Gay Marriage Should Not Be Allowed Anywhere On This Earth.

First gay marriage should be illegal cause of the fact it’s unnatural. How is gay marriage unnatural, and do to the fact it’s unnatural what can it cause? By being gay it can cause depression. How can being gay cause depression? It can cause depression because by where it is unnatural people will start to make fun of you or bully you. It also leads to suicide. Suicide is the leading death among gay and lesbians’ youth nationally. 30% of gay youth commit suicide around the age of 15 (wespeakforthem.org). Can gay marriage affect other people?

The essay written by Katha Pollitt, titled, “What’s wrong with gay marriage” is an intriguing one. At first, the author, explains the notion that marriage and procreation do not necessarily go hand-in- hand. And later, she carefully interprets the true meaning of marriage; by stating that there is a separation of church and state. Most importantly, the author speaks to her audience in a clear and logical manner; without adding personal biases. Although the essay may seem to have deterministic view on social behavior. Nonetheless, I believe that does not disqualify the series of argument which she makes.

Gay marriage is not the only issue that is being discussed throughout America involving the gay community. In a particular study done by USA Today, results showed that when Americans were asked if they think homosexual relationships between consenting adults should be legal, 46% answered yes (“USA Today” 6). However, when asked if they would then favor a law that would allow homosexuals to get married, only 24% were in favor (6). This survey also showed the differences of peoples’ ideas based on if they attended church or not (6). The results showed that 73% of Americans who attend church weekly oppose the legalization of gay marriage and only 38% of those who don’t attend church oppose legalization (6). These results show that for many Americans, marriage is a religious agreement, but for many others, marriage is a right that should be given to all who want to partake in it.

Gay marriage has been an issue for a very long time and since some states are legalizing it, many worry that it would soon be added as an amendment. The topic of gay marriage brings up religious, legal, and many other issues. In "What's wrong with Gay Marriage?" by Katha Pollitt, the author supports gay marriage and wants it legalized. She states that there is no problem with gay marriage and it's all a matter of separating the church and state. But in “Gay ‘Marriage’: Societal Suicide,” by Charles Colson, the author opposes the idea of gay marriage and states that it will destroy society. Marriage is intended to unite a man and a woman together to bring children into the world, but due to the same-sex marriage,

Gay marriage should not be recognized, similar to the opinion of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in the case of United States versus Windsor. Antonin Scalia argues, “The Court’s ruling in the United States versus Windsor would wrongly invalidate state efforts to limit lawful marriage to opposite-sex couples”. In this paper, I will explain the legal and constitutional reasoning on why same-sex marriage shouldn’t be legalized nationally.

Pollitt uses a series of analogies to convey that there is no substantial issue with permitting same-sex marriage. Furthermore, the comparisons she presents strengthen her argument and defend against possible counter-arguments. She attacks the notion of preventing homosexual marriage on the grounds of procreation and claims that the very idea is impractical. The law “allows married couples to use birth control, to get sterilized, to be celibate” (Pollitt 530). If marriages do not have to be based on ability to reproduce, then two individuals of the same gender

Marriage, by definition, is the institution whereby men and women are joined in a special kind of social and legal dependence for the purpose of founding and maintaining a family. In today’s society however, things are changing. People of all genders are forming bonds with one another, and homosexuals are vying for the right to have their love established as marriage as well. Should men and men, and women and women, be allowed the right of marriage just like heterosexual couples in America? Andrew Sullivan and William Bennett have opposing opinions on this subject, however are more alike in opinion than they know. Their articles tell different stories, with the same general underlying tone.

The two texts examined within, present the opposing extremes of views regarding gay and lesbian marriage. The first text entitled Let Gays Marry by Andrew Sullivan examines the intricacies of same sex relationships and why homosexual couples should be allowed to publicly show affection for one another. The second text that will be examined is titled Leave Marriage Alone written by William Bennett. Bennett gives his views on why couples of same sex nature should not be allowed to engage in marital relations. These two authors, although very different, each has a view of the ideals of marriage, and how it should be presented to the public.

