Genetic Editing Research Paper

Choose ONE topic. This is the “frame of reference” of the “context” within which you will compare and contrast two nations/periods.

“Eat your vegetables, they're good for you”, The words a kid never wants to hear. People scan food packages for whole grains and fibers, avoid sugar, and don’t even think about buying something with trans fats. Just when people thought they knew how to eat healthy, there's another problem: Genetically Modified Organisms. Some opponents would have you believe these ingredients are the dietary curse of the decade. How concerned should people really be though? This is one of the most debated questions around the world. Many environmental organizations protest against genetic engineering, but numerous companies continue to use it in food production. The issue of Genetically Modified foods has been investigated by many different scientists for many

The main characters in the book The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, experience personality changes because of the sins they commit. Chillingworth, Hester, and Dimmesdale all commit sins that change their character for better or worse. The consequences of the sins affects them mentally emotionally and physically.

The idea of genetically modifying food is great, but it is too good to be true. Underneath all the benefits lies many more disadvantages.

…a well-publicized study sharply criticized by industry found that rats fed GMO corn developed tumors and organ damage. Moreover, new questions continue to emerge.

Imagine going to the grocery store and seeing a seedless watermelon, but it is not the typical oval, it is square. Down the produce aisle, there are sweet, juicy strawberries; however, there is a warning label that says, “Do not consume if you have a nut allergy.” The world today is moving forward in the way that society produces our wholefoods. Genetic engineering, bioengineering, or biotechnology is the process of inserting the genetics of different plants and organisms into other plants or organisms to create new, more efficient DNA. However, is it truly beneficial to modify the world’s natural foods? The use of genetic engineering can disrupt the ecosystems that have taken billions of years to develop. Many years of research and work have gone into the subject of genetically modified foods; however, this new food trend could create or enhance food related illnesses and health problems, interfere with nature’s environs, and could even cause specific ethical problems for individuals that practice different faith. People should be aware of genetic engineering, how it works, and how it affects their lives.

We have been participating in a mass scale biotech agricultural experiment for over twenty years. Since the mid-1990s the U.S population has been consuming Genetically Engineered (GE) foods or foods that contain Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) without having done enough research to assess its long time effects on humans. According to the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA), agency responsible for protecting the public’s health and safety, “genetic engineering is the name given to certain methods that scientists use to introduce new traits or characteristics to organisms.” In other words, scientists modify the structure of plants or animals by removing some of their DNA material; or by inserting that

The animals that belong in our ecosystem is diminishing as time goes on, many of which we have not thought of becoming endangered, are being threatened. Scientists have figured out an alternative solution to save species from being threatened by humans and natural disasters. This alternative way is gene editing, as Joseph Dussault stated in the Christian Monitor: “Gene drive, a controversial genetic editing technique through which scientists could alter or eliminate entire species, is mostly discussed alongside Zika and malaria fears” (par. 2). It can help save species as well as turn it around and attack themselves for carrying a disease. With the use of gene editing, helping preserve the species

Gene editing has been a big technological topic that has been talked about a lot over the last few years. Is it ethical? Does it promote social justice? Is it good for the environment? I personally do not think it promotes any of these ideas. It signifies the idea that the rich get richer, and gene editing has a huge ethical complication. Not to mention that it is not the most natural thing to be able to edit genes to someone’s liking.

With only a 20-year history, genetic engineering is only a young science with much uncertainly relativity compared to other fields. Much of the elements bioengineering studies and experiments, the DNA genome and sequence, are still unknown to the scientific community. Changes in genes greatly transform the condition, structure, and essence of an organism, giving us an entirely different and unnatural creation. Even when the physical effects are barely noticeable or deemed safe and ethical, these modified creations’ effects on the environment are impossible to predict and will only emerge when the damage done becomes evident to the human population. Though a large unknown looms over modifying genes, bioengineering industries insist upon dismissing the scare over genetic foods with the vast potential “miracle” foods can benefit upon human society.

      In the past three decades, scientists have learned how to mix and match characteristics among unrelated creatures by moving genes from one creature to another. This is called “genetic engineering.” Genetic Engineering is prematurely applied to food production. There are estimates that food output must increase by 60 percent over the next 25 years to keep up with demand. Thus, the result of scientist genetically altering plants for more consumption. The two most common methods for gene transfer are biological and electromechanical. “Early experiments all involved changing DNA using bacterial vectors”(Randerson, 2001). Through other advances scientists proclaim how they can improve the human gene pool. All humans have

Not long ago a leading scientific journal called Nature, noted that the health minded are surrounded with advice pertaining to genetically modified crops. But they also noted that a lot of that information is false, on either side of the argument.

Imagine a world where medicines are taken by eating bananas, there are no shots, where tomatoes outlive frosts, plants are pesticide resistant, and one can get their recommended daily vitamins from rice. These occurrences are real, and they have succeeded. Scientist who study biotechnology use genetic engineering to create healthier and longer lasting food. This new technology is evolutionary and has many benefits, but it also has downfalls. Genetic engineering, or genetically modifying (GM), also named transgenics, is defined as “genetic segments [that] can be cut out of and spliced into genetic material almost at will” (Mellon, 2013) #. The genetic sequence of a food can be altered by this process. Genetic engineering of food is unconventional and unsafe because it can cause non-foreshadowed environmental issues, human concerns, and has political drawbacks. It defies nature itself; it leaves humanity with the question if the force of nature is one worth messing with.

Genome editing is a huge leap forward in science and medicine. Because of recent advances in technology, the study of genes and induced ‘point’ mutations have led to the discovery and advancement of methods previously used in order to mutate genes. The development of Clusters of Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPRs) and CRISPR associated system 9 protein (Cas9) technology is a hugely significant leap forward as this is a tool that could potentially be used for the research into and hopefully the treatment of a range of medical conditions that are genetically related. Cystic fibrosis (Schwank, G. et al, 2013), haemophilia and sickle cell disease are an example of some of the conditions that have the

The Malthusian Model compares growth rates between population and means of subsistence and describes what conditions characterize a Malthusian Economy. If a population is given the opportunity to double in size every twenty-five years, it would exhibit exponential growth. However, the means of subsistence do not grow exponentially but arithmetically (Elwell 2001, 5). The differing patterns of growth allow for a large gap between population and production to grow over time. In a Malthusian Economy, one would expect to see population and means of subsistence each grow marginally and alternately with neither exhibiting significant sustained growth. In pre-industrial Europe, we saw exactly this. Humans’ ability to produce food and children are not equal and it is through Malthusian population checks, without significant increases in technology, that populations can be sustained in the long-run (Elwell 2001, 5). Population checks would make it so the population would not grow far beyond the populations’ given means of subsistence. However, with the Industrial Revolution, agricultural productivity could increase in efficiency enough to sustain an exponentially growing population. Without technology and without positive checks, population would grow at the same exponential rate and means of subsistence would grow at the arithmetic rate, leading to an unsustainable population (Elwell 2001, 5). In summation, population grows at an exponential rate, which is controlled by positive