Gene Splicing Essay

DNA are like legos, they work together to build the traits of living things. They are the building blocks of the body. Many scientists today have been figuring out different ways to manipulate, change, add, and subtract genes from the DNA in living things; this is process is called genetic engineering. Some of the living things being experimented on are live people, plants, and animals. Today scientists are debating on the morals of genetic engineering due to what the community thinks of it, because of the christian 's viewpoint of genetic engineering. To some christians it may pose a threat to their, but to others it may be a blessing or a gift. Genetic Engineering is a growing breakthrough in the science community. “Over the last 30 years, the field of genetic engineering has developed rapidly due to the greater understanding of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) as the chemical double helix code from which genes are made. The term genetic engineering is used to describe the process by which the genetic makeup of an organism can be altered using “recombinant DNA technology.” This involves the use of laboratory tools to insert, alter, or cut out pieces of DNA that contain one or more genes of interest.”(Pocket K No. 17) Scientist have yet to unlock the full potential of genetic engineering, but the information and the use they have found for it today has reached farther than anyone 's expectations.

As explained in the book, Gene falls into the category of those who could afford to retire but choose to continue working; he has continued working even though he and his wife had sufficient combined benefits to retire. However, “Lois Smith’s own benefits would not have enabled her to lead a financially comfortable retirement if she were not married, and she would probably face some financial hardship if she were to become a widow” (Hutchison, 2015).

Worryingly, there has been minimal public debate regarding this technology that could irreversibly alter the human race. Instead, ethical discourse has been largely contained to scientific and political circles. It is extremely problematic that a large majority of the general public is unaware of the research and debate regarding human gene modification. In addition, the current debate has stagnated, with researchers and politicians being unable to find any common ground. However, upon close examination of the three main ideological groups within this controversy, a key similarity becomes apparent: each group, regardless of whether they are proponents or opponents of human gene

gene splicing is already in effect.’ I am fully aware that many different genetically modified

Throughout the world, many intelligent minds exist. One, in particular, had something to say about Human genetic engineering. “Nuclear weapons need large facilities, but genetic engineering can be done in a small lab. You cannot regulate every lab in the world. The danger is that either by accident or design, we create a virus that destroys us” (Stephen Hawking). Hawking is considered to be one of the most intelligent people in the modern world. For this reason, his statement is not to be taken with a grain of salt. The concept of Human genetic engineering is surrounded with danger and controversy. There are several different positions on human genetic modification. Conservatives, or Traditionalists believe such innovation or change would be detrimental towards the human race. Conservatives say that families are the foundation of society so changing how families come to be would ultimately tear society apart (Foht). Others say that innovation of such magnitude would act as a boon to the human race. Concerning the danger of genetic engineering, it could definitely become an immense detriment. However, with the correct limitation and government oversight, the human race will benefit from it. Genetically engineering a Human embryo is a step that science will eventually take. Whether it be decades or centuries from now, genetically modified humans will walk the Earth.

Now there are some people that are strongly against this.There are many people that believe scientist are ‘playing God’ by changing the gene of people.But genetically engineering isn't just for modifying humans but also for curing some disease.It's called gene therapy and it had cured some disease for example Cancer, Aids and much more.It’s better for us to act than to not act at

Scientists have recently brought up the idea of genetically engineering humans, as if we are machines that need to be tinkered with. Genetic engineering is the deliberate modification of the DNA of an organism. We have seen this type of modification in the food that we have consumed and in the animals that many purchase. It has never been proven to be 100% safe for humans to consume genetically modified food as it is not from nature and our bodies do not know how to react. Also there have been many cases where purebred dogs have been susceptible to numerous diseases because of the decreased gene pool they were modified from, which is the cause of inbreeding. Scientists must never engineer humans because we have seen the bad effects it has had

“While 83 percent of the American public is solidly against editing genes for frivolous purposes such as increasing intelligence, about half of those asked were fine with the idea of doing so to treat diseases (Gebelhoff).” Although at the current point most speculation is merely empty conjecture, it is not unreasonable to assume that a nation or group will seize or develop powerful technology for genetic adaptation; some circles see eventual large-scale human genetic modification as inevitable. At the present time, “the idea of using Crispr-Cas9 for human reproduction is largely rejected in principle by the medical research community” due to fears it could lead down the road to “non-therapeutic genetic enhancement (Ball).” This is code for

While saving lives is an attractive prospect, several ethical objections have been raised. Firstly, it may be wrong to make major changes to human DNA at all, as it alters the innate nature of humanity. Secondly, the technology has the potential to be used for other, controversial purposes, such as manufacturing humans or enhancing traits. These ethical concerns must be weighed against the benefits of developing this

A chimera is made of cells that are derived from two or more organisms. They can occur in nature. For example, when two separate sperm fertilize two separate eggs and the embryos somehow fuse together creating a single fetus with genetically distinguishable cells, tetragametic chimerism occurs. Although, chimeras are more commonly man-made. One way to make a chimera is to introduce the organs of one organism to another. In organ or tissue transplants, the host receives two genetically distinct cells or tissues, creating a tissue chimera. The other method is introducing one organism’s cells to the embryo of another and letting them grow together into a hybrid. Scientists have found a way to use this unique method to create a human-chimera.

“Every 30 seconds of every day that passes, there is a person that dies, that could be cured by using tissues or organs for transplantation,” says Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte, a professor at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies. A Chimera is any animal that composes cells that originate from another species. In the past, scientists created pigs with human blood, fused human cells with rabbit eggs, gave mice human brains, replaced damaged human heart valves with cow’s and pig’s. Scientists should be allowed to mix human and animal DNA to create Human Chimeras. Scientists have been using Chimerism to grow organs, study diseases, and learn more about the human neurological system. These Chimera’s can be very beneficial to the world of science.

Human arrogance is always the main concern when dealing with genetic engineering due to our lack of knowledge. The truth about the human genome still remains unknown, even with the CRISPR system. Scientists are able to edit a gene but could quite possibly never know the full extent of the alterations. For an example, say there is a genetically altered baby that has been inserted with a gene that will make the child good in sports. This will make the child predisposed to like sports, but could that also mean they could also be inclined to dislike music? Genetic engineers do not know enough about DNA to answer questions such as this. This is where religions are concerned because most “share a deep uneasiness regarding actions that might alter

One of the biggest pictures that are against genetic engineering is that humans are not supposed to play the role of God. DNA is a unique thing to every person. Bioengineering itself involves the very technical aspects of modification, and the enhancement of stem cells or DNA and this process can change the human structure. “The progress of civilization has been having been largely dependent upon the out ‘interference with nature’.”(Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences).

Imagine that Sunday morning bacon smell is crafted in a laboratory by gene splicing and corn on the cobb was sprayed by herbicide that just created a new mega weed that might destroy all wheat on earth. Most of the food people eat in this world contains genetically modified organisms. If you haven’t thought about what was in your last meal, then you may need to start thinking about it. 92% of corn in America is genetically modified, and 94% of soybeans are created or modified in a lab. An estimated 75% of processed food is genetically modified (United States Department of Agriculture). In other words, most of the food the average American eats is altered from its natural state. GM foods are created when scientists take traits from specific animals or plants and add them to other animals or plants. For example, add a specific type of growth hormone to a pig and one has more pig than without.

“Genetic engineering differs from cloning in key ways. Whereas cloning produces genetically exact copies of organisms, genetic engineering refers to processes in which scientists manipulate genes to create purposefully different versions of organisms—and, in some cases, entirely new living things”, duplication of genetic cells is known as human cloning. Development of genetic engineering biotechnologies undermines the natural autonomy of life. Does genetic engineering interfere with God’s natural order or a manipulation of God creation and the intended purpose of our lives? Genetic engineering goes against the theological belief of the authority of God and religion governance order. This new paradigm of genetic engineering reproduction of life as we know is an interference of the creation of God’s and life. I believe if we continue the use of genetic engineering cloning it is against everything we believe in, genetic engineering is not God’s will and it should be prohibited,