Have you ever heard the quote, “till death do us apart”? Or do you know people that are married? Marriage is a beautiful privilege every person of the world has been granted by the constitution. It’s logical; if two people love each other, they will marry. But how is it that such a basic right has been prohibited from gays? Gay people deserve the right to love and be loved like the rest of us. Gay marriage is how legal in all 50 states in the U.S. however, it is not legal everywhere. European countries like, Hungary, Montenegro, Poland, Serbia and Ukraine to name a few still prohibit gay marriage. I think gay marriage should be allowed in all counties because they deserve to be happy like the rest of the people of the world.

“Why I am ashamed today to call myself an Iowan.” caught my eye as I searched for an opinionated article to write a rhetorical analysis over.The purpose of this article was for the author, Emily Heyer, to express her thoughts and opinions for gay marriage, and to share her views on why Iowa should have been pro gay marriage in 2011. This article is a straight woman’s view on gay marriage and why Iowa should have voted in favor for gay marriage in 2011. The author gives examples of times when Iowa voted towards equality. She argues that if gays are not allowed to be married because they can’t procreate that women who are unable to have children and all couples that can’t reproduce without a medical intervention should also be banned from marriage. The author, Emily Heyner, builds her credibility with facts, quotes, and logical reasoning. However, toward the end of this article, Heyner begins comparing Gay Rights to some of the United States most dark historical events, including slavery and Native America Genocide.

One of the most controversial issues around today is gay marriages. Many believe that the media is primly responsible for the idea of same-sex marriages, but when it all comes down to it there are really only two sides; those who support gay marriages, and those who oppose them. Two authors write their opinions on their opposite views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports same-sex marriages and believes marriage to be a universal right, not just restricted to heterosexuals. Contrary to Sullivan, Bennett (2002) believes that marriage is a sacred traditional family value that should be set aside for heterosexual couples. (2002)Throughout this essay, I will summarize both authors’ ideas and evaluate them through their evidence and

As the society changing, the history of marriage also changes. Marriage is legally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship, but do those two partners always have to be a man and a woman? Most people believe that homosexuals should be granted equal rights as heterosexual couples. Being as an important social issue, same-sex marriage has become a hot topic of public debates in the recent years. For over the past decade, public support for the same-sex marriage has quickly risen. The United States is one of over twenty countries that allow gay and lesbian couples to wed. I believe that same-sex marriage should be legalized in all countries for several reasons, such as being an issue of equal rights, separation of church and state, no negative effect on the heterosexual communities, increasing in child adoption, and decreasing divorce and suicide rates.

      Gay marriages should be banned because God did not intend women to sleep with each other, nor men with men. It is a major sin. Plus, children should not be taught that same sex relationships are permitted. The effects on young children being subjected to gay marriages is the major

At this point I would like to raise some objections that have come to my mind. Many will probably disagree on the grounds that gay rights or same sex marriage should be banned or that it’s wrong under their religions. With that there are many factors that contradict against gay rights, such as religion, child adoption, and divorce just to name a few. Roger Severino, a graduate from Harvard Law School, and has a master in public policy claims the negative collusions that are against gay rights (924). Severino tells us that gay marriage conflicts with religious beliefs because it ruins the traditional marriage between a man and a woman and it ruins the definition of marriage (941-946). Similarly with the article, “Should Gay Marriage Be Legal?” from ProCon.org presents several bad aspects about same sex marriage. Some of the negative aspects presented in this article are that marriage has always been recognized as two heterosexual people. For example, in 1971 the Supreme Court confirmed that “the institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family” (Should Gay Marriage Be Legal). The article mentions that since homosexuals will not be able to reproduce, they are most likely adopt children, but the problem with this is that a child needs both of their heterosexual parents. It has been proven that a child who is raised under a same sex couple have more difficult lives than those raised by heterosexual

As we know, same-sex marriage has been a prominent issue that has so many arguments not just in the United States, but around the world over many years now. There is absolutely nothing more controversial than same-sex marriage in gay rights topic. Everyone has different opinions about same-sex marriage whether it should be legal or not. We now have to consider two aspects that are moral and religious. These two form a fundamental belief that same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples are different. Based on the definition of marriage, the view of religion, bad effects to children, and the lifestyle that should not be encouraged; therefore, the government should not legalize the same-sex marriage.