Essay about Gang Injunctions

Gangs and Injunctions Criminal activities and gangs have mostly always been an on going problem in the United States. Gangs and gang members are frequently involved with a variety of different crimes. The 2008 National Youth Gang Survey reported that there are approximately 774,000 active gang members in the United States (Egley, Howell, & Moore, 2010). The 2008 National Youth Gang Survey also states that there are about 27,900 active gangs in the United States (Egley et al., 2010). The active

Criminal activities and gangs have been a continuous problem in California. Focusing on what helps society and the community become a safer environment has lead to civil gang injunctions. Keeping society safe is a responsibility for the local police departments. A civil gang injunction is a court order that prohibits a specific criminal street gang from engaging in various activities such as: fighting, trespassing, intimidation, association with the gang members and graffiti. CGI’s are a public nuisance

This week’s reading was a chapter from the book Police, Power, and the Product of Racial Boundaries by Ana Muniz analyzed the function and outcomes of gang injunctions, specifically the Glendale Corridor Gang Injunction. From what I understood, gang injunctions were used as a modern peculiar institution that reestablished the definition of race and normalized forms of racial inequality to fit their societal needs. Society’s wishes to gentrify lead to the displacement of certain people of color and

Drafting Note to RECITALS (a) Confidentiality agreements typically do not describe the contemplated transaction in detail to avoid the implication that the parties have come to any agreement on the terms of the transaction. Nonetheless, the definition of “Transaction” should be drafted carefully to prevent potential misuse by the Receiving Party of the Disclosing Party’s information. For instance, the Receiving Party may abandon negotiations and launch a hostile bid for the Disclosing Party using

1. Court Injuction 2. Laissez-faire Recording to the Union County College “Laissez- faire an economic and political doctrine that holds that economies function most efficiently when unencumbered by government regulation. Laissez faire advocates favor individual self-interest and competition, and oppose the taxation and regulation of commerce.” “"Leave it alone” The concept came from the economic theories of Adam Smith, the 18th-century Scot whose writings greatly influenced the growth of American

TO: Supervisor FROM: Andrew ToussaintDATE: January 27, 2016RE: Applicability of Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale, LLC vs. Lawson MEMO INTRODUCTION Jennifer Lawson, who was rightfully terminated during Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale’s downsizing effort for consistent tardiness throughout her three years of employment with Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale, breached the confidentiality agreement to not share any information regarding the process used to create “Ever-Gold,” by sharing key process elements in producing

A court order has ruled to deny an emergency motion filed by SGA presidential candidate Jacob Milich in his constitutional challenge case against UCF. The ruling was made on March 15, a day before Sen. Milich was scheduled to appear before the SGA elections commission for alleged campaign violations. On March 10, Milich filed a lawsuit against the University of Central Florida Board of Trustees, UCF’s Student Government Association, SGA’s election commission, student body president Cait Zona, supervisor

Non-Disclosure Agreement and Non-Competition Agreement This Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of the _22nd__ day of _____December_, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Christa Jones (“Employee”) and HELPING HANDS HOME HEALTHCARE AND STAFFING AGENCY, LLC; HELPING HANDS HOME HEALTHCARE AND STAFFING AGENCY, LLC d/b/a ELYSIAN HOSPICE; KRAY PROPERTIES, LLC; and KOUNTRYVIEW ESTATE, LLC, collectively Illinois Limited Liability Companies and any entity that is wholly or partially

In accordance with article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, created in 1948, American citizens are entitled to, "the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and wellbeing of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services..." (Universal Declaration of Human Rights). This declaration also goes on to give a special mention to mothers and children, and their need for additional assistance. With this in mind, states

Memo Introduction In paper, Greene’s Jewelry has a strong case against Jennifer Lawson because Jennifer breached the confidentiality agreements that she signed with Greene’s Jewelry. In the agreement, it specifically indicated that Jennifer could never disclose any information regarding “Ever-Gold” creating process, which is patented and owned by Greene’s Jewelry. Jennifer not only stole a draft letter that contains the details of creating Ever-Gold but also took it to Greene’s competitor Howell