Genetic Engineering: Paper 3. Long, Blond Hair, Bright,

Though the use of pre-natal hereditary screening is as of now utilized as a part of high-hazard pregnancies for recognition of illness, for example, Down syndrome and Huntington 's chorea (Ridley 55, 98). As researchers decide the qualities for extra hereditary conditions, screening of incipient organisms will give more data to potential biological parents, former to their offspring has advanced. On the off chance that a screened embryo were found to convey qualities for a specific malady or inability, its guardians may specifically prematurely end it. This gives parents a choice of raising a child with a disability or back out if they don’t have the means to support the child financially, physically, emotionally or mentally. This is a good thing despite what others say because if a child is born with a disability in to family that doesn’t have the means to support it, it is unfair to all parties

Imagine a world where having a baby was like looking through a menu at some fancy restaurant. Imagine being able to choose how a baby will look and act. As mind-boggling as it sounds, scientists and researchers came across an unbelievable discovery: it is possible to design and edit a baby however a person may like. Hanson asserts that personality, gender, appearance, intelligence, hair color, and height can be changed using technology that was originally used for animals (Hanson). These babies are called designer babies. Phillip Ball, a science writer, claims that it is possible to change the genetic makeup of an unborn baby using bio-technology. However, these changes can have more negative effects than positive. Although most countries have not legislated the use of genetic modification, studies have been done on human embryos in China (Ball).

Technology is developing every day. The automobile was revolutionary, and then they introduced the plane. Cell phones can connect us with people around the world. Self-driving cars are in development today! Revolutionary inventions are the expectation nowadays, but a new discovery is sparking controversial questions in the science world. Is it acceptable to alter a baby’s genes to make it a better human? Genes are the instruction book of the body, and they determine everyone’s attributes and how people act in their environment (Medical News Today). Some people say that everyone is different for a reason, and others think customizing the genes of children was meant to happen. Altering an infant’s genes is acceptable to prevent hereditary diseases, but the line should be drawn at making an artificially smarter, stronger, or prettier human.

Picture a future where everyone is perfect, where judgment would not exist because no one is ugly, everyone is beautiful and flawless. In this “perfect” world each individual would be gifted in a specific category that they would excel in and go beyond what an average mundane could. This is a possible scenario we may encounter in the future if we allow the research of genetically- modified embryos (GM babies) to continue. Discussed by many, this topic has become increasingly popular. For some people this interests them in the sense that we can become the best versions of ourselves, simply by changing our genes. Another reason people support GM babies is that there is experiments that can prevent babies from being born with genetic health problems. Although the creation of these altered GM babies has some advantages, there are several problems that people must consider before we decide to go ahead with these plans. For example, genetic research will disrupt the natural order, which can lead to designer babies or GM babies born with side effects. The dangers of these experiments will greatly affect the world we live in. We must not rush into the practice of GM babies without letting the populations know the outcomes these GM babies can have in our society. Try to help everyone grasp the definition of GM babies and also explain how experiments on embryo can lead to designer babies.

Though it is evident that the concept of “Designer Babies” would prove unpopular amongst the majority of society, there still remains to be advocates for a future compromising of GM children. It is argued that gene technology will bring about a new age of human beings who are happier, smarter and healthier. Supporters look forward to a future when parents could quite literally assemble their children from genes listed in a catalogue. A future in which the health, appearance, personality and life span of our children become mere artefacts of genetic modification.

It is incredible to see how far genetic engineering has come. Humans, plants, and any living organism can now be manipulated. Scientists have found ways to change humans before they are even born. They can remove, add, or alter genes in the human genome. Making things possible that humans (even thirty years ago) would have never imagined. Richard Hayes claims in SuperSize Your Child? that genetic engineering needs to have limitations. That genetic engineering should be used for medical purposes, but not for “genetic modification that could open the door to high-tech eugenic engineering” (188). There is no doubt that genetic engineering can amount to great things, but without limits it could lead the human race into a future that no one

New technological advances and scientific methods continue to change the course of nature. One of the current controversial advances in science and technology is the use of genetically modified embryos in which the study exceeds stem cell research. Scientists have begun planning for research involving human embryos in the genetic modification field. Many technological developments are responsible for improving our living standards and even saving lives, but often such accomplishments have troubling cultural and moral ramifications (Reagan, 2015). We are already beyond the days in which virtually the only procreative option was for a man and a woman to conceive the old-fashioned way (Reagan, 2015). Genetic modification of human embryos can be perceived as a positive evolution in the medical process yet it is surrounded by controversy due to ethical processes. Because this form of genetic modification could affect later born children and their offspring, the protection of human subjects should be a priority in decisions about whether to proceed with such research (Dresser, 2004). The term Human Genetic Engineering was originally made public in 1970. During this time there were several methods biologists began to devise in order to better identify or isolate clone genes for manipulation in several species or mutating them in humans.

