in the moral structure of the universe. These principles are as inescapable as the law of gravitation”. Thus, the relevance of nonviolent resistance in violent situations weakens the aggressor and emboldens the oppressed. This was highlighted in Gandhi’s nonviolent independent movement and King’s peaceful civil right movements in the United States. The bottom line is that, the British possessed enormous military, economic and political power to trash any local resistance in Indian decisively and quickly. Victory for the British in the India subcontinent during the independence struggle would be certain, taking the asymmetrical relations between the British and Gandhi’s civil resistance movements. The same circumstances apply to Martin Luther King’s nonviolent civil movements. As Gandhi’s programs made perorations within the English policies in India, so do United States policies towards its black population also expose them to international public

Violence and war has been used throughout the existence of mankind to assert dominance, gain wealth, or to maintain one’s gained power. Mahatma Gandhi was an Indian man who fought for justice and equality in India by leading protests through peaceful means. He also openly advocated against the British’s rule in India. What made Gandhi so powerful was that he fought his adversaries using the unique technique of nonviolence. Nonviolence introduces the idea of “cowardice vs true strength” many leaders face today. Gandhi focused on these ideals mainly because of his early childhood and teachings from his mother. Gandhi was an influential

Mahatma Gandhi was an anti-war activist who helped lead India against British rule in the early 1900s. Gandhi’s techniques were unique, however, because he used nonviolent protest to get the attention of the British and to hopefully succeed in getting rid of the British Raj in India. As Gandhi grew older and saw more of the things he did in South Africa and in India, he developed beliefs that can be discussed with the Transcendentalist Movement and the key beliefs that a typical transcendentalist has. Through the years of the Transcendentalist Movement and Gandhi’s fight for India’s independence, both of these aspects are different in how they view spirituality, but similarities are found in individualism.

Gandhi one day was ejected from a south african train motivating him to fight for India’s independence. “(Motivation Analysis on Gandhi”). Gandhi has been arrested several times for refusing to carry an obligatory id in South Africa for every time gandhi was being detained he would never show any act of violence, but an act of kindness. Police officers would usually react with some sign of violence for example they would push him and even hit him with a nightstick. This motivated gandhi even more to reach for his primary goal which was to free India’s independence.(Britannica). Gandhi always believed in his abilities, he believed that,”failure is never an option.”. “Gandhi showed tremendously high performance in relation to the goals he set.”Gandhi was faced with the most challenging task of his time. Yet, he never expected failure.(Smith

Gandhi, a wise and pacifist leader, dedicated his life to promote racial equality because he experience first-hand racial discrimination. Gandhi, a wise leader, experienced first-hand racial discrimination, in which he dedicated his life to promote racial equality through pacifist means. Gandhi’s first major encounter with racial discrimination was when he bought a first-class ticket on a train and was later asked to be removed from the first-class section. Gandhi refused to move to the back and was eventually thrown off. Afterwards he made the commitment to himself that he would fight the “deep disease of color prejudice” (“Mahatma Gandhi”). Britain ruled over India at this time, and non-white people were discriminated. Gandhi’s ethnicity was Indian, and therefore officials cast him off the train. Instead of using violence to fight colored prejudice, “Gandhi developed his philosophy of ‘Satyagraha’, or resistance through non-violent civil disobedience” (“‘Satyagraha’: Gandhi’s Legacy”). Gandhi used Satyagraha because he did not believe that violence was the right way to fight. He believed that without peace, no government can exist. An example of how Gandhi used Satyagraha was when Britain passed the British Salt Act in India: an act that “prohibited Indians from collecting or selling salt...and imposed a heavy tax that hit the country’s poorest particularly hard…” (“Mahatma Gandhi”). The Indians were infuriated by its passing. In response to this act Gandhi gathered more than 60,000 Indians and marched 240 miles to the Arabian Sea to get salt instead of buying it (“Mahatma Gandhi”). Even though Gandhi was arrested for breaking the law, other people took

In his essay on Mohandas Gandhi, George Orwell, a British journalist living in India during colonial rule, criticizes Gandhi for compromising his humanity to achieve sainthood. By conceding Gandhi’s statements and remaining indirect, Orwell presents his own opinions while remaining respectful and humble.

During the period of British colonies in India, Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948) led his community to protest against its harsh policies. Gandhi played an important role as a political figure and primarily as a social reformer in political movements. The Father of the Nation established and employed his philosophy including satyagraha, swaraj, and ashima in Indian nonviolent civil disobedience. In this period, Gandhi’s decision to be celibate and to adopt Bramacharya was consistent with his political philosophy.

Gandhi was a human rights activist who enacted change by peacefully protesting racial discrimination. In the article Satyagraha: Gandhi’s Legacy it says, “Gandhi developed his philosophy of ‘Satyagraha’, or resistance through non-violent civil disobedience to defend his rights and the rights of all Indians and non-whites.” Gandhi was so devoted to gaining and defending rights for his people, he dedicated his life to protesting peacefully for their rights. The article also says that although Gandhi had many goals including: protesting unfair taxes and oppressive discrimination, alleviating poverty, helping in the women’s liberation movement, and ending discrimination between social classes in India, his main goal was to help the Indian people gain independence from Great Britain. To