General Strain Theory And Its Effect On Human Behavior

990 Words4 Pages
Often Agnew distinguishes between state anger and trait anger, with the former being the focus of his theory. Noxious events avoidance impacts the ability to maintain or come up with relationships, resulting in alternative reactions. An adverse environment perception will result in emotions that are strongly negative that motivate a person to engage in crime. Being involved in crime is sporadic according to Agnew, and the criminals would desist were it not for the persistent negative effect and events. General strain theory is mainly concerned with the strain types and not the strain sources, and this implies that its aim is to gather ultimately the multi-item injustice measures. The previous strain theorist’s contributions have to be necessary for a complete model development, and Agnew suggest that drawing from other disciplines, but he does not incline to psychological variables in his theory. The theory by Agnew for example strongly holds that strain results in personality, and not that personality results to strain. This concept is best expressed by the idea that strain results to personality is irritability. Solidarity adaptations can also be made possible with the two of the main causal factors of the theory, hassles, and stress, but no or little variation by socio-demographic categories is postulated (Agnew, 1992). There also exists a third causal factor, sense of injustice or inequality, which has unfortunately attracted little coverage in the literature. The
Get Access