Genetic Engineering : Designer Babies

Have you heard of the new technology that allows parents to make their own perfect, desired child? Scientists are developing a technology called designer babies. Designer babies are essentially genetically engineered children that can also have artificially selected traits. This would lead to a powerful impact on society because there will be a clear division between the poor and wealthy due to the expenses of designer babies. There are dangerous risks, and in the long run, it will create more problems in the future. This is because there will be even more discrimination seeing that pure, non-genetically modified humans will become the inferior race (Thadani). Eventually, the genetically engineered race will take over the human race and this sort of technology may get into the wrong hands. The federal government should take action and quickly make laws to limit the use of the designer babies so the use of this technology will not get out of hand.

Imagine a parent walking into a conference room; a sheet of paper waiting on a table with a lot of different questions on it. Things that many parents wish they had control over. Options such as hair color, skin color, personality traits and other physical appearances are placed out across the page. When they fill questions out, a baby appears as it was described just before. The baby is in the picture of health, and looks perfect in every way.

Have you ever asked yourself is it possible to pick and choose your kids characteristics and appearance? If you ever have thought about this topic it is called designer babies and the technology used to do this is called CRISPR. In 2015 scientists in China tried to modify human embryos so that they could edit the genes of the embryos.(OI) This test failed horribly with all 86 of the embryos dying.(OI) Many people hope that one day designer babies will be a thing. I disagree with genetically modifying humans because in the bible it states, “God made you perfectly in his own image.”

Is this the child that you have envisioned in your future? Or maybe did you see your child with brown eyes rather than blue? Maybe more intellectually gifted? Or with the promise of performing well in sport?

The escalating supremacy and receptiveness of genetic technology to engineer and "design babies," now gives parents the option to modify their unborn children, consecutively to prevent their offspring's from receiving genetic disorders such as: "sickle cell diseases, cystic fibrosis and down syndrome ," or conceivably, make them blue eye coloured, intelligent or else blessed with enviable qualities. Would this mean there will be an increase in the superiority among the rich, both physically and mentally, or will this modification be available for all to exploit, or would we be evidencing engineered babies facing unexpected genetic predicament? The highly contentious issue of designing unborn children to be a perfect "epitome" is thoroughly investigated and examined in the article of, lead author of

So long as I maintain this Oath faithfully and without corruption, may it be granted to me to partake of life fully and the practice of my art, gaining the respect of all men for all time. However, should I transgress this Oath and violate it, may the opposite be my fate. This is a fragment of a vow known as the Hippocratic oath, which doctors take on when they are about to become physicians. This oath serves not only as a guideline of what is expected of them but also sets up a sort of boundary for the actions regarding their patients. This oath furthermore impedes doctors from having inhumane treatment or even attempt in most instances actions that benefit their own agenda instead of their patients. Of course this in itself is a

The thought of genetically modified humans sounds like an idea out of a novel of science fiction. Yet, genetic engineering is all around us. Designer babies is a controversial topic amongst the scientific community, religious groups, and the general public. One side of the argument is all in favor and wants more prevalent genetic modification of babies. The other side of the argument is against genetic modification of babies and believes it is immoral and unethical.

Between 1912 and 1932, three International Congresses took place as a global venue for scientists, politicians, social leaders to investigate and discuss plans and programs to improve human hereditary characteristics in the twentieth century. While the Nazi embrace of Eugenics was used for an unthinkable horror in the holocaust, the movement actually was re-invented and nurtured in America and England. President Theodore Roosevelt created a national Heredity Commission to discover the genetic heritage of the population and to encourage the good blooded families to increase, and the cross-bred inferior segment to decrease. Out of

A baby that has been genetically engineered to be perfect is called a designer baby. The media came up with this name, not scientists, to describe a baby that is designed to have or not have certain characteristics. Soon in the future, there are going to be humans who are bred with science to carry out certain tasks, and it is not going to be perfect no matter what people say (Hagler 1). Genetically engineering embryos is bad.

Science is now able to better improve human health and safety thanks to the advanced modern technology and medicine that are available. Yet with today's technology being implemented into science comes the questions of human morality, or bioethics. One of the bioethics debates is on the coined term “Designer babies”; on if or where society should draw the line on genetically altering our children before they are born. With the technology able to stop hereditary diseases, the scientific development’s are able to change the child’s “eye color, hair color, social intelligence, right down to whether or not your child would have a widow’s peak” before the child is born. From the options on choosing whether or not your child will look or act a certain

The process of creating life by handpicking a beings attributes and combining them to create a seemingly perfect human is a notion that is often related to the fictional work of Dr. Frankenstein. It is a surprise in its self that such a process is not in reality fictional, but an actual method of procreating infants in today’s modern day. Designer Babies, the end result of a scientific process that allows parents to preselect the genetic make up of their offspring, ensuring the disinheritance of a birth defect or guaranteeing the presence of a particular gene (Oxford Dictionaries 3). The process its self is called pre-implantation genetic diagnosis or embryo screening. Embryo Screening is as follows, a three-day-old embryo is taken and one

Medical and Technological advances have discovered new ways of genetic engineering. This genetic engineering could be helpful to society in eliminating diseases from family blood lines. However, many people fear this could be the beginning of Designer Babies. This is a baby that has been genetically modified to meet the appeal of the parents. Such modification could include changing eye color, hair color, skin color, height, athleticism, IQ, and the list goes on. Now at first it sounds great, here we can eliminate disease and make a stronger society. However this would be far from the truth. Let’s ask ourselves, how could the Designer Baby affect society as a whole? This would cost a considerable amount of money, meaning only the wealthier

Designer babies are created by an Embryo with IVF ( In-Vitro fertilization), then by removing a single cell from the embryo and testing the cell. Then the parents either decide if that is the perfect baby with the qualities that it wants and then implanted it inside the female's womb or try again.

It is a series of genes alongside the strong influence of external factors such as the environment. Nonetheless, technology and science continued to move in the direction of designer babies. Those who support human genetic engineering claim that the science is meant to prevent diseases and encourage more healthy births. They compared the use of gene therapy to prevent genetic diseases to medicine which helps cure it. Professor Lee Silver at Princeton University said, “Some people say we should not go against nature, but that’s illogical because every time we cure a disease we go against nature” (Schicholr, Simonet, and Canano, 2012). The pregnant women from the ABC NEWS study thought picking the traits of a child takes away the surprise. However, other felt different. Supporters claimed that the selection of a child’s genetic pool could be beneficial because parents get to choose how they want their children to be. There will be no surprises and no disappointments. They create the child who they imagine it would be, leading to their perfect family (Resnik, 2012). Everyone wants to be smarter, be more athletic, or better looking and if technology can design babies in such a way then everyone should want genetic engineering as stated by scientist Joe Tsien (Annas).

Just as there are different types of people who look at one glass of water and describe it as half full or half empty, the public has many different views on the future of our society. Gene therapy is also a glass that can be viewed in different angles – different perspectives. Some say it has great potential to shape the ideals of our future, while others believe it signifies intolerance for disabilities, imperfections that supposedly deplete from a person’s interests, opportunities and welfare (quoted by Peter Singer, xviii). This global issue has brought people with different opinions in the open, arguing their views using history,