The next major leap for humanity is genetic engineering, the process in which different genes are removed and substituted for other, more affective, genes. Genetic engineering has the potential to eliminate thousands of diseases, mutations, and disabilities, saving millions of lives from death and/or suffering. I suggest that we use genetic engineering, but only as a prevention to disease or other mutation genes that will make the person suffer physically or emotionally. I most definitely do not intend that we use this fascinating technology for purposes such as making a person with perfect looks. Parents should be able to choose some of their child's genes, as outlined above, through genetic engineering, for ethical, economical, and social reasons.

The use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, used during in vitro fertilization, for medical screening and sex pre-selection is ethical so as long as it is done for the child’s best interest and not for superficial desires of the parents. Every year, around 3,945,875 babies are born in the United States (NIH, 2017). Unfortunately, 12.1% of women ages 15-44 and 8% of men ages 25 to 44 struggle with infertility issues (CDC, 2016). It is also challenging for gay and lesbian couples to become parents in which one is biologically related by using their gametes (Wittenstein, 2016). Luckily, there are several medical advancements that help individuals become pregnant. A controversial medical advancement that is commonly used is known as In-Vitro

The future of genetic enhancement is upon us, they already have the idea of sperm and egg donors, but there is another way to actually enhance babies to be exactly what the parents want them to be. It has been said that there may be a day where there is a computer, and you select the height you want your baby to be, the sex, how smart they are, and how athletic they are. The idea that there may be a day where people can do this is despicable. What parent would not want their son or daughter to be the top of their class, or a 5 star recruited athlete? The problem with this is that it would even out the playing field too much, every single kid would be this absolutely perfect human being with no flaws, and all the athletic abilty, and IQ anyone could ever want. One of the reasons it has taken so long to figure out how to change the genetics, is actually trying to find out what genes to figure out the pathways and make up of genes, 150 years to be exact (Kwok 229). By Roberta Kwok stating this, it shows that many peple have wanted to see this come into reality, if people have been working on uncovering it for 150 years. So there is no doubt people want this to be an option in the pregnancy process, however some people do not believe it would be right for it to be

Throughout the world, the potential to genetically modify embryos has created controversy whether this procedure if ‘morally correct.’ ‘Designer babies’ have been created by screening embryos for genetic diseases. However, ‘Designer babies’ has also been used to contain selected desired qualities such as eye colour, hair colour and skin complexion. The question remains, “where is the line drawn for ‘designer babies?’”

Embryo screening would be a great invention if it was constricted to only that. This would include “screening for specific diseases” and for people with “difficulty conceiving”, like John Legend and his wife. However, this phenomenon will turn into something that could potentially cause great harm in the

They say in 100,000 years all human beings will look very similar. Thanks to our fast growing global population and our ever growing technology we could be on track for similar facial features rather soon. A new form of technology is giving parents the option of getting to pick both facial features and personality traits for an infant in the womb (Hanson, J. 2017). Many assume this is a great problem and not the way God has intended us to conceive children and cure illnesses; but we’ve come to a world where humans rely on this technology to save lives. That is why parents should allow genetic engineering in the children's lifestyles; it lowers the rate of babies born with certain medical and genetic diseases, pregnancies to go

This egg was then fertilized with normal monkey sperm. Andi glowed green In ultra violet light, showing for the first time that it is possible to change the genetic make-up of a primate by inserting a gene into the egg.” This clearly proves those scientists aren’t far from changing the physical characteristics of humans and that the concept can be made real. It is also believed that in the future, scientists will be able to prevent diabetes, heart diseases and even life threatening diseases such as HIV.

There is an opposition to the practice of human genetic engineering that centers on what many would consider unimportant. For example, wealthy parents making sure their child has the physical appearance of a runway model or a professional athlete. Human genetic engineering possesses the potential for parents to alter their child’s physical appearance. Parents would be able to decide their child’s gender, eye color, hair color, and other forms of physical features. One would imagine such luxuries would only be realistic to the rich, but many top scientists believe parents would sacrifice to give their child a competitive edge. Lee M. Silver explains in his essay titled “A Glimpse of Things to Come” that “Affluent parents will choose to give their children genetic advantages that science and