Genetic Testing : Is We Ready Yet? Essay

   The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be

One can say that genetic tests are very expensive and are not effective, I still maintain that getting a genetic test down helps identify genetically pasted diseases that run in your family. The main disease that is identified is cancer. In female it is breast cancer, and in male it is colon cancer. If you get a genetic test down early you can save a lot of money later in your

Many medical advances are being made today in the area of genetics. One of the most talked about is prenatal genetic testing. The purpose of prenatal genetic testing is to obtain information on a baby's health before they are born. This new technology will definitely improve the quality of human life. Diseases will be diminished and through new advances some diseases might even be eliminated. Children will be at less risk to have major health problems in their lives adding positively to their life experience. Prenatal genetic testing will also affects society as a whole.

The benefits of genetic science for society is for employers who want to know if their employers are in excellent working condition and if the worker will cause them more money when obtaining health insurance. If an employer hires someone that that is healthy then the cost of health insurance does not rise and the employee will not have to downgrade their health insurance plan so that they can accommodate the employee that is not healthy. The limitations of genetic science for society are the possibility of genetic testing causing safety issues at work, the development of a genetic low class, the breach of privilege and confidentiality, and the utilization of genetic bias to excuse different methods of discrimination (Krumm, 2002).

There are two main ways genetic testing places a constraint on a child’s right to an open future. The first of these is that the revelation of a child’s disease status can change his life narrative and the way parents and others treat him, and substantially alter his or her life’s trajectory (Davis _____). Parents may feel guilty or shelter their not-yet-sick

The Human Genome Project introduces significant scientific findings to the world, but raises a lot of controversies. Many of these controversies concern the application of this new scientific finding and its ethicality. Genetic information from a project, once aimed towards mapping the human genome in hope for curing diseases, are now being used in businesses. It shouldn’t be permissible for employers to require that all employees, as well as potential employees, be screened for genetic vulnerabilities and to use the results of such screening when they make hiring, retention, and job assignment decisions. These genetic vulnerabilities may include diseases, unsuitable personality traits and other traits the company deems undesirable. Employees shouldn’t be judged by their genes, because the results do not adequately speak for what the employees will do in life, the employee’s position in the society, and the employee’s financial standing. Genetic testing should be an option for the employees to decide on job assignment rather than influence the hiring decisions of employers. Genetic testing only shows genetic potential, not potential growth. Conducting genetic testings on employees infringes on their privacy and encourage more social gaps with genetic classes.

I do not believe that “direct-to-consumer” genetic testing is wise, especially without the involvement of trained professionals or set guidelines. As mentioned in the prompt, some of the risks that I believe are important involve the ethical and social challenges direct-to-consumer testing can create as well as the complexity of certain genomic tests.

As technology is improving, there is becoming more of a debate for if parents should get their kids genetically tested. There are three reasons why you shouldn’t, it produces anxiety, finds unknown information, and it can find incurable diseases.

Know you're future now. A new trend in science today. Genetic testing, is a world of benefits for individuals who are selected for this test. Knowing that he could have possibly offspring with birth defects or serious health problems among the main reasons why choose individuals that these genetic tests done. Not when it comes to genetic testing on pregnant women and there is a small controversy. Parents should do genetic testing or not. one perfect example is the Cell-Free Fetal DNA Test.

What if I told you humans have the ability to test for every known disease that you could possibly be susceptible to in a lifetime? What if I told you we could reduce health care costs by eliminating diseases that drive up insurance premiums? What if I told you humanity could get smarter merely by the manipulation of DNA? Well we can, and we have the technology. Genetic testing is a type of medical test that identifies changes in chromosomes, genes, or proteins. It is not eugenics, immoral, or murder. It is merely a test. Contrary to what many critics will say, genetic testing and genetic manipulation can play a vital role in shaping humanities future and development and although some precautions should be put in place to insure it is not used in an incorrect matter the benefits far outweigh the cons.

With the advances made in genetic testing and the lowering cost of testing, conversations surrounding the ethical considerations of genetic screening in newborns as well as adults is becoming more and more commonplace. One such commentary is made by Pollack (2010) in his article on genetic screening in newborns, who cautions against both the monetary and emotional cost of genetic screening. The following paragraphs will offer a summary of Pollack’s (2010) article, as well as a critique of the article in which this author will agree that genetic testing comes at potentially great cost and should be carefully considered.

The idea of genetic testing has made a lot of people happy because scientists are moving forward at being able to predict future health problems. Sometimes, as little as careful medical supervision and lifestyle changes could help people avoid illness. In the future, scientists hope for treatment that will correct genetic errors. However, there are some disorders that do not have treatment available yet. There are also some fears that come along with genetic testing such as it being used for human breeding to encourage traits that individuals want or to prevent ones that they do not want (“Genetic

Genetic testing negatively affects MILLIONS of lives. Those test results may trigger bad emotions. Testing may cost too much for the average person. Also, these screenings are not full body reviews.Considering these genetic testing should be prohibited from being offered from agencies for everyone's life.

The subject matter of genetic testing was at the most extreme in this particular motion picture. I have known for quite some time that these undertakings could be achieved with the knowledge and scientific discoveries that we have today, however, it made me feel distraught that the world could possibly one day come to that. It was so aesthetic and some would say monotonous. What is really disheartening is that like Ethan’s character, who was so intelligent, trained his body to be strong, and had so much to give this world, he could have been deprived of living out his dream simply due to not being picture-perfect. I can recognize performing genetic testing is a necessity if there is suspected illness or disease. By all means test me or any

Genetic testing is the crystal ball of health predictions. Geneticist across the U.S have been quite successful of analyzing and assessing patients (human genome) that are the most reliable and beneficial resources for patients and physicians to review patients health in the near future. However, insurance are not likely to pay for additional testing, but pay for the basic panel of testing, which include BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 (breast cancer gene of its protein product). Physicians are known to test for additional gene panel to understand and retrieve information about the patient family and history of tumor and cancer. According to Holbrook (2013), “the use of genetic testing has spread from crime scenes and footballs and evolved from convicting and exonerating. It now allows a person to equip themselves with vital information about their bodies. They can find out whether they are more predisposed to certain health risk” (p.1). As genetic testing for disease has become more popular, many laws have aimed to prevent discrimination based off patients results of such tests that are being conducted in many geneticist and physicians clinic. Nevertheless, many individuals feel that, as this type of testing becomes more popular, regulators will be forced to do something to prevent discrimination in the disability, long-term care and life insurance sectors.