Genetic Targeting: A Rhetorical Analysis

Humanity is always trying to find a way to make themselves better. In recent news, this has led to a moral debate on weather or not using performance enhancing drugs for sports is morally correct or not. But, what if we had already manipulated the human body to make it better before we were even born? This is what Bill McKibben is referencing in his essay “Designer Genes”, on the morality and the biological arms race that could result when dealing with genetic manipulation and engineering. Though the cat isn’t out of the bag for genetic engineering he references what scientists are doing to skim the fine line that laws and ethics have laid down for us. McKibben’s audience is people who can make laws

Genetically Modified Organisms, or GMO’s, are organisms that have had genes from a different organism implanted into their own genetic code in order to produce a new result (“Genetically engineered foods”). This practice has elicited polar responses across the globe, for a multitude of reasons. Besides the obvious reason, being the morality of changing an organism's DNA for human benefit, one frequently noted problem is the monopolization of GMO’s by the company Monsanto, whose name is nearly synonymous with GMO’s due to their involvement with these crops. Monsanto has been at the center of many controversies regarding GMO’s, and is even considered to be ranked third to last for reputation among all major American companies (Bennett). Most

After watching GMO & OMG, Fix Foods, Fed Up, and reading “ If you pitch it they’ll eat it”, I realize that I need to make changes to my eating habits and that there needs to be a humongous change in our food industry. For an example many of us don’t really pay attention to what we eat if it looks good or smells good we're going to want more. As they said in GMO & OMG “ The Supermodel Foods”. Us people we tend to buy the food that looks best to our preference and not if it’s actually good for us. In the documentary GMO & OMG by: Jeremy Seifert he argues and tries to bring to our attention that there’s Genetically Modified Organisms has been put in our food without our knowledge. But even when knowing this we still continue to buy the genetically

Is this the child that you have envisioned in your future? Or maybe did you see your child with brown eyes rather than blue? Maybe more intellectually gifted? Or with the promise of performing well in sport?

The use of images and other visual aids has become an effective way to stake one’s claim on a situation since the popularization of media in all its forms. Companies, as well as different organizations, use images on their websites in the same way advertisers use websites, to persuade people to buy a certain product or believe in a certain cause. Genetically Modified Organisms have been a topic of negative commentary and The Non-GMO Project wishes to bring awareness of this topic to the public, utilizing their Verified stamp of approval as well as their website, which highlights many ways to live a GMO-free lifestyle. The Non-GMO Project, a credible stakeholder in the fight against Genetically Modified Organisms, uses images on their website to persuade people to live a healthier lifestyle by avoiding products containing these harmful Genetically Modified Organisms. The website is full of images that could make even the unhealthiest of people want to eat GMO free foods. The Non-GMO Project

Today technology has changed the life of many individuals, this new improvements have come a long way over the course of a lifetime. The new technological advances have led to new scientific discoveries that have help society to better understand the world that we live in. Gregory Stock in his article “Choosing our Genes” (2002) states the importance of germinal choice technology and how this new method will allow parents to influence the genetics of their unborn children. His purpose is to influence the reader about the benefits that this method might have in future generations and to encourage his audience to support this unique method. Stock is writing to a well-educated audience such as scientists, college students, and educators who are

The science of eugenics was widely used during the 20th century in the United States to strategically eliminate the reproductive rights of women who were deemed inferior on the social ladder (“What is Eugenics?”). Some women of color, women with disabilities, and women from lower financial classes were sterilized for permanent birth control, and sometimes without their consent or knowledge (“What is Eugenics?”). The eugenics movement was aimed to promote selective human features in order to increase those with intelligence, good health, physical characteristics, and class. Currently, the recent controversy of human genetic engineering has scientist concerned that it will become the new eugenics. Sterilizing women as a precaution to prevent the overpopulation of unfavorable offspring would go against Jonathan Swift’s equal treatment of all humans, Benjamin Franklin’s hopes for human ethics in science, and be a direct violation to the natural born rights of all humans. Also, the controversial practice of human genetic modification to restrict reproduction rights only to people of desirable traits is unethical because it promotes racial cleansing.

whereas they do not have control over other countries governed laws. Allowing the United States to fall behind other countries technical and medical enhancements is not a wise decision. The United States would be taking a drastic step backwards by not saving lives, like this technology has done before(Farahany). Scientists have finally found a safer form of genetic modification and are not being allowed to perform these procedures because of safety regulations that no one can improve without funding to understand what exactly is the problem with this technology.

In other words, they are worried that parents having the ability to control what their child will be like will disrupt the plan that God has created for them. Some also believe that it is unethical to make a decision that will affect a person without their consent, which is exactly what genetic modification would be doing. By changing the plan that God has created and making a decision on behalf of a person without their consent are both seen as unethical and going against religious

He had a really good attention getter, he told the story about the parents that called his personal cell number in the evening to ask for advice. I feel that story helped to build his credibility because he said “like some public officials my phone number was published so I answered the phone” (N. Giuliano, personal communication, April 19, 2017) by him publishing his personal phone number and answering it at after 9 p.m. makes him extremely accessible to the community and shows that he truly cares about the town he was elected mayor of. He also came full circle with his speech and ended with a story about how he ran into the son of the parents, who called him, years later in the grocery store. For me it was fairly difficult to identify his thesis, which I feel made it the other weakest aspect of the presentation; according to the textbook, “speakers, especially novice speakers but also experienced ones, are so concerned with the content of the speech that they forget to let us know about

The power of modifying genetics is at our fingertips, allowing us to change the genes of living creatures, which of course includes humans. The concern is; what genes should be modified, and which genes should be left alone. A company called 23andMe, named after the 23 pairs of chromosomes in a human cell, will provide ancestry genetic reports and uninterpreted raw genetic data using only a kit. Created in 2006, out of Mountain View, California, the company specializes in three different products or kits, an ancestry edition, a health edition, and a complete edition. Sadly, due to FDA regulations and complications, 23andMe has had to sideline the interpretation of their health-based products in the United States. Currently, 23andMe mainly

As a result, recent molecular and translational research is introducing target-based therapies for the management of

Reference List: • Revolutionizing Medicine. (n.d.). Retrieved October 24, 2017, from https://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/~mcclean/plsc431/students/brandi.htm • Genetic Disorders: MedlinePlus. (n.d.). Retrieved October 24, 2017, from https://medlineplus.gov/geneticdisorders.html • Genes and Gene Therapy: MedlinePlus.

Genetic Modification is the manipulation of an organism’s genes with biotechnology. This is a group of technologies used to modify the cells, also the transfer of genes within and to different species to make improved or new organisms.

The speech that I viewed was the lecture of Father Boyle and Jose which was very intriguing. In the speech I finally had the opportunity to listen more about Homeboy Industries and learn about the impact they have on the people they help and how they’re helping their communities which was phenomenal. To begin, the lecture began by one of the people who work at the organization and his name is Jose. The lecture that I watched was of Father Boyle and Jose and was an amazing time well spent. I finally had the opportunity to listen more about Homeboy industries and the impact they have on the people they help and also our communities which was phenomenal. To begin, the lecture began by one of the people who work in the organization and his name