Gene Doping, Should be worried? By Tom Pham Gene doping is a when a modified gene is added to help enhance a players sports performance, by a doctor and is very similar practise to gene therapy which Gene doping has both negative and positive impacts on the human body. Gene doping has the ability is enhances a players performance such as strength, not only this but it will has opened a new door to athletes There are many health risks involved it may cause cancer, but it also produces too many blood cells. It is also an unfair advantage as it the ability to enhance an athlete’s performance on the sports field is of a disadvantage to other players. Clinical studies (Hanson, 2008 ), conducted by scientists have come to agree that gene doping may be able to in …show more content…
These genetically altered mice were able to run up to 5km at a speed of 20m/min non stop, not only was their speed increased but their muscle build was also enhance. This study(Hanson, 2008 ) has show how this faster speed had exceeded the expected speed of the average mice as explained by (Friedman, 2014). Even research has agreed that gene doping has the ability to enhance a sports players performance both their speed and strength. As (Steadman, 2012) suggest Gene doping is not against the spirit of sport it is not ruining sport. It still drives the same determination for athletes to compete against each other to perform well. As reported in (Steadman, 2012) report, (Savulescu, 2012) quotes “ Doping is not against the spirit of sport”. “It has always of the human spirit to use knowledge to make oneself better and doping had been apart of sport since its beginning. “ an example provided by again provided by (Savulescu, 2012) drugs are able to remove emotions such as fear for a sporting activiny such as boxing but that is the spirit of boxing just hitting someone aimlessly feeling nothing it does not
He then looks at the term “gene doping.” Gene doping is using gene therapy for enhancement rather than healing; it is also viewed as cheating. Behar then explains that although gene doping found its use officially prohibited from the Olympics, gene doping is not easily detected as other substances prohibited from the Olympics. IGF-I genes become part of an athlete’s
Blood doping creates unneeded risk and endangers an athlete’s life for a slightly increased chance of winning a competition. This practice should remain banned and athletes should seek alternative practices that do not come with unusual added health risks. Though there are logical arguments for each side, there is more evidence to support the argument that blood doping should not be legal in athletic competitions. There is too much risk involved for the reward to be so miniscule.
Nobody would argue that the quality of sports is basically dependent upon the level of skill of its players. As the skills of the players improve, so too does the quality of the game. So why are substances that would further athletes’ skills beyond human levels so ostracized? Doping is the practice of using steroids and other illegal substances to boost performance in sports and athletics. The debate of the morality of such substances has been going on for decades and continues to affect the world of sports in many ways. At the moment, steroids and all other performance-enhancing drugs are banned in their entirety from nearly all sports in most countries of the world. Scandalous lawsuits involving athletes abusing substances are constantly popping up, usually involving players and athletes that were considered fan-favorites or even heroes. Performance-enhancing drugs should be allowed in sports because it would make it easier to control them, allow athletes to perform better, and widespread use of steroids would allow more solid research and advancements in the pharmaceutical field.
Doping in sports has caused a lot of controversy throughout the years in the sports world from youth sports to the professionals. The World Anti-Doping Agency does their best to catch all the drug users but falls short with some people. This causes for an “unfair” advantage and goes against the true value of sport. It can make these players stronger and more athletic which causes more excitement for the fans to watch, more revenue for teams, and growing popularity. Using performance-enhancing drugs is banned in almost every sport, but with the allowed use of them could bring to the players and the sports teams themselves, could outweigh the negative effects of them being used in sports.
The use of drugs date back to the ancient Olympic games. This is where the word doping originated from which was the Greek word “doop” (CITE). Performance enhancing substances also known as steroids are used for the improvement of human activity. Because drug use is also a huge thing outside the United States the International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) was created as the first international governing body to prohibit doping. However, at the 1960’s Olympic the first athlete to die of doping was of the name Knut Jensen. He was a Danish cyclist who was found with narcotics in his system which resulted to his death. In result, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) was established to fight doping. The United States created their own anti-doping agency called United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA). Therefore, drug testing is an important factor in professional sports world-wide.
Explanation: If drugs and enhancers were granted for competitive game, it would be a match between who can afford and take the best drugs rather than the natural raw talent to those athletes who trained for their success.
Every athlete has wished they could jump a little higher, swim a little longer and run a little faster. Throughout the history of sport there have been accounts of chemical enhancements taken by athletes to give them this advantage. This has developed more as time has taken its grasp on modern medicinal practices. People try to obey the laws of a pure sport, yet there seems to be an increasing margin of those who “dope” and get away with it and the small group those that does not, how does this still happen? Is the solution to just allow doping? While with so much speculation and ethically derivative rhetoric to be examined, doping to increase strength in a sport is explicitly wrong to the sport itself. Chemical enhancements discredit the integrity
Prohibition of doping in competitions can protect the well-being of athletes and maintain fairness and
In addition, doping in sports can be detrimental to the athletes health. Specifically, as stated in the article “ Is It Time To Allow Drugs in Sports?,” “We would be encouraging athletes to take these drugs and put their own personal health in danger” (Nolan). To explain, if we would allow athletes to take performance enhancing substances we would be putting their own health in jeopardy. Therefore, athletes taking performance enhancing substances is a major danger in which it may risk the athlete's lifestyle and well being . Additionally, according to Tannsjo article , “The Moral Case against Doping Bans”, “We often meet the argument that since doping jeopardizes the health of the athlete, it must be prohibited ”(Tannsjo). In order words, the
IV. Conclusion: Performance enhancement causes health and social problems to track and field athletes, but some athletes use enhancement even though they know the risk.
Few within the realm of competitive athletics would argue with the importance of being mentally prepared prior to an athletic competition as well as the need to maintain that particular mindset during a competitive contest. Nevertheless, recent research has shown that many athletes, coaches, and sporting administrators are still quite reluctant to seek out the services of a qualified sport psychologist, even if they believe it could help. One of the primary reasons for this hesitation appears to be a lack of understanding about the process and the mechanisms by which these mental skills affect performance. Unlike the “harder sciences” of sport physiology and biochemistry where athletes can see the tangible results in themselves or other athletes (e.g., he or she lifted weights, developed larger muscles, and is now stronger/faster as a result) (Gee, Chris J (2010): 386-402.) Using sports phycology has been found to give athletes multiple benefits, such as improvement, and that athlete being able to understand how to develop a growth and or positive mindset. Lastly another way that has been found to improve athletes is taking mental repetitions for their sport. One of the keys to Jeff’s improvement over the years, and certainly a key to him making a roster in the NFL, is his ability to take mental reps. The champion mindset recognizes
Doping has widely become known as the use of banned substances and practices by sports personnel particularly athletes in an attempt to improve sporting performances. No sensible fan of sport today denies the prevalence of drugs in virtually every major sport, yet none would argue they can ever be eliminated completely. Money alone would seem to guarantee that much. High profile athletes today are competing for high stakes, not just millions, but dozens of millions. The fear of losing everything career, opportunity, contracts, name, fame, and money is pushing more sportsmen all over the world to use performance enhancing drugs, mainly
Do you want to want to become the peak athlete that you know your body is capable of? Well, this paper will not do that for you, but it will tell you how, and it will tell you why it should be legal to do so. Doping in sports is one of the most extensive debates within the realm of athletics. Whether it be injecting anabolic steroids, consuming them, or blood doping, athletes will do drugs. Doping has no effect on the viewership of the sport. Athletes can always find ways to cheat the system, and trying to prevent the use seems impossible. The use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) should be legalized, as long as it is allowed under medical supervision.
“The International Olympic Committee first instituted doping controls at the 1968 Winter Olympics in Grenoble, France and again at the Summer Olympics in Mexico City that same year. Anabolic steroids were added to the list of banned substances in 1975 and have reported more than 2,000 cases per year” (Asimor).The number of athletes tested positive for steroid intake is on the rise every year as well as the consequences of such action. Individual athletes or athletic teams are automatically disqualified and expelled from competition, forced to return titles, and kept in unchangeable record files.
Gene doping is an extension of gene therapy. Though, instead of injecting DNA into specific cells for the purpose of repairing the function to a damaged or missing gene, gene doping involves implanting DNA for the purpose of enhancing athletic performance. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), an international organization created in 1999 to "promote, coordinate, and monitor the fight against doping in sport in all its forms," defines gene doping as the "nontherapeutic use of cells, genes, genetic elements, or modulation of gene expression, having the capacity to enhance performance" (World Anti-Doping Agency, 2008).