preview

Genghis Khan And The Making Of The Modern World Summary

Decent Essays

Among a sea of warriors in history, the so-called thirteenth-century conqueror, Genghis Khan, is more likely to be known as a man who caused a huge amount of destruction to human civilization around the world. Especially in the western world, the scholars portrayed him in a largely negative way as “a barbarian, the bloody savage, the ruthless conqueror” who brutally defeated and devastated the civilization (Weatherford xxvi). However, this view has been challenged when Jack Weatherford published his book, Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World in 2004. In his book, he attempted to dispel the decades of negative image of Genghis Khan and emphasized the importance of his contributions to western civilization and the modern world. Like …show more content…

During that period, it was forbidden to even say the name of Genghis Khan in public (Kaplonski 147). Despite the fact that it was illegal to mention Genghis Khan, several books and scholarly journals have been published (Kaplonski 159). When Mongolia’s first textbook, the People’s Textbook, was published in 1948 under the auspices of the Mongolian Ministry of Education, they included a history section acknowledging how Genghis Khan united all the tribes in the vast steppe and how he contributed to the modern world by his accomplishments (Kaplonski 159). However, this positive view about him later shifted to a negative one because of the political pressure as it was not considered appropriate Marxist content. It is possibly evident from an excerpt of the text that notes, “The blood of the children of honest Mongolian herders flowed to support Mongolian feudal privilege, despotism, and rule. In this Genghis Khan was not honest, and this is a shameful side of history” (Kaplonski 160). Although this statement refers to the negative side of Genghis Khan, it was not successful in persuading and influencing Mongolians on whether he was a bad person. The reason Mongolians accepted and incorporated the content of the textbook was only to prevent the fading significance of the founding father of Mongolia regardless of how bad of a person he was …show more content…

He further claims his establishment of trade routes of Silk Road played an important role in the commercial and the cultural exchange between East and West (Weatherford xxiii). For example, he introduced Europe to technologies and other commodities such as paintings, compasses, silk, cotton, gold, and so on through the trade route (Weatherford 228). Weatherford also emphasized the role of Genghis in promoting religious toleration and humanitarian values, abolishing the slave trade, expanding a global economy, and granting diplomatic immunity (Weatherford 234). Through this claim, Weatherford reveals that Genghis Khan did not force his specific religion on the nations he defeated but he believed every religion was significant to each other. He even exempted religious leaders and institutions from taxation (Weatherford 69). The publication of his book exposed new details about Genghis Khan’s life in terms of his humanity and generosity rather than what most people believe about

Get Access