Gender Equality In The Military

2. To illustrate the reason why women should be required to register for selective service, recent updates to military policy allowing women to fill roles they were previously barred from has started the process of gender equality policy in the military. Women are now able to fill roles in direct ground combat after Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta ended the ground combat rule exclusion for female service members.1 In 1998, the question of Selective Service enrollment was posed by Senator Charles Robb as a member of the Subcommittee on Readiness and Senate Armed Services Committee to the General Accounting Office (GAO).2 The response by the GAO was that women should not have to register due to that fact women were restricted from direct ground combat roles. With this restriction now removed, women should

In the tragic case that the United States does have to call for another draft at least they’ll have the numbers they need to support the military. If the United States is willing to call a draft it is apparent that they need help. According to Scott Dunn, an army lawyer “Congressional opposition to drafting women centered on the exclusion of women from combat roles” (Dunn 8). In January 2016 women were granted the right to choose any military job including combat roles. Now that women can participate in combat there is no excuse for them not to be required to register for the draft. It is now legal for women to hold all the same positons as men so, what makes them less when it comes to being drafted? With the help of women, the military will be able to cover more ground than ever before. Instead of only using the women as nurses which takes more training than combat, the military can now train women to become fit for combat if necessary. Women will not only contribute to the numbers, but to the leadership needed in front line roles. According to Harvard Business Review, a journal written by professors and students at Harvard Law School, “More women were rated by their peers, their bosses, their direct reports, and their other associates as better overall leaders than their male counterparts — and the higher the level, the wider that gap grows” (Women’s Bureau 1). This is important because it proves that women can be a vital contribution to combat roles. Not only can they participate in the battles, but they can help lead them also. The more women military leaders there are in the military the more diverse the military will

I agree with women participating in combat. I feel women are sometimes minimized and overlooked to the things that they can and are capable of doing. If I was to serve in the military I would not be affected by someone of a different gender. I believe that can only happened if a female does not have the self-esteem and confidence that they need. When someone has these things, there is nothing that can bring someone down or have a person feeling less than what they are. Years ago, a lot of the jobs women did in the military were not at all dangerous. They were not allowed to do certain things in the military because they are women. Today women and men are put on for the same jobs. I think although we as a society have not reached the level

Men have always been looked upon as the leading sex. Looking back through history women have been the ones who take care of the home and children, while men are the ones who work and go to war. However in recent years there’s no doubt that women have become much more equal in the work force. Nevertheless men are still the ones who are forced to fight our wars when the time calls for it. Many think that women should be entirely equal to men having their choice to be drafted taken away but the fact is that they are physically at a disadvantage, too emotionally oriented, and the increase of female presence would have a more negative impact in the military in the way of social interactions.

Women serving in the military is a topic that most people have very strong convictions on. Rather you are for or against women serving, you can find strong opinions that support both sides in this contentious dispute. Women have struggled to fit into the military life for years. Even though woman have fought alongside men in each key battle from the start of the American Revolution, they still find it hard to shake the stereo types about woman who serve. Woman have always had to cloak themselves in a masquerade of sorts to serve alongside men. When woman were finally accepted into the military, they were given secondary roles to the men. The Pentagon has just recently began to realize that gender really do not matter on the battlefield. Since the Pentagons enlightenment, one can now see progress in the integration of women in all expanding military careers. Women have always proven that they are not only an asset to the military but they are the strength of the America’s military.

Over the past few years, there has been huge discussions when the topic of equality for women who have joined the military is being brought up. Being that gender equality is a big thing in the military now, I decided to chose this topic and discuss how I feel about it. According to the United States constitution, all men are created equal and this does not exclude women. One of the main things I learned is that equality for women in the military is a major issue. There should be no gender inequality in the United States military period. Most jobs are now open to women that were once allowed for only a man to do but when it comes to something such as the military, it should have always been that way No one should be told they can’t do something when it requires fighting for your country. Even back when men were drafted in the military, women should have been able to get drafted as well. You would think the military would take any and everybody that is willing to fight for his or her country simply because it would make our job easier as a whole. Frequently, women are stereotyped as feeble and incapable of doing certain things. Nevertheless, this should not be applied in any kind of career, particularly in the military.

The editorial “Including Women in the Draft” was made in 2003, when the American people were extremely patriotic, with a strong desire to send troops overseas to war. It was meant for university students, suggesting that this was meant either in a manner to recruit women, but possibly to humor these university students about a draft. The persona the author presents in the editorial is one that shows pride in the country, and expects that pride to be reciprocated by the readers. Like any rhetoric, the author wants to persuade the reader that his perspective is the correct perspective. The author structures the piece in such a way that by suggesting women not going into the draft is unsupportive of gender equality, as other countries include

Women were clerks or nurses. Eliminating any gender-based assignment restrictions or draft will improve our military's readiness and ability to recruit and retain the most effective and qualified people. The military needs lawyers, dentists, doctors and IT professionals. They also need intelligence analysts, police officers, and trained fighters women or not. Equality means the state of being equal, especially in status, rights and opportunities.

In terms of modern-day combat, women do not have an equal opportunity to survive."(Messay, 3) Some argue that it is a women 's right to be in combat, but anyone will agree that equal opportunity does not play part in combat. "Feminists and their supporters want to gender-neutralize the military be incrementally ditching common sense policies. This latest study, which claims that women can be trained to be like men, contributes to this misguided ideology, weakens the force structure at its core, and puts America 's military personnel in peril." continues Lt. Col. Maginnis. (Messay, 3) When we try to force and shove women into dangerous situations, we are ignoring their rights instead of protecting them. The dropout rate for women is higher than for men. Leading the dropout rates are white women with an average rate of 43%, followed by black women at 33% and Hispanic women with 31% (Park). This can be directly pointed to the physical demands that a women faced in basic training.

If a woman gets pulled in the draft and goes through the same training as the men than she has proven she can handle herself alongside men. I highly doubt that in a time of battle a man will treat a woman any differently; that is your teammate, comrade and fellow soldier you fight with them as if they are no different. Many people are still stuck in their previous ways, we need to get out of the World War II mindset where women stayed behind. I think society as a whole has made great strides since then in the field of equality so to subject women out of the draft does not seem just to

American Society has changed and evolved at a record pace over the past decade. Technology, social media, sexual orientation, and race relations have all been hotly debated topics. On January 24, 2013, when then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta rescinded the rule that restricted women from serving in combat units and directed the Armed Services to review their occupational standards and assignment policies, the discussion of women in Combat Arms was thrust into the limelight. The debate on whether to allow women in direct combat roles is an emotional topic for most and it appears the latest policy change could very well be a mistake.

In Conclusion, even though there are many cons in putting women in a draft that does not mean they shouldn't. Everything has a reason to it and everything happens for a

In the article “Women in the Military” mentions the women have been joining the military since 2000. Besides that, women who serve the military do require a lot of physical requirement because of stereotypical thinking of women being weak. Even more, some commanders want more women to participate in the use of technology. Women tried fighting this kind of idea but managed to fail; In 2003 young women named Lynch was the only survivor of an insurgent attack in Iraq, which motivated more women to join the army. Even more, women that join the army also experienced harassment and rape. After these incidents, it was decided that the military training was not going to be co-ed basic training. By doing this the pentagon announced in 2013 that they

Women have been participating in the United States military since the Revolutionary War, where they were nurses, maids, cooks and even spies. They played vital roles in order to keep those fighting on the front lines healthier, and even a more important role in keeping commanding officers informed with private information stolen from the other side. Although the Revolutionary War took play in 1776, the first law to be passed that permanently stated that women have an official place in the military was in 1948, almost one hundred and seventy-two years later. Since that time there has been a lack of true growth when it comes to integration of females in the military. In 1994, a law was passed that tried to prohibit women from being assigned to ground combat units below the brigade level. Women are excluded from more then 25% of active combat roles within the military and only in 2013 was the ban lifted which was the final barrier to allowing women into all active roles. This has been a huge step in the direction for women being considered as being equal but there are still challenges that women face within the military. Ranging from sexual assault, discrimination, bullying, and other tactics, it is clear that for many, the military is still a “boys club.”

“We are all equal; it is not birth but virtue alone that makes the difference.” This insightful quote from the famous French philosopher and historian “Voltaire” seems to accurately represent the beliefs of the factions of American citizens pushing to allow women to fight in combat positions within the US Armed Forces. Though the topic has just recently been boosted into the media and congressional politics, it has been long debated. A rather current editorial from USA Today titled: “Open Combat Positions to Women” outlines the recent developments in the status of a much disputed and controversial issue facing the nation today. Though somewhat less in-depth than some opposing opinions, the