Genetic Discrimination Essay

   The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be

I agree with your opinion in how genetic technology could leave a negative impact to our society. I believe the idea of genetic engineering is not natural. We have no idea of the harm that could result from this technology. Genetic engineering is another step in giving humans their desires. I believe that altering the DNA of any life form is not just. Genetically manipulating a life form could put an imbalance in nature and society. No one should have the right to manipulate the genetics of other life forms. The idea of genetic engineering is be consider unethical because it is enforcing animal cruelty. Furthermore, I am appalled that some parent choose their child’s appearance, rather than go through the ‘natural’ process, to prevent bullying and discrimination.

I support the guidelines outlined by Kitcher for the use of genetic information because of their responsible and ethical nature. I believe that future generations will benefit as a direct consequence of these guidelines. I shall begin by defining eugenics as the study of human genetics to improve inherited characteristics of the human race by the means of controlled selective breeding.

The benefits of genetic science for society is for employers who want to know if their employers are in excellent working condition and if the worker will cause them more money when obtaining health insurance. If an employer hires someone that that is healthy then the cost of health insurance does not rise and the employee will not have to downgrade their health insurance plan so that they can accommodate the employee that is not healthy. The limitations of genetic science for society are the possibility of genetic testing causing safety issues at work, the development of a genetic low class, the breach of privilege and confidentiality, and the utilization of genetic bias to excuse different methods of discrimination (Krumm, 2002).

Genetic testing has become a highly controversial issue among both the general population and the scientific community. It is a process that exposes a person’s entire genome sequence, allowing it to be read and evaluated to identify potential risks for genetic diseases or diseases that could be passed onto offspring (Holt Productions, 2012). With thousands of genetic tests already being used, and more being established, it seems logical to put this growing technology to use. Some agree that it is a person’s right to know and understand his or her genetic makeup. However, others argue that, despite the benefits of genetic testing, caution should be used to carefully inspect the risks associated with this new technology.

(a) A clear scholarly definition(s) of the disorder, "a serious psychiatric condition associated with instability in affect and identity, significantly impaired interpersonal relationships, and self-injurious behaviors".

The Goal of the Human Genome Project is to obtain genetic mapping information and to determine the complete sequence of all human DNA by the year of 2005. The project started in 1990 and 180 million dollars are being spent on it annually. This adds up to a total of over 2 billion dollars for the 15 year budget. Of this 2 billion dollars budgeted, 5% is spent annually on the ethical, legal and social issues. This report focused on some of these issues.

Minorities are at a disadvantage in today’s society because do not fit in white America. Thus, if minorities today are faced with discrimination for their religion, race, economic status; genetically modifying the human genome would only further class divisions because white nationalists would be able to create genetically perfect babies who will prosper in today’s white

This Bayesian Network diagram illustrate if a patient is affected by diabetes and the steps he or she can take to figure out how to go about treatment, cost and how to control the diabetes.

The world of Genetics is one that is both fascinating and interesting. When tackling how genetics plays a role in behavior, one must look within the scope of what genetics is before dealing with how it plays a significant role in one’s behavior. Simply put, genetics is the study of genes. It is a biological component within the entire study of biology itself. Scientists who study genetics and perform research do so with the intent to learn more about how genetics affects the overall attitudes, behaviors and dispositions of individuals. It could be said that genetics is somewhat of a psychological-biological science as researchers look at the underlying patterns within the genes that cause

To both governments and companies this a a green gold mine because this is something that can be used to their advantages when picking out their future employees. The genetic information will be use to set insurance premiums and how much you will cost a company that will pay for your insurance. This will be used by educational purposes to see if you are on the right track for your future or if you are going to struggle. In fact “ That same genetic information can be used by schools, employers, insurance companies, and governments to determine educational tracks, employment prospects,insurance premiums, and security clearances, giving rise to a new and virulent form of discrimination based on one's genetic profile”.(Tarcher) The large demand for genetic engineering is scary because this can change how the world works. “The increasing consolidation of companies alarming because biotech revolution will affect aspect of your life. The way we eat, educate, and raise our children, the way we work and how we see ourselves in the world.” (Rifkin) This could have different effects on people because not everyone sees this as a bad issue because they have disorders that could be solved from genetic modification. One problem this is causing is the fights between countries that are technologically advanced and the countries that are developing but are rich in resources for

The first issue about genetic testing is the discrimination that can come out from your results that all questions that people have are to understand if they should really beginning their tested” because information about individuals Health can be used to discriminate against them the Privacy provisions of u.s. health insurance portability and Accountability Act of 1996( HIPAA) was revised in 2003 to create a category of protected health information that can be used or disclosed only under certain conditions (Nature). Genetic discrimination occurs if people are treated unfairly because of differences in the DNA that can increase their chances of getting a certain disease. “An example of genetic discrimination in the workplace occurred in 2000 at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company employees who file claims and sought medical attention for carpal tunnel syndrome or required to submit blood samples”( Fulda). Concerns about genetic testing and genetic discrimination became a big issue in the late 1990’s even though we have laws that make an act discrimination illegal people still have worries about their genetic information being used illegally(). “Genomic can enable the misuse and abuse of our most personal information”( Nature). Given the prevalence of genetic mutations, any one of us could have a predisposition for a genetic disorder. The availability of genetic tests for some of these predispositions has clear benefits for treatment and prevention

Mapping for genes that can cause cancer, for example, and eradicating them makes sense and is socially beneficial. However, it can have social consequences. For instance, if a parent decides not to apply genetic modification and has a genetically, natural abnormal child such as one with Down 's Syndrome, then they may be criticized and ostracized by not following the trend of choosing a genetically modified baby. Those with disabilities will be discriminated against more heavily, and the elimination of these genes will “[. . .] lead to a decrease in services and treatments available for individuals with those disabilities. Given the potential discrimination and inequality issues that PGD may

Many who attempt to take a stance on genetic engineering are unaware of what it actually is, and therefore are unable to make a proper argument. There have been several instances in which a debate has taken place over the topic, yet half of those who participated did not have a proper understanding of it. In a study taken place to measure the general biomedical and genetic literacy in the U.S and Europe, results showed that “the US came in at the middle rank of 28th among the 34 countries studied”(Source F). From this it can be concluded that many of those who attend these sort of events are not entirely informed and if they were to be informed it would lead to an overall sense of understanding. Therefore, genetic engineering is beneficial in the way that it will allow for people to be able to have more capability.

Human species has been suffering at the hands of disease since their genesis. Our relation with each other is such that if one suffers in pain, his suffering and pain touches rest of the humanity. It is now in our domain to use this new technology called "Genetic Engineering" to ameliorate human suffering and pain. We should make sure that this technology is only used for the betterment of human species and not selectively. It is indeed horrifying to know that someone wants to use this as a tool for eugenics or to alter the human race altogether. I totally agree with the specter mentioned in the book Babies by Design by Ronald M. Green (2007), that in case a human weakness has been eliminated through genetic engineering, and the few parents who opt for a "natural" conception run the risk of producing low quality "invalids"----who become members of a despised under-class. I am against selective genetic manipulation that will produce several classes of human species, which will be classified as good, better, best. I tend to disagree with Bill Mckibben on “If I am a world class runner, but my parents inserted the "sweatworks2010genepack" in my genome, can I really feel pride in my accomplishments” (ENOUGH 2003). Yes sir I can, because my gene carried an imperfection. It has been tweaked a bit to enhance my performance and that’s all there is to it. No qualms about it whatsoever. Humans have far more genetic defects than animals. We need to fix these defects once and